Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒

Radioactive carbon dating

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Radioactive carbon dating
anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 12 of 221 (310069)
05-07-2006 6:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 10 by JonF
05-07-2006 4:47 PM

There's a very good explanation of how radiometric dating methods weork at Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective.
​
Personally, I think very good is an understatement in this case. Thanks for the link.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by JonF, posted 05-07-2006 4:47 PM JonF has not replied
  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 24 of 221 (395603)
04-17-2007 1:42 AM 		Reply to: Message 19 by ArchArchitect
04-17-2007 1:24 AM

Re: Carbon Dating is False because...
AA writes:
​
Why do you think that the fossils in volcanic areas are much, much older than those fossils that are found in cooler areas like oasises? The scientists are not including that into the equation, which inevitably makes Carbon dating false.
​
And your source for this most startling piece of information is....?
​
Edited by anglagard, : forgot ellipses
This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by ArchArchitect, posted 04-17-2007 1:24 AM ArchArchitect has not replied
  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 167 of 221 (508289)
05-12-2009 2:22 AM 		Reply to: Message 166 by IchiBan
05-12-2009 1:35 AM

Off Topic Crap
Ichiban (in regard to Coyote) writes:
​
You claim to have a PHD in evolutionary sciences and works in radiocarbon dating. But for some reason these credentials & works you wont reveal in public, so we just 'have to take your word for it'.
​
You get away with making many claims assertions and accusations without ever backing them up with the same standards you hold others to.
​
Coyote talks the talk and walks the walk, I have no doubt he is dead honest in his credentials.
​
Rather than declare some personal vendetta against Coyote, why don't you take up the challenge offered by RAZD in his correlations thread? After all, it is only your personal integrity that is at stake.
​
Also since you brought it up, your credentials are?
​
Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
​
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza
This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by IchiBan, posted 05-12-2009 1:35 AM IchiBan has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024