I fear you have fallen into the trap of expecting the troll's words to represent something in the real world. That appears not to be the case. It appears that its use of language is more akin to Mark Twain's character Mr. Ballou, who used words for their resonance and grandeur rather than their meaning. Words, for this person, are more akin to a mantra, a drone, a soothing and repetitive collection of sounds. Kind of like really bad scat singing without the music. The lack of connection to reality is of no concern.
Some of the earmarks of the great flood of Noah were that all animals and people on earth, save those on the ark all died. That qualifies as a great extinction if ever anything ever did! The water also came from space and below the earth and that is where science says iridium also comes from.
It is not a chance/fluke universe. It is created. Intelligently. It is science that says things happened for no reason. The big bang, why did it happen in your religion? Life on earth, why did it happen in your religion, if not by random happenstance!?
As for details of materials Jesus used in a project, google New Jerusalem and what materials He used to build it,
Re: Prometheus evidence vs fantasy, Prometheus vs fantasy, Prometheus 9, fantasy 0
What is in question, is not how patterns of C14 exist in ancient tree rings and other sources. The ehing that is off kilter here is that you were asked about specific tree rings (pre 4500 year old rings) in a certain tree, and the response involved a chart that had nothing to do with that. Instead it charted some patterns supposed going far far back in time.
Message 1138: You were asked about the HUNDREDS of rings on the specific tree that was living that YOU made specific claims about actually! Not 'one' ring'!
Cut the smoke and mirrors and admit the astounding fail.
The problem is that I do not need to have pictures of every ring on every one of the samples used. Why? because they are documented multifold times and in not one instance has there been any question about them being annual rings. I've shown you pictures with "HUNDREDS of rings on the specific tree" and noted that there are other sources for your enquiry.
Those sources are all I need to show correlation between actual measured C14 levels and tree ring age. Those diagrams (like this one):
show measured amount of C14 converted in raw C14 age by a mathematical formula (Libby).
There is no need to show any one ring along the bottom, because they are documented in the studies -- the information is there, OR you can contact the authors for it.
I don't need pictures of specific rings to show the correlation.
Message 1: The challenge for the creationist is not just to describe how a single method can be wrong, but how they can all be wrong at the same time and yet produce identical results - when the errors in different systems should produce different random results.
The correlations are the issue, not specific tidbits of data -- something you are still avoiding.
Seems like while I was away you ran off at the mouth with a bunch of totally irrelevant garbage that has nothing to do with correlations.
Typical creationist ploy -- try to change the topic when you can't deal with the correlations.