Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dating methodology for the Vishnu Schist
CACTUSJACKmankin
Member (Idle past 6295 days)
Posts: 48
Joined: 04-22-2006


Message 8 of 17 (360698)
11-02-2006 8:11 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by anglagard
11-02-2006 6:24 AM


Re: Deposition and Erosion
To address the issue of carbon dating, the reason why carbon dating is not relevant in this discussion of the grand canyon is that the half-life of carbon 14 (5,730 years) is much too short to measure anything as old as most rocks. Carbon 14 is only good for about 50,000 years before there's too little of it present in the material to reliably measure. The other reason why you wouldn't use carbon to date rocks is that rocks usually don't contain all that much carbon, carbon dating is used for dead things like pieces of paper or paint or wood from archaeological sites.
The most common decays used are potassium-argon (HL of 1.3 billion years) and uranium-lead (the two isotopes of uranium (238 and 235) decay to different isotopes of lead (207 and 206) with HLs of 700 million and 4.5 billion).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by anglagard, posted 11-02-2006 6:24 AM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024