So scientist observed species evolving for millions of years and can verify?
Scientists have observed species evolving all around us and can verify that the process of evolution is an empirical objective fact, so you can repeat these observations should you so desire.
Scientists have observed the effects of evolution on species, and can recognize and verify those effects in the fossil record, and this too is an empirical objective fact, so you can repeat these observations should you so desire.
The Theory of Evolution (ToE), stated in simple terms, is that the process of evolution over generations, and the process of divergent speciation, are sufficient to explain the diversity of life as we know it, from the fossil record, from the genetic record, from the historic record, and from everyday record of the life we observe in the world all around us.
These process explain the fossil record, and this has been verified by peer review by hundreds of independent scientists.
No other explanation provides as complete an explanation of the fossil record. Curiously, that is all that is required by science - explaining the evidence in the best known manner.
If not then it is assumption by viewing aging you see and then calculating the age by how it ages before you but this process is speculative at best.
Again, we can measure the age of rocks and other things by known verified means, and if you doubt this then you need to investigate it. Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
is a good place for you to start, as I have suggested before.
Without doing so then you will just be repeating comments based on ignorance.
To claim anything other is absolute fairytales and bold faced lies.
So go to the Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
thread and demonstrate that it is "fairytales and bold faced lies" -- unless you want to willfully stay ignorant of what can be known and verified.
Edited by RAZD, : ...