Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,412 Year: 3,669/9,624 Month: 540/974 Week: 153/276 Day: 27/23 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Destroying Darwinism
John
Inactive Member


Message 299 of 319 (44665)
06-30-2003 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 298 by Peter
06-30-2003 8:31 AM


quote:
More or less what I am saying though, is that Syamusu is right
in so far as you can view natural selection without variation
but that it is comletely pointless to do so.

Interesting... when I went through this with Syamsu, he was arguing that NS/ToE was faulty because it could not be applied to zero variation populations. (I took the position you take, and so did several other people.) Did I miss something?
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 298 by Peter, posted 06-30-2003 8:31 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by Peter, posted 06-30-2003 9:47 AM John has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024