Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,336 Year: 3,593/9,624 Month: 464/974 Week: 77/276 Day: 5/23 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Three Kinds of Creationists
ooh-child
Member (Idle past 362 days)
Posts: 242
Joined: 04-10-2009


(2)
Message 52 of 432 (657318)
03-27-2012 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by bridgebuilder
03-27-2012 1:57 PM


Re: To Pressie
bb writes:
I do not accept everything Darwin said as the 'gospel'
Neither do the biologists who post here. Nor do any of the other folks you refer to as 'evolutionists'. I suggest you get up to speed on the advances science has made over the last 150+ years.
If you really pay attention to what you read here, you would benefit greatly. These people here are pretty smart! And some of them are actually theists, too, so you'd be in good company.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by bridgebuilder, posted 03-27-2012 1:57 PM bridgebuilder has not replied

  
ooh-child
Member (Idle past 362 days)
Posts: 242
Joined: 04-10-2009


(2)
Message 241 of 432 (657764)
03-30-2012 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 220 by 1.61803
03-30-2012 10:26 AM


Re: Supernatural 101
The particles are for all intensive purposes are undectectable and yet we have a inkling of they're existence, que no?
This phrase in bold is one of my pet peeves - it's 'intents and purposes'. Don't know why it drives me so crazy.
Sorry for the interruption. Carry on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by 1.61803, posted 03-30-2012 10:26 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by 1.61803, posted 03-30-2012 12:56 PM ooh-child has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024