Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9045 total)
471 online now:
jar (1 member, 470 visitors)
Newest Member: Dade
Post Volume: Total: 887,404 Year: 5,050/14,102 Month: 648/707 Week: 46/157 Day: 12/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The dating game
Son Goku
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 1171
From: Ireland
Joined: 07-16-2005


Message 21 of 94 (392765)
04-02-2007 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by RAZD
04-01-2007 10:42 PM


Re: Calculated rates - Cavediver? Son Goku?
Son Goku writes:

I couldn't find anything on calculating half-lives (too many responses about using them in decay calculations). We'll need one of the physics gurus ...


Calculating Half-Lives basically involves calculating decay rates. Calculating decay rates is a very difficult, technical and involved subject. I was going to give a post describing it, but then I realised that the post would have to be five posts long to really convey anything properly.

Basically you've to right down the Lagrangian, the entity that describes the particle interactions, then you've to calculate in a rest frame that simplifies the calulcation. Then you've to compute the Feynman Diagrams......blah,blah......... and there's a huge amount of dirac algebra, unless your dealing with simple scalar particles with simplified Lagrangians.
Then after you've done all that you'd still have only calculated one mode (i.e. only one of many possible decays), any given particle can decay into quite a different number of things.

Quantum Mechanics isn't really enough to deal with decay rates (in fact it treats them artificially, at the very least I don't like it), you need Quantum Field Theory.

Even then I've only ever truly worked out free-particle decays. Actually working out decay rates for bound states like atoms would require teams of people (that's what 90% of the physicists at the Manhattan Project were doing) or a computer.

Edited by Son Goku, : Spelling.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by RAZD, posted 04-01-2007 10:42 PM RAZD has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by NosyNed, posted 04-02-2007 7:55 PM Son Goku has responded

  
Son Goku
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 1171
From: Ireland
Joined: 07-16-2005


Message 48 of 94 (393070)
04-03-2007 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by NosyNed
04-02-2007 7:55 PM


Re: Calculated rates - Cavediver? Son Goku?
But it has been done?

Yes, I think it has been accurately done for at least thirty years.

And what kind of agreement with measurements do you get?

As perfect as possible. It is not within our technological abilities to detect the difference between the predicted value and the observed value. If there is a difference it would be a while before we have the technology to detect it.

What are the inputs? E.g., speed of light, h bar etc.

h bar and the speed of light aren't inputs, only conversion factors. The true, non-chosen, inputs would be the fine structure constant, the weak and strong coupling constants and a few particle masses.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by NosyNed, posted 04-02-2007 7:55 PM NosyNed has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by NosyNed, posted 04-03-2007 1:18 PM Son Goku has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021