Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   sin and carbon 14 dating?
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2914 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 31 of 36 (472747)
06-24-2008 3:26 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by NosyNed
03-09-2004 12:52 AM


Re: An interesting experiment
quote:
It should be possible to find wood from an independently dated whore house and church. We could, for example, do a tree ring comparison on the timbers and corroborate this with the historical dates of construction of the buildings.
You didn't say, but is your assumption that more sinning is taking place in the cat house than the church? Most people would, anyway. I am going to take the contrarian view. I do not have personal experience with whore houses but I do have lots of experiences with churches and my observation is that a LOT of sinning goes on there.
Try gossiping, back biting, abuse of power, and lying among others.
My suspicion is that in fact, the your average whore house is less sinful than your average church, all things equal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by NosyNed, posted 03-09-2004 12:52 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2914 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 34 of 36 (473501)
06-30-2008 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by randman
06-25-2005 2:43 AM


Re: looking for heaven
quote:
But it would probably be useless for scientists because, by and large, the scientific community is predisposed to reject such things out of hand, and would probably not allow any such studies to be published in their journals.
A convenient self serving little rationalization for creationists but a common misunderstanding of the scientific process. Science is based on the notion of FALSIFICATION - in other words, before ANY scientific claim is accepted, it must be shown to be falsifiable and then the data must in fact be consistent with the claim. And if a claim is not falsifiable - well then it is not a scientific claim and any studies regarding that claim are therefore not scientific studies and do not belong in a scientific journal. What part of "it is not science" do you not understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by randman, posted 06-25-2005 2:43 AM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024