Do I have a choice? (determinism vs libertarianism vs compatibilism)

This seems like a fairly good summation. I should have posted something similiar ages ago if my time wasn't so limited.I happen to believe you were free to post it for a number of reasons but these questions must be addressed first before a real answer can be deduced.In brevity answer these questions. You do not necessarily have to post the answers; they are for yourself of course.What area of the world were you raised in: industrial, rural, etc?What religion did your parents hold?What culture were you immersed in?Mention a few qualities or values that you were raised to have.This should or should not be more comprehensive but before one could decide whether one's action was free one must tell us or remember a little about one's own environment.If you are a traditional compatibilist you must answer this question for your action is free unless it is externally constrained.To add, your will must be made by a second-order volition: a second-order desire on which one wants to act upon.Edited by -messenjah of one, : heirarchal...

If free actions are uncaused then one is not responsible for them.This is a hole of indeterminism.

If "a random component" contributed to the decided outcome and if this "random component" did not exist then there would have been a different outcome?A good example of this would require much ingenuity and creativity.
I could provide one.In summation I find there being no responsibility if a "random component" contributed to the ouutcome and it is a variable that would change the outcome if removed.

I agree with you now. I appreciate your example.

If an action is uncaused then no one did it.