the underlying assumptions rig the debate

Strictly speaking all we can say from the experiments is that what we see at the far end is what we would see if the photon had taken a single path. What actually happens in between is not directly knowable Because it doesn't affect anything. And that is where your argument falls down - this phenomenon doesn't help your argument in the OP.
Edited by PaulK, : Provide reason for edit here. -->if (getCookie('UseUserTimeZone')) {printDateTime(1150870536000, 'US', '-', 4, 'AMPM');} else {document.write('06-21-2006 02:15 AM');}: Provide reason for edit here. ">http://

---

This message is a reply to:
	Message 240 by randman, posted 06-20-2006 6:44 PM		randman has replied

---

Replies to this message:
	Message 242 by randman, posted 06-21-2006 2:03 PM		PaulK has not replied
	Message 243 by randman, posted 06-21-2006 2:04 PM		PaulK has not replied

---

Profile

Reply    Peek

What kind of problems are you having? --AdminEdited by Admin, : Ask question.

[qs] Strictly speaking all we can say from the experiments is that what we see at the far end is what we would see if the photon had taken a single path.

[qs] Strictly speaking all we can say from the experiments is that what we see at the far end is what we would see if the photon had taken a single path.

Please describe the problem.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director

First, it didn't appear to post, and then when it did post, I tried editting it, and it wouldn't edit, and also, none of these posts contain my whole post either. It's strange. We'll see if this post works, but to be honest, I can't spend a lot of time here today.Edited by randman, : No reason given.