Terry and the Grand Canyon Age - A Judgement poll

I would like to poll the members here, to come to a judgement on who is coming to the correct conclusions at the Talk Origins board "Grand Canyon" topic, the first page of which is located here.Terry seems to be firm in his conclusion that the "new information" indicates that the entire Grand Canyon is much younger (700,000 years?), that what was previously thought.Me and my ally CSkeptic are of the opinion that the "new information" only concerns portions of the Grand Canyon, and makes no statement about the age of the canyon as a whole.{Added by edit: Please note - I am looking for a judgement of your opinions on what the "new information" of that topic means. I am not looking for a statement of personal beliefs. (Example: Terry is a YEC, but his is arguing a position that falls outside of the YEC framework. He is interpreting what the "new information" says, aside from his personal young earth beliefs).}Please respond with:
1) Terry's right
2) Moose's right
or
3) Don't know / no opinionAlso please list your position in the creation/evolution debate:
1) Young Earth Creationist
2) Old Earth Creationist
3) Evolutionist
or
4) Other (specify)Thank you,
MooseAlso by edit: I hope I've succeded in presenting this poll in an unbiased way.[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 10-15-2002]

I noticed that gap yesterday. I was hoping that no message gaps would show up. That opens up the possibility of administrative meddling.Between my having added an (early) edit to the first message, and that gap, this poll is probably terminally flawed.Moose