Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8998 total)
63 online now:
PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat) (2 members, 61 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,552 Year: 11,300/23,288 Month: 552/1,763 Week: 191/328 Day: 18/88 Hour: 0/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Validity of Radiometric Dating
Phat
Member
Posts: 14314
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 197 of 200 (832745)
05-09-2018 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by ringo
07-16-2014 1:06 PM


Re: why wiki may be a poor source
ringo writes:

Science depends entirely on disagreement. Scientists try to falsify their own hypotheses - if they don't, somebody else might do it for them and make them look bad.

Well we all disagree a lot around here. Maybe that makes us all scientists~!


Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. –RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." –Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith :)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by ringo, posted 07-16-2014 1:06 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by ringo, posted 05-09-2018 3:20 PM Phat has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020