Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   D&D and satanisim
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 101 of 164 (189583)
03-02-2005 2:52 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by epoch9
01-14-2005 10:33 PM


Re: ...
Yaro writes:
I used to play D&D with a few friends. It was kinda geeky I guess, but hell if we didn't have fun. After all, using your imagination is always a great passtime!
So, I liked the game. But at that time, I was in a christian school BTW, alot of the other kids and teachers gave us funny looks, and commented on the greivous sin of Dungeons and Dragons.
Wow! Yaro, I never saw this thread before when you first posted it.
And now about the Christians. The mindset of belief is different for us. We believe that trusting in Gods Spirit to guide our imagination is preferable to imagining ones own life. It does not mean we are zombies, or unthinking zealots. It means that God always gets the final say...not a roll of some "fate" dice.
In the case of D&D, however, there were several gothic type "depressed" kids who got in trouble and were linked to D&D so it was naturally assumed that the D&D caused the behavior. This is not true as the kids were depressed beforehand. My close friends played D&D and I used to watch them. It is a roleplaying game and nothing more.
As any good Christian kid is taught, God assigns us our roles and duties in life...we do not choose our destiny. For one who was forced to go to Christian school and church and then later becomes a freethinker who is unshackled from the restraints of organized religion, imagining ones role, position, and influence becomes intoxicatingly empowering! Its a classic clash of the worldviews,here!
IRH writes:
I mean, the Erotic Fantasy book is actually a very comprehensive and in-depth examination of how D&D rules apply to sex and its related subjects. It's not porn by any stretch of the imagination - but a fundie would take it that way.
Yes, Fundies can be prudes but you have to remember our belief system. One follows "the devil" merely by refusing to bow to the authority of God. There is no middle ground. The devil asserts that ye shall be as gods...ye shall imagine and create your world and your destiny...ye shall be your own boss!
This appeals to freethinkers everywhere! Nobody wants to be accountable to a Deity!
To you, it matters little, because God is not a part of your belief.
To us, God is in charge regardless of what you or I believe. Absolute truth IS. Always WAS. Always will be. The serpant Was.(as Lucifer.) IS NOT because there is only one God...one Spirit...yet will come for those whose names are not written in the book of life.
Yaro writes:
Im a positive kind of person. I like playing epic type hero quests
Why is it always that humans like heroes who are in control and dislike heroes...such as Jesus...who are humble and bow to a superior source?
crashfrog writes:
It's this neutral portrayal of the occult that perhaps, many Christians object to.
There is no such thing as neutral. For or against. Black or white. No middle ground.
Indifferentwhitemale writes:
oh well, toodles
Toodles? Is not Toodles the High Priest of Insanity?
crashfrog writes:
I don't think any recreation is inherently evil or Satanic, or even inherently good and Godly. It's your relationship with your hobbies that determines whether or not they're good clean fun or dangerous addictions. They're all means of self-expression; that expression can be good for you, or it can be bad for you.
Well said. Except for that spell that turned you into a roadfrog....
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-02-2005 00:55 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by epoch9, posted 01-14-2005 10:33 PM epoch9 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2005 3:21 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 103 of 164 (189589)
03-02-2005 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by Rrhain
03-02-2005 3:21 AM


Re: ...
Rrhain writes:
So which is it? Can something be neither inherently evil or good, thus neutral, or is that impossible?
It is all in the intent. If someone who never had a belief in God was playing D&D or actually doing something mischevious like cursing people with a voodoo doll, for example...they would perhaps not have the intent of going against God since they never believed in God. IF..however...someone knew full well what they believed and then did something against that belief they would be more liable.
You can get away with calling Jesus an egomaniac since you see him as a mere man.
If I dissed Him like that, I would be cursing my God.
Rrhain writes:
Anybody who thinks he is god has something wrong going on.
Unless He actually IS God!
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-02-2005 10:28 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2005 3:21 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2005 4:11 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 105 of 164 (189593)
03-02-2005 5:31 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by Rrhain
03-02-2005 4:11 AM


Clarification rather than blatant contradiction
Rrhain writes:
Ah, so you're contradicting your earlier claim that neutrality is impossible.
No, Rrhainman! I am clarifying my position. Neutrality is impossible for a believer but not for a relativist who refuses to bow to any absolute not defined by themself.
I DO have to scramble a bit when faced with your logic. You are not stupid by any means, yet I liken the battle of wits with you as fighting with a man who wins lots of battles while losing the war.
You have claimed to be a "believer" in the past. How do you put it?
That you just believe in god but not MY god?
You have yet to describe your "god" to us, and I suspect it is because this god concept is really framed by your own logic. In other words, you are a deity within your own mind. If I am wrong, kindly explain your deity to the rest of us.
Many fundies who claim to know God make this mistake and are far worse than you are at it.
Am I correct in assuming that you believe human wisdom to be the origin of all concepts and beliefs?
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-02-2005 10:30 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2005 4:11 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Rrhain, posted 03-04-2005 3:20 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 110 of 164 (189973)
03-04-2005 4:17 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by Rrhain
03-04-2005 3:20 AM


Re: Clarification rather than blatant contradiction
I ask Rrhain:
Am I correct in assuming that you believe human wisdom to be the origin of all concepts and beliefs?
Rrhain replies:
"I refuse to say."
Phatboy writes:
(*Chuckle*)...this reminds me of a scripture...
If I may:
NIV writes:
Matt 21:23-27=Jesus entered the temple courts, and, while he was teaching, the chief priests and the elders of the people came to him. "By what authority are you doing these things?" they asked. "And who gave you this authority?" Jesus replied, "I will also ask you one question. If you answer me, I will tell you by what authority I am doing these things. John's baptism-where did it come from? Was it from heaven, or from men?"
They discussed it among themselves and said, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will ask, 'Then why didn't you believe him?' But if we say, 'From men'-we are afraid of the people, for they all hold that John was a prophet."
So they answered Jesus, "We don't know."
Then he said, "Neither will I tell you by what authority I am doing these things.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Rrhain, posted 03-04-2005 3:20 AM Rrhain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-12-2005 12:06 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 145 of 164 (458259)
02-28-2008 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by Son Goku
02-12-2008 12:03 PM


Re: Confused
Son Goku writes:
To be honest thinking a boardgame is evil is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
All that evil is is the absence of God. Imagination is freely chosen, but every decision we make involves a communion of sorts. We either commune with our inner conscience or we commune with the imagination of an author, a script, a movie, or a game. At least thats how I see it, anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Son Goku, posted 02-12-2008 12:03 PM Son Goku has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Vacate, posted 02-28-2008 12:44 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 148 by Larni, posted 02-28-2008 7:36 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 155 of 164 (458453)
02-29-2008 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by Larni
02-28-2008 7:36 AM


Re: Confused
No its the thinking process. Anytime someone attempts to imagine their own power and control, evil is afoot.
Im tongue-in-cheek on D&D being harmful. Its no worse than many other things people do that subconsciously Deifies our minds and causes us to become our own god, so to speak.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Larni, posted 02-28-2008 7:36 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by Larni, posted 02-29-2008 3:51 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 157 of 164 (458470)
02-29-2008 7:26 AM
Reply to: Message 156 by Larni
02-29-2008 3:51 AM


Got God?
I could well be serious. This whole idea of humans empowering themselves to move beyond the "myth" of God will eventually lead to more problems than cleaning up global fundamentalism will solve.
My argument rests on my belief that humans are incapable of making altruistic decisions beyond serving their own interests.
We are supposed to think and reason, but to dismiss the need for God in everyday life will prove to be a costly mistake.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Larni, posted 02-29-2008 3:51 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by Larni, posted 02-29-2008 9:45 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 159 by Granny Magda, posted 02-29-2008 11:04 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024