Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,783 Year: 4,040/9,624 Month: 911/974 Week: 238/286 Day: 45/109 Hour: 2/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Open Question For Jerry Falwell (and those who agree with him)
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3988
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 24 of 180 (289587)
02-22-2006 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Prism_tempest
02-22-2006 3:23 AM


Re: pagan point of view
Welcome, Prism_tempest! I look forward to hearing more from you. My own point of view is strongly pagan and shaman inflected.
"Love and do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law."
...has always worked for me.

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Prism_tempest, posted 02-22-2006 3:23 AM Prism_tempest has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3988
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 96 of 180 (312945)
05-17-2006 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by nator
05-17-2006 1:40 PM


Less is more the second time around
schrafinator writes:
We have been seeing less large-scale death from disease, catastrophy and war in recent centuries, not less, buz.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by nator, posted 05-17-2006 1:40 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by iano, posted 05-17-2006 4:48 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3988
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 103 of 180 (313124)
05-18-2006 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by anglagard
05-17-2006 10:47 PM


Re: Less is more the second time around
anglagard writes:
Iano {ABE - and Omnivorous were} correct in implying more people were killed in the 20th century due to war than in previous centuries
I was merely pointing out, in my obscure, fun-loving way, that the second occurrence of the word "less" in schraf's sentence was meant to be "more":
schraf writes:
We have been seeing less large-scale death from disease, catastrophy and war in recent centuries, not less, buz.
I meant to take no position otherwise (there's one death out there for everyone, after all, and I don't see the pacing or means as theologically relevant), but I find your summary persuasive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by anglagard, posted 05-17-2006 10:47 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by anglagard, posted 05-18-2006 8:26 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3988
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 111 of 180 (313357)
05-18-2006 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by anglagard
05-18-2006 8:26 PM


Re: Less is more the second time around
If obscure word play provokes responses as well done as yours was, I'll keep at it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by anglagard, posted 05-18-2006 8:26 PM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024