What we clearly have here is a case of Harmonic Convergence. This is most readily evident at science conferences. When a current theory starts to get old and boring, scientists in the relevant field convene a conference (at taxpayer expense). Someone is chosen from the audience, usually the person with the heaviest and least intelligible accent, and he(never a she) steps up to the podium and propose a new theory. At this point, the audience breaks into cheers and applause as they show their complete accord with the proposed new theory. They often perform a wave at this point. The organizers of the conference then nominate the speaker for a Nobel prize and they all rush out for coffee and donuts.
The role of experimentalists should not be underestimated: in a real sense, they have the most challenging job - reinterpreting all their data to fit the new theory.
This process and all that converged harmony explains why science conferences are always completely devoid of controversy, disagreement, and rancor. Hey, when was the last time you saw Lamarkian evolutionists and Darwinian evolutionists sending suicide bombers into each others camps? (Although I understand that Dawkins has threatened to punctuate Eldridge's equilibrium.)
And for those contemplating a career in science, let them understand that this is how good science should be done.
Edited by AnswersInGenitals, : No reason given.