|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,872 Year: 4,129/9,624 Month: 1,000/974 Week: 327/286 Day: 48/40 Hour: 2/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Charismatic Chaos | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes: The reason that I believe this is not entirely due to the indoctrination of religious dogma by the churches that I have attended. Phat writes:
You were taught to expect a transformation. ... I was not transformed as much as I would have been taught to expect."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
As I pointed out, you felt what you were taught to feel.
And I actually felt one... Phat writes:
You helping people has never been the issue. The issue is that you deny what Jesus said. Despite you claiming that I never follow the message, I helped feed, clothe, and encourage people as well as visiting many in prison...for a period of nearly 20 years."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
It isn't my assertion. It's what you said, in Message 312: "The reason that I believe this is not entirely due to the indoctrination of religious dogma by the churches that I have attended." ringo writes:
That's quite an assertion coming from you. As I pointed out, you felt what you were taught to feel. You experienced what you were taught to expect.
Phat writes:
I don't dismiss your experiences. I dismiss your interpretation of your experiences - not because they are different from anybody else's but because they're the same. You interpret your experiences the same way as other fundies interpret their experiences because you have been taught to interpret them that way.
... you seem to dismiss any experiences I have had which differed from what you or anyone else has had. Phat writes:
On the contrary, I have a pretty good idea because I have heard the same interpretation from a lot of other people.
... you have no idea what I have believed, (apart from my words here at the Forum) the experiences I have had hearing actual voices (also heard by two others) and feeling my hair stand on end. Phat writes:
Well, there you go. Your pre-existing beliefs were supported. Confirmation bias.
Nor the confirming events which supported my otherwise illogical beliefs. Phat writes:
This is what bugs me most about believers. If there are things in life that are "unexplained", why do you insist on explaining them? And why do you refuse to accept any explanation but your own?
There are unexplained events in life... Phat writes:
That is not how debate works. You're supposed to debate the point made regardless of whether your counterpart believes it or not.
Jesus. (Whom you don't believe existed anyway, so I find it a waste of time to argue with you about it) Phat writes:
Maybe you really don't understand how absurd that sounds. You actually put the voices in your head before the only external source you have. What arrogance. What hubris.
ringo writes:
Unlike Tangle, I don't believe that Jesus was simply a character in a book. What Jesus says to me is more than some ancient written down scripture. The issue is that you deny what Jesus said Phat writes:
No he didn't. His beliefs were pretty similar to yours.
You and your Dad must have been a pair! He taught you how to read the bible in a common-sense way... Phat writes:
I turned it against stupidity and lies.
... and you turned it against organized religion and the church. Phat writes:
Resources have always been scarce. The way humans react is by getting together and producing more resources.
You will be surprised someday when your precious global socialists end up fighting along with the rest of the people as resources grow scarce. Phat writes:
I have not made any charge against you. I don't know why you're so defensive about that.
It will only be then when you may find your charge against me will apply to you. Phat writes:
No. He doesn't. He never did. But the principle attributed to Him is a good one.
He exists. Phat writes:
ringo is responsible for doing it himself. Nobody else is going to do it for him.
ringo is not in charge nor free to rebel without consequences. Phat writes:
It already does. Get a grip on reality. And no, global socialism will never work as long as human nature is as it is."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
foreveryoung writes:
No. The criterion for recognizing that somebody is in a (mind-control) cult is that they refuse to look at any sources outside the cult. It seems to me the criteria for labeling someone as being in a cult is simply believing the miracles in the bible are true."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
And you interpreted your experience the way you were taught to interpret it.
...it is not because of what we were taught so much as it is what we experienced. Phat writes:
And you simply can't grasp the idea that IF God exists, it would be an immense coincidence if He happened to be anything like the God you learned about.
They simply can't grasp the idea that God may be the same globally, Phat writes:
Among most groups of believers there is little controversy - Mormons, Scientologists, etc. One of the hallmarks of a cult is lack of controversy.
... but among these believers, there is little if any controversy. Phat writes:
Nonsense. Because there is only one explanation."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
That's circular.
No, we interpreted our experience based on what we felt while experiencing it. Phat writes:
On the contrary, it is much easier to encourage somebody to fit in by conforming with everybody else.
You can easily teach a parishioner to jump up and down and act excited, but you cannot give them the will to do it. Phat writes:
As I have said before, you'd have to have a monumental ego to believe that a god would seek you out and ignore billions of others.
What if He sought us out? Phat writes:
That has not been established. There's nothing in your "experiences" to indicate that. It's just something that your handlers have told you to parrot.
After all, there is really only one of him. Phat writes:
You experienced something. So did Muhammad. There's no reason to think your experience was different from his.
We experienced God. Phat writes:
And yet you don't even try to support your claim.
... God is good rather than schizophrenic and evil as you suggest scripture itself supports. Phat writes:
I'm not. I'm labellng your version as a cult.
Yet you cant label 2 billion Christians, or perhaps 500,000 of them who agree that Jesus is alive today, as a cult. Phat writes:
The context is Message 335: "This is what bugs me most about believers. If there are things in life that are "unexplained", why do you insist on explaining them? And why do you refuse to accept any explanation but your own?" Because there is only one explanation.
ringo writes:
I'd like to hear others. Nonsense Some other explanations include
Phat writes:
Nobody cares what you consider acceptable. I will then tell you whether I would consider them acceptable."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Yes, *your* version, just like the US is *your* country.
Oh so its *my* version now, is it? Phat writes:
They're every bit as likely as your God.
ringo writes:
Unlikely but hypothetically possible. other gods: Aten, Baal, Cthulu, Dagon... Zeus Phat writes:
They're more evidenced than your God. We know that life exists. And mathematically, it's almost inevitable that some of it is more "advanced" than we are. The only part that's unexplained is how they could have got here.
For now, aliens are simply unevidenced and unexplained. Phat writes:
Now that is crazy.
I consider many of such sightings demonic, but that is my own subjective conclusion. Phat writes:
We're a social species. Mass hysteria exists. Wikipedia ringo writes:
entirely possible on an individual level. mental illness Phat writes:
Why do you have that in your mind when I've told you so many times that it isn't true? I told you only yesterday that my father's beliefs were similar to yours. That's what I was taught. In my mind, you and jar both suppressed belief because you were taught to only have evidence of supportable belief."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Theodoric writes:
I'd be mad at the leprechauns if they existed - keeping the price of gold artificially high, little bastards. And why the hell would I be mad at some entity that does not exist."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
Many years ago (and many end-of-the-world scenarios ago) somebody said that in the future you would need a shotgun, a bicycle, canned sardines and gold coins.
... nobody would want to be the guy holding a lot of gold when guns are clearly outnumbering it bar for bar. Phat writes:
Nonsense. The likelihood of anything has nothing whatsoever to do with its usefulness, either real or imagined.
A God is "likely" only if that god is useful to you. Phat writes:
What on earth has need got to do with it?
Since you rely on "evidence" rather than need... Phat writes:
There IS mass hysteria. There always HAS BEEN mass hysteria. It has nothing to do with your silly apocalyptic scenarios. If such a scenario occurred, there would be mass hysteria. I'm saying that your "experiences" of god, your whole religion, might well be a form of mass hysteria.
Phat writes:
No. You really don't.
And you became a born again evidentialist...I get the picture. Phat writes:
Economies collapse on a pretty regular basis. It's never the end of the world. Apply your evidence to Climate Change+Economic Collapse Likelihood+Human Nature. What do you see in the next 100 years? Climate change won't be the end of the world either. Where I live will likely improve - but if we become a tropical paradise we'll have the damn tourists. And human nature is not what you portray."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Latino dad told to 'stay in Mexico'
What if the Mexicans tell him to go back to Spain? My ancestors came to Canada from Ukraine - but they were not Ukrainian. They moved to Ukraine from Poland - but they were not Polish. They moved to Poland from the Netherlands; I don't know how they got there - it was four hundred years ago. I always wonder how far back the "go back where you came from" is supposed to go. Maybe we should all go back to the Olduvai Gorge. But of course the racists don't care where you, "go back to." What they really mean is, "get away from here.""I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
I dismiss your dismissal. That was easy.
... I dismiss those assertions. Phat writes:
*cough* cult leaders *cough* ... far too many people follow the teachings of their Pastors without even reading the news or listening directly to what the "other side" says..."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Tangle writes:
That's too broad a definition. Racism implies that one group is superior to another group and assumed superiority results in the gathering of power to the "superior" group. You are not racist if you are powerless. ... they are terms that target individuals because of the colour of their skin and only because of the colour of their skin."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
jar writes:
You contradict yourself. You can not have racist behavior without power. You can be a helpless racist when powerless. But racism itself is not a problem rather it is behavior regardless of the cause that is the issue."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes: But I think its a rabbit trail off of Charismatic behavior in general anyway. OP writes:
He would find the same Pharisees that He found the first time - mouthing, "Lord! Lord!" while passing by the half-dead traveler on the road from Jerusalem to Jericho. Were Jesus to return tomorrow, would He find contemporary public Christianity to be applauded or would He see it as reprehensible?"I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tangle writes:
Yes, your dictionary definition says exactly what I said, "Racism involves one group having the power to carry out systematic discrimination....[/qs] Well ok if you need to be dictionary precise about it, I'll settle for racially prejudiced instead of racist."I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024