Who to believe , Ham or Ross?

but Schraf's question is not an "idiot game" but rather a reasonable request. If you wish to show how what you claim for the Bible is different than what she asked of you, you are free to do so. But it was a legitimate question and one you should address.

---

No one has mentioned banning you yet. LOLAnd you are free to simply wander off into the dark as most YECs do when presented with evidence. It's not unexpected behavior. That's fine, you're free to disagree. But that has nothing to do with the validity of Scraf's request. If you are incapable of supporting yet another of your unfounded assertions that will simply be obvious to the readers.But Schraf has made a resonable request and I have shown you a way to respond. All you need to do is show why what see requests is different than what you are doing with the Bible. If you cannot do that then it is reasonable to assume you are also unable to support your position regarding Biblical authors reliability.

---

If you have a response for Schraf, then respond to one of her posts, not mine. I am simply reminding you of Guidelines. If anyone wishes to continue showing how both Ross and Ham mislead, please do so.

---