Oh no, you seem to be doing fine
I'd hate to tread on your toes... and oh, is that the time? Really must sleep
That site is a hoot though...
quote:
It is logically inconsistent, of course, for the electron to be an elementary particle that has no quarks when it is the decay product of a neutron that is supposed to be composed of three quarks.
Where's that :bang head: emoticon when you need it?
As for the nuclear shell model, it's pretty much standard physics. It isn't perfect because it's a simplification. With the huge separation of the constituents, atomic shell physics is very precise, but the crampedm nucleus is whole different story...
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.