Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
11 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,464 Year: 3,721/9,624 Month: 592/974 Week: 205/276 Day: 45/34 Hour: 2/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the appeal of evolution?
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 11 of 75 (351434)
09-22-2006 5:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Percy
09-22-2006 4:04 PM


What is the appeal of evolution?
Why do people find gravity to be so attractive?
Edited by AnswersInGenitals, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Percy, posted 09-22-2006 4:04 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Coragyps, posted 09-22-2006 5:42 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied
 Message 14 by mike the wiz, posted 09-22-2006 5:58 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 15 of 75 (351444)
09-22-2006 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Jazzns
09-22-2006 5:35 PM


At play in the fields of the lord.
Actually, as everyone knows, and as Faith will remind them if they forget, the acceptance of theories by the scientific community is based on a biannual Gallup poll that is conducted every three years. In the poll of 1936, evolution won out quite handily over 'because my daddy says so', 'why the hell shouldn't there be lots of species', and several other contenders. Unfortunately, due to a transcriptional error the poll asked for the neatest theory to explain the origin of feces rather than species, and the vast majority of respondents were found to believe that feces evolve from lower life forms (like shrimp, Brussel sprouts, and pizza.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Jazzns, posted 09-22-2006 5:35 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 19 of 75 (351454)
09-22-2006 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Faith
09-22-2006 6:03 PM


Faith gets specific!
Seems to me evolutionists have changed their assessment of the age of the earth many times. May still change it again. Why not?
I believe evolutionists leave the assessment of the earth's age to geologists and astronomers, who have the training, knowledge, and tools to make the best estimate possible with current technology. I am curious. What is your assessment of the age of the earth? And please, no wishy-washy numbers with zeros at the end. What is your precise assessment down to the exact year?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Faith, posted 09-22-2006 6:03 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by subbie, posted 09-22-2006 7:24 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied
 Message 21 by Philip, posted 09-22-2006 7:35 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 28 of 75 (351606)
09-23-2006 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Percy
09-23-2006 9:36 AM


How good science should be done.
What we clearly have here is a case of Harmonic Convergence. This is most readily evident at science conferences. When a current theory starts to get old and boring, scientists in the relevant field convene a conference (at taxpayer expense). Someone is chosen from the audience, usually the person with the heaviest and least intelligible accent, and he(never a she) steps up to the podium and propose a new theory. At this point, the audience breaks into cheers and applause as they show their complete accord with the proposed new theory. They often perform a wave at this point. The organizers of the conference then nominate the speaker for a Nobel prize and they all rush out for coffee and donuts.
The role of experimentalists should not be underestimated: in a real sense, they have the most challenging job - reinterpreting all their data to fit the new theory.
This process and all that converged harmony explains why science conferences are always completely devoid of controversy, disagreement, and rancor. Hey, when was the last time you saw Lamarkian evolutionists and Darwinian evolutionists sending suicide bombers into each others camps? (Although I understand that Dawkins has threatened to punctuate Eldridge's equilibrium.)
And for those contemplating a career in science, let them understand that this is how good science should be done.
Edited by AnswersInGenitals, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Percy, posted 09-23-2006 9:36 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by subbie, posted 09-23-2006 3:15 PM AnswersInGenitals has replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 31 of 75 (351619)
09-23-2006 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by subbie
09-23-2006 3:15 PM


Re: You forgot to mention....
This sounds like a cross between a MacFall post and a Donald Trump TV show: Kuhn Kant feyer Abend!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by subbie, posted 09-23-2006 3:15 PM subbie has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 33 of 75 (351641)
09-23-2006 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Archer Opteryx
09-23-2006 3:57 PM


I'm looking for an explanation for why evolutionists choose evolution? What is the reason? They come from all faiths and nationalities, yet they all accept the same lie. Why is this?
It's more economical than paying for a golden calf. And it's so much fun to walk around thinking I have spare jawbones tucked inside my ears.
AO, you have just got to keep up with the latest evolutionary theories. Since it has been well established that humans were well developed by the time of the dinosaurs, as proven by their co-temporous foot prints, we know that humans preceeded dinosaurs and reptiles. It is the reptiles that have spare human ears inside their jawbones. We now also know that the dinosaurs were driven to extinction by human over hunting. Those week attempts to blame it on an asteroid are just childish finger pointing to divert attention from ourselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-23-2006 3:57 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-24-2006 1:10 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 41 of 75 (351797)
09-24-2006 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Percy
09-24-2006 11:02 AM


Re: Exploring this more deeply
Evolutionists had logically deduced that if they were to gain control of the countries political institutions they had to put aside their theological (yes, evolution is just another religion) differences and unite with a common front that focused on a few 'hot button' issues. Hence, they initiated the secretive 'Sledge' strategy to pound their way into government control. The strategy has work with the election in 2000 of an avid evolutionist president and supporting congress. This president is now working to promote the Sledge strategy agenda with his 'Science Based Giving' initiative, his 'Spray the Course' stand to protect golfing ecology, and his directive that the federal government buy only Japanese cars to show his full support of the 'Toyoto Accords on Global Warming'. (He did make a slight misstep when he mistook these accords to be promoting Global Warmongering.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Percy, posted 09-24-2006 11:02 AM Percy has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 173 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 45 of 75 (351809)
09-24-2006 1:51 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Chiroptera
09-24-2006 1:43 PM


Tag line of wisdom.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." -- George Bernard Shaw
This great wisdom from GBS has guided my drinking habits all my life. We have so much to learn from our forbearers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Chiroptera, posted 09-24-2006 1:43 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024