Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 4/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Stonehenge Limestone Conodonts
custard
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 27 (118965)
06-26-2004 5:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GarryDenke
10-15-2003 12:20 PM


gary writes:
c) E-SE Stonehenge Artifact Burial mound is foreign Carboniferous Waulsortian facies High Tor Limestone (Birnbeck Limestone) Formation rock, not local Cretaceous Seaford Chalk Formation rock. Source: 3/4 of the original complete circle of Counterscarp limestone first (1st) stone hedge of Stonehenge.
Two points:
1- Isn't it true if you take the reverse azimuth of the E-SE Artifact Burial mound, it is, in fact, W-NW?
2- I thought they found traces of copper sulfate and magnesium in the Birnbeck Limestone which indicated subsequent construction AFTER the initial counterscarp was erected?
G=c^3/mv
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m
I thought it was "6.6723647X 10^-11m?"
This message has been edited by custard, 06-26-2004 04:15 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GarryDenke, posted 10-15-2003 12:20 PM GarryDenke has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024