Why I am creationist

There is no need to be a creationist to see of the flaws in evolutionary beliefs and reject them for what they are, a belief. Ultimately evolution is a religion masquerading as a science discipline

My understanding of science and religion is quite grounded, thank you.I dont know about the some people you refer to. But there are many well known evolutionists and ex-evolutionists who's observations that evolution is a religion which masquerades as a science discipline parallels my own.

Without seeing your post history I'm gong to make a guess thats about as strong as your rebuttals get, or not very.

Why dont you try responding to what I actually said rather than tearing down your strawman. Oh thats right, maybe you cant.There is no need to be a creationist (or a fundamental Christian) to see of the flaws in evolutionary beliefs and reject them for what they are, a belief. Ultimately evolution is a religion that masquerades as a science discipline .

Yeh, keep making that claim. You have yet to back it up with anything, and given your pattern that aint never going to happen.Now I dont know about you and your claimed credentials because those are never backed up with any bonafides either. So in lew of that I will go to just a few quotes of well known & established evolutionists on the issue of evolutionism being an ideology, a world view, and yes a religion.Darwinian atheist Michael Ruse has even acknowledged that evolution is their religion! Sir Arthur Keith, a famous British evolutionary anthropologist and anatomist.George Wald, prominent Evolutionist (a Harvard University biochemist and Nobel Laureate)

Actually what I find odd is that so many evolutionists are on a zealous crusade against any notion of a creator (except the ones made in their own image) .And for this cause they hijack science for their own ideological ends. In fact, you will fit this description quite aptly.

What are you psychic now? No just more strawmen, thats all you got there babe. Thats laughable and you are a scientist with a PHD? But dont stop there with your strawmen , lets see just how far you will go with your ever so weak and goofy analogies.

And I am supposed to take your word over what is published over several different sources with notes?If you are going to sling around a lpt of wild accusations, how about backing them up with independent & verifiable sources. Err uh, places like talkorigins wont qualify.Dr, You and your halfwitted diatribes, are not adequate.

You dont read to well do you. What he said was that I could not send the Inquisition yada yada yada after him. And whre he dredged that up from I have no idea, except maybe in his own head.Pretty sloppy there ol' chap, of both him and you. And I am supposed to take your word about what??Like I said before, neither creationism nor christianity are required to see all of the flaws in evolutionary beliefs and reject them for what they are, a belief. Ultimately evolutionism is a religion that masquerades as a science discipline .

No I would not agree that your your one vote invalidates that statement I made about so many evolutionists. My point however is thatneither creationism nor christianity are required to see all of the flaws in evolutionary beliefs and reject them for what they are, a belief. Ultimately evolutionism is a religion that masquerades as a science discipline .

Well then your experience as for all of us, is limited.Neither creationism nor christianity are required to see all of the flaws in evolutionary beliefs and reject them for what they are, a belief. And yes, ultimately evolutionism is a religion that masquerades as a science discipline .

Its pretty simple actually, You used the word lies and I asked you to back it up, you never did. Instead you spin and obfuscate. Typical, so predictable. If you and coyote are some of the heavyweights around here, well you bore me, and it's a fairly lame site then. Apparently though you need your echo chamber, and you have it here.In fact I think I'll propose a new topic for a name to this forum that more accurately reflects it tenor. I'll suggest it be changed to "Evolutionist echo chamber" with a sub title of "No Dissent allowed"

Thanks for your insight and input on this. However I already put my opinion in the proposed new topics area so I will have to take whatever flaming or mod action that comes out of that.