That's really the issue with determinism isn't it? Are we, or are we not responsible? I have a solution that you may not like, but it is a solution. The only one I know of.
We have free will, and we don't have free will. God's will is not free for us really, but we can have it His way. if we choose not to have it, then we can have our way (whatever horror that brings).
As for the the outcome, it certainly pertains to the concept of sin... I ask you to take it seriously!
This is the situation with mankind. We are who we are because of our environment and our DNA. Richard Dawkins, the renowned naturalist at Oxford said, "There is no such thing as right and wrong, we're all just dancing to our DNA." That is, by the way, a Biblical doctrine called 'the natural and sinful man'.
So in light of Dawkins statement, how much more profound and up to date... are Jesus' words, "You must be born again!"
If the world is falling apart as the Bible says, and if the creation is in decay and we along with it, then we half rightly ask, ”how is it, that I am condemned for being what I have no control to be otherwise?’ If the whole universe is collapsing simply because one component (mankind) has failed in his divine duty, then how is that my fault?
It’s a good question .
But that is not the issue. The issue is that God has reached down from eternity, into our universe of finitude and decay, and offered His own right hand to pull us out, and we refuse!
He offers us a new birth into a living hope and we refuse!
And we do so because we have made peace with our sin and learned very quickly to enjoy it. We have become allied with evil and enemies of God by choice.
We confidently insist that we have it under control and will find the answer apart from God. In the mean time, we intend to take all that we can ”now’, and plunder whatever pleasures we can experience at the whim of our own will.
"In every guilty man, there is some innocence. This makes every absolute condemnation revolting." Albert Camus
Is Mr. Camus absolutely condemning the concept of 'absolute condemnation'?
He is! And he proves that justice must be absolute by imperitive and displays the irrationality that motivates a crowd to choose ignorance over reason when given the clearest of two options. Such a choice is the lesser of the two threats to the will of the crowd, who chooses to live their own way, absolutely.
Matthew 27: 21 "Which of the two do you want me to release to you?" asked the governor. "Barabbas," they answered. 22 "What shall I do, then, with Jesus who is called Christ?" Pilate asked. They all answered, "Crucify him!" 23 "Why? What crime has he committed?" asked Pilate. But they shouted all the louder, "Crucify him!" 24 When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. "I am innocent of this man's blood," he said. "It is your responsibility!"
Such a scene is absolutism, condemning absolutism...
It is mankind, crucifying himself!