Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,482 Year: 3,739/9,624 Month: 610/974 Week: 223/276 Day: 63/34 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Unbended Curved Bar Space Slugout Thread
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 413 (482347)
09-16-2008 4:45 AM


The curvature of spacetime actually exists.
Buz, would it be helpful to know that the curvature of spacetime has been measured directly by satellites orbiting the Earth?
This involved no measurements of light, e.t.c. It really was just a measurement of spacetime. So the curvature of spacetime is an empirical fact. Even ignoring GR, we know spacetime is curved.

Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 160 of 413 (482382)
09-16-2008 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by Buzsaw
09-16-2008 11:54 AM


Re: Models
It is the curvature itself. Spacetime has curvature as a property.
The full on answer is that the concept of distance itself changes across the universe and it is this "change in the definition of distance" that causes curvature.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by Buzsaw, posted 09-16-2008 11:54 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by Buzsaw, posted 09-16-2008 8:51 PM Son Goku has not replied

Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 378 of 413 (484388)
09-28-2008 5:43 AM
Reply to: Message 375 by Buzsaw
09-27-2008 11:59 PM


Re: Gravitational effect on Spacetime
What properties of space and time allow for them to be cuved/warped by dense mass gravity?
Their coupling to the stress energy of matter. I don't know how much use that is but it's the answer.
What GR, QM and math appears to be accomplishing is mystifying what your model described above demonstrates, i.e. reality by adding a non-spatial dimension to the three spatial dimensions, applying a lot of complicated math, QM and GR to the mix of dimensions in order to conjure up an obvious impossibility being that the bar's ends are capable of rejoining.
This all reminds me of the professional trick illusionist magician who cleverly performs apparent amazing feats which appear super-natural.
Let's be realistic and not suggest that all this unintuitive stuff from theoretical physics was just be made up to be confusing or semi-mystical. I mean it would be bone stupid if anybody stayed in the subject if it was so obviously a pile of nonsense.
Rather one should take the more realistic view that physics, like most academic subjects, has been progressing over the few hundred years and because of this its terminology is largely disconnected from standard English. Also it has discovered genuinely new things and since those things were not known before there is no way to imagine them in pre-existing mental frameworks.
Let us reduce this debate significantly, by providing an answer to this question:
If General Relativity is incorrect and so fatally incorrect as you imply, why does it match experiment perfectly?
Your own answer to this question would help in addressing your objections.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 375 by Buzsaw, posted 09-27-2008 11:59 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 389 by Buzsaw, posted 09-28-2008 8:30 PM Son Goku has replied

Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 404 of 413 (484568)
09-29-2008 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 389 by Buzsaw
09-28-2008 8:30 PM


Re: Gravitational effect on Spacetime
You evaded my question, Son Goku.
Is it not more plausible that I simply misunderstood it or that you misunderstood me? I must say this is a very "rude" claim to make.
But coupling to space and matter is what (abe: those properties) allegedly allow space to do, not what those properties are. An analogy would be, if you join a team, (abe: being a member of a team) is not a property of you as a human, it is something; an activity that you, (abe: the human,) has decided to join up to.
Note: I haven't forgotten your question but I need you to answer mine forthrightly first. Fair enough?
So we're back to square one. Son Goku, what properties of space allow for it to be curved/warped by energy and matter? I assume a forthright answer would be we really don't know. Do you agree with Onifre that this is correct?
Okay, the real answer. Although it will not be much use.
The diffeomorphism invariance of spacetime is the property that allows it to curve. This provides a conserved current, the Stress-Energy tensor which matter can then couple to. This allows matter to directly influence the Ricci curvature of spacetime.
If this does not satisfy you then it's the fact that spacetime is pseudo-Riemannian.
Or rather the question has a much simpler answer given already. Which is that it can curve because it can curve. There is no need for me to evade. Spacetime's curvature has been measured, that is a simple fact. There is no need to understand curvature in terms of other underlying properties, it is a property itself.
Edited by Son Goku, : Addition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by Buzsaw, posted 09-28-2008 8:30 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 408 by Buzsaw, posted 09-29-2008 8:57 PM Son Goku has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024