Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 62 (9041 total)
570 online now:
dwise1, nwr (2 members, 568 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 885,918 Year: 3,564/14,102 Month: 184/321 Week: 44/59 Day: 5/4 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
Inactive Member

Message 172 of 1486 (663912)
05-27-2012 7:45 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by RAZD
05-27-2012 6:34 PM

Re: stage one recognition

RAZD writes:

It also means there was no WWFlood during that time, because the chronologies are continuous.

RAZD this thread is a little over my head but I'll try to try and grasp it the best I can hopefully. What do you mean here? If there was a world wide flood are you saying it would wipe out all the correlations and start fresh? Let's say there was a flood anywhere at any point in time no matter how small, would we be able to correlate any thing in that area? By continuous you mean uninterrupted? How can you tell? I think you're saying tree rings (for example) were uninterrupted and continuous? What if those trees just survived the flood? How can you tell they didn't?

I realize these may be silly questions to ask but I'm just trying to understand the thread. These are in no way me attempting any gotcha questions. They probably make no sense but like I said I'm just trying to understand what you are meaning with the correlations and how you get them. Thanks RAZD.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by RAZD, posted 05-27-2012 6:34 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by RAZD, posted 05-27-2012 8:12 PM Chuck77 has responded
 Message 176 by foreveryoung, posted 05-27-2012 8:13 PM Chuck77 has acknowledged this reply

Inactive Member

Message 181 of 1486 (663971)
05-28-2012 5:49 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by RAZD
05-27-2012 8:12 PM

Re: stage one recognition
Hi RAZD. Thanks. I hope you're doing well too.

RAZD writes:

This point is also recognized by AIG:


Thanks RAZD. I'll take a look at it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by RAZD, posted 05-27-2012 8:12 PM RAZD has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021