Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who to believe , Ham or Ross?
Arkansas Banana Boy
Inactive Member


Message 130 of 223 (195847)
03-31-2005 6:27 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Faith
03-31-2005 1:47 AM


And we are the nattering nabobs of negativism I suppose.
I want to know if this "science can't know history" theme is something you picked up during or since posting dozens of times questioning the underpinnings of geology, or if it was a planned fallback position or intentional destination.
Looking at past events has a place in human endeavor. Numerous examples of forensics have been mentioned and ignored.
It has also been shown that looking at physical evidence can corroborate or refute historical accounts. Taking any historical text as exact reportage is frightfully naive. Requiring historical text as a foundation for any investigation puts you even more centuries behind and speaks volumes about your curiosity for the natural world.
ABB

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Faith, posted 03-31-2005 1:47 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by Faith, posted 03-31-2005 7:49 PM Arkansas Banana Boy has not replied
 Message 132 by Faith, posted 03-31-2005 7:52 PM Arkansas Banana Boy has not replied

  
Arkansas Banana Boy
Inactive Member


Message 194 of 223 (197091)
04-05-2005 9:12 PM


Ross
Ross has a relevant science degree and seems to require fewer miracles than YECs. His sort of OEC belief falls well short of theisic evolutionism.
I don't know much about Ham specifically other than seeming to remember that is is one of the "you weren't there so what do you know" crowd.
I find it interesting that the Trinity Broadcasting Network has two shows about creation. One is the YEC Carl Baugh's production in three good time slots. Ross has one show that plays at 4:30 in the morning. The conservatives at TBN seem to favor the YEC view.
Ross is interesting and shows an astronomical argument against a 6000 yr world, but he still balks at faunal succession and requires a few 'stocking' miracles now and again. I don't remember his version of geology. Some of his biology seems stretched but he beats the YECers in science hands down.
ABB

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by jar, posted 04-05-2005 10:01 PM Arkansas Banana Boy has replied
 Message 200 by PaulK, posted 04-06-2005 3:37 AM Arkansas Banana Boy has not replied

  
Arkansas Banana Boy
Inactive Member


Message 196 of 223 (197129)
04-05-2005 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by jar
04-05-2005 10:01 PM


Thanks for expanding
I've caught a few of Ross's shows but have yet to spend much time at Reasons to Believe website. Most of my impressions were from a recording of Ross vs Scott in a radio debate. I appreciate any insight as to his philosophy.
It is interesting that he considers God knowable. It seems that some YEC's consider God unknowable through the physical world and treat some parts of earth history as a mystery. Ross has fewer problems with time constraints, but I seem to remember more than a few clinkers in regards to mainstream evolutionary thought. I will look for that radio audio in my link list.
ABB

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by jar, posted 04-05-2005 10:01 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024