Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   RESURRECTION : THE EVIDENCE (+ Apostolic Martyrdom considerations)
wj
Inactive Member


Message 96 of 233 (91799)
03-11-2004 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Cold Foreign Object
03-11-2004 3:37 PM


Willowtree's bluff has once again been called and now he again descends into incoherent ranting and name-calling.
Are you genuinely this disconnected or someone trolling in the guise of a creationist?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 03-11-2004 3:37 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 233 (92279)
03-13-2004 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Cold Foreign Object
03-13-2004 4:06 PM


Willowtree, have you forgotten your medication again?
Instead of ranting and raving, how about answering the simple questions which have been directed at you. Asgara shows in messge #106 that you have not given any substantive evidence to support your assertion that the apostles were all martyred and that this supports the resurrection of Jesus.
The teeth pulling is by others trying to get any sort of verifiable evidence out of you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 03-13-2004 4:06 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 233 (92381)
03-14-2004 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by Cold Foreign Object
03-13-2004 4:06 PM


willowtree writes:
I had no intention of ever posting martyrdom evidence. That would give dead-enders undeserving access to desecrate the evidence and rob those who really want to know from pursuing the most important claim of all time and thus cheating them out of a "laying the last book down" experience concluding He rose.
You gutless wonder. What a hypocrite. I suppose it is consistent with your refusal to provide scientific evidence invalidating the theory of evoultion, which you claimed to have, when challenged.
Why don't you continue to hide your precious "evidence" under a bush and, to protect it further, don't even let on that you possess it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 03-13-2004 4:06 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

wj
Inactive Member


Message 206 of 233 (94806)
03-25-2004 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by Brian
03-25-2004 5:58 PM


Re: Day Confusion
I think a useful analogy might be to consider how we would describe an event which happened at 1am Tuesday in our contemporary time convention. Without the benefit of a clock etc. we would normally describe the event happening during Monday night. If you were talking about the event at 10am on Tuesday, you might refer to it as having occurred "last night". Tuesday morning would describe the period of time starting at sunrise on Tuesday. These are conventions which have survived since before the availability of accurate timepieces.
It appears that a similar convention operated in Jewish biblical times, but the day starting on the preceding evening.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Brian, posted 03-25-2004 5:58 PM Brian has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024