Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,798 Year: 4,055/9,624 Month: 926/974 Week: 253/286 Day: 14/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creative day
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 11 of 19 (40096)
05-14-2003 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Spud
05-14-2003 7:12 AM


Re: Evidence
The simple fact is that carbon dating refutes YEC claims, so YECs like Answers in Genesis make up excuses to try to deny the truth,
The simple fact is that dendrochronology does give an independant check because the dates are established by tree-ring counts. Different fragments are matched by comparing patterns within the rings.
(see http://web.utk.edu/~grissino/ for plenty of information
http://web.utk.edu/~grissino/principles.htm describes the methods actually used)
Other methods to check C14 dating include lake varves and ice cores.
(e.g http://www.cio.phys.rug.nl/HTML-docs/Verslag/97/PE-04.htm
a more popular article is at http://more.abcnews.go.com/...ence/dailynews/carbon0220.html)
C14 is quite accurate enough to disprove YEC claims - and that has been proven beyond reasonable doubt.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Spud, posted 05-14-2003 7:12 AM Spud has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024