quote:
Of course, it is futile to try to present such an argument here on evc as one soon becomes accused by admin and others of breaking admin rules by unscientific argument.
That's a back-handed insult if I ever saw it. Buzsaw, you tried to present a scientific case for the Flood and the 'canopy' idea, and you were soundly refuted. I don't recall you invoking 'goddidit' during that thread.
Is it any wonder that you were debated on scientific grounds and defeated on the same grounds? Don't make yourself out to be such a martyr; your hypothesis was knocked down fair and square, so stop parrotting it in other threads. By all means, put a case together that includes the supernatural if you feel you must - but don't call it a hypothesis, because it has been rejected by science.
And now, back to the thread topic: Literalist, although you might think your Flood scenario is plausible, we still do not see any evidence for it in the geological record. A single flood event would produce a single sediment layer; there is nothing to suggest that a larger flood would produce anything other than a larger layer.
The Rockhound
™ Version 4.2
