Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8965 total)
44 online now:
AZPaul3, Coragyps, CosmicChimp, Faith, PaulK (5 members, 39 visitors)
Newest Member: javier martinez
Post Volume: Total: 873,290 Year: 5,038/23,288 Month: 159/1,784 Week: 46/211 Day: 13/33 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are Uranium Halos the best evidence of (a) an old earth AND (b) constant physics?
Taq
Member
Posts: 8262
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 6.2


Message 132 of 142 (667792)
07-12-2012 11:15 AM


Establishing the Models
Before we go too far into Setterfield's ideas, I think it is important to establish whether or not observations are consistent with constant physical forces. Mind you, I am not saying that the observations "prove" unchanging physical constants. Rather, I am asking foreveryoung (or any other creationist) if our observations would be different if constants were in fact constant over the last 13+ billion years.

The problem that I see with the creationist argument is that it boils down to the claim that evidence for changing constants is indistinguishable from a universe with unchanging constants. Specific to this thread, should uranium haloes appear differently today if the laws in the past were the same as today?

Edited by Taq, : No reason given.


  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020