|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Definition please | |||||||||||||||||||||||
tsig Member (Idle past 2931 days) Posts: 738 From: USA Joined: |
But demons, well, sure demons are perfectly reasonable to believe in! And after all these posts I still don't know what any of these believers mean when thy speak of god or demons. Maybe when they use these words they mean exactly what the one that uses them wants it to.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Schraf writes: The key is to be found in the phrase of "disinterested observer". Most eyewitness claims of the supernatural are quite rightly made by interested observers...people who are themselves involved as opposed to detached. Which is more likely, phat; that humans are mistaken and self-deluded, but encouraged by their religious communities and cultures to believe in certain imaginary superforces (demons, aliens, Loki, fairies, animal spirits, etc.), or that there is a battle between humans and demons that only the believers seem to be able to detect? I am not saying that Demons cannot be proven..because I have been in what I believed to be a right mind and have observed the phenomena. You ask which is more likely. It depends on how involved one has been. If you actually were at one time a believer, you know that you were interacting with some spiritual and emotional circumstances.Looking at your life from a detached view, we could say that you were hungry for acceptance emotionally and that the church filled that need for awhile. I am quite certain that the church and the behaviors within it were far from perfect, but apart from all that you yourself had a relationship with God. Later, perhaps, you found a new and more rational group of friends. They were and are, perhaps, much more detached and rational. This is a more solid foundation for you and it is ok. My point is that if you ever DID have a relationship with God then you still do. Do you deny that you ever did? I realize that you question how it is all possible. Keep questioning, yet keep a place in your heart open for Him. All of the logic and reason in the universe will not fill that spot as He can.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Schraf writes: Much of that stuff is legend and storie...but much of the other legends are demons.
I am sure that phatboy, and many others would scoff at the idea that fairies, animal spirits, all of the greek and roman gods, the norse gods, the scores of Hindu gods, and innumerable other supernatural concepts actually exist. But demons, well, sure demons are perfectly reasonable to believe in! Actually, no. Logically, they are very difficult to believe in, as is God. God is easier, however.
I mean, come on! We live in an age of space exploration, computers, gene mapping, and very advanced science and technology, but there are seemingly many peple out there who still rely on demons to explain things they don't understand or are too uncomfortable with attributing to human behavior. I know! I don't blaim every unexplainable phenomena on demons and the spirit realm. I simply believe that this spirit realm is real. This realization is boggling! It means a lot of things. It means that my world view is akin to mental illness. It means that I am accused of blindness and willful ignorance by some respected science minds. I'm not trying to be a detached observer any more, because I simply cannot be detached. I have a different world view than many of you, and all that I ask is that we all love each other (I know its Valentines Day!) and attempt to understand each other. I claim no higher knowledge...just different experience!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1489 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Looking at your life from a detached view, we could say that you were hungry for acceptance emotionally and that the church filled that need for awhile. Here's a hint. Unless you're a mind reader, when someone tells you that they are or were a believer, take their word for it. You have absolutely no basis whatsoever to second-guess them. I was a believer. I'm not now. That I'm not now doesn't mean I wasn't then. I imagine its the same for Schraf.
My point is that if you ever DID have a relationship with God then you still do. Not only did we not then, you don't, now. God would have to exist to have a relationship with him.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
crashfrog writes:
Are you a mind reader?
Not only did we not then, you don't, now. God would have to exist to have a relationship with him.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4150 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: What's the first part mean to imply? you are not doing a riverrat and trying to suggest abuse or the like?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1489 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Are you a mind reader? Why would I have to be one to know if God exists or not?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2192 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
I am sure that phatboy, and many others would scoff at the idea that fairies, animal spirits, all of the greek and roman gods, the norse gods, the scores of Hindu gods, and innumerable other supernatural concepts actually exist. quote: LOLOLOLOL!!! No, it's ALL real!!! It's YOU who are denying the TRUTH!!! Loki and the vengeful animal spirits will come and devour your spirit when you die for refusing to believe in them!!!! When you TRULY BELIEVE and are on the CORRECT path and interpret and understand the holy books the RIGHT WAY (the way I do), only THEN will you be able to detect Loki and the vengeful animal spirits!!! LOLOLOL!!!
But demons, well, sure demons are perfectly reasonable to believe in! Actually, no. Logically, they are very difficult to believe in, as is God. God is easier, however.[/quote] No, I disagree. Everybody used to believe in demons, for a long time. It was the explanation everybody used for why bad things happened. It was what a superstitious, ignorant populace used to explain their world. Logically, it's easy to believe in demons. Empirically, however, there's no reason to believe in demons, just like there's no reason to believe in Santa Claus or the monster under your bed.
I mean, come on! We live in an age of space exploration, computers, gene mapping, and very advanced science and technology, but there are seemingly many peple out there who still rely on demons to explain things they don't understand or are too uncomfortable with attributing to human behavior. quote: Why? And how is this different from believing in the monster under your bed or Santa Claus?
quote: You are probably not mentally ill. To self-delude is to be human. To believe things because you have been taught them and are encouraged to believe them by a supportive, like-minded community is to be human. People used to be taught that Apollo/Helios pulled the sun across the sky in his firey chariot. Everybody in ancient Greece/Rome supported this belief for centuries. Your belief in demons is exactly like the Ancients' belief in that firey chariot.
quote: Can you be self-deluded, though, and is this delusion strengthened and supported by a community of like-minded people, even thought it is false?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Well, Schraff I know that I am unlike many of my church brethren because I discuss these things with you. Most of them believe in a literal word for word Bible. I believe in a thought for thought literalism but ascribe much of the teaching to parables.
Everybody used to believe in demons, for a long time. I know that most did, before the esteemed naturalists came and showed us the true light! Note this explanation of belief systems:
Probe Ministries writes:
Now..while I am a rationally minded person who does not "see" a spirit realm around me, I have experienced several undeniable situations where such a realm was observed.
Even though Naturalism in various forms is ancient, we will use the term to refer to a worldview that has had considerable influence in a relatively short time within Western culture. The seeds were planted in the seventeenth century and began to flower in the eighteenth. Most of us have been exposed to Naturalism through Marxism and what is called Secular Humanism. What are the basic tenets of this worldview? First, God is irrelevant. This tenet helps us better understand the term Naturalism; it is in direct contrast to Christian Theism, which is based on supernaturalism. Second, progress and evolutionary change are inevitable. Third, man is autonomous, self-centered, and will save himself. Fourth, education is the guide to life; intelligence and freedom guarantee full human potential. Fifth, science is the ultimate provider both for knowledge and morals.Probe writes: Indeed, the difference between me and you, Schraff, is that I have chosen Christian Theism as my world view, whereas you may have chosen one more akin to naturalism..(I don't know what yours is yet) "A worldview provides a model of the world which guides its adherents in the world." If your model of the world includes an infinite-personal God, as in Christian Theism, that belief should provide guidance for your life. If your model rejects God, as in Naturalism, again such a belief serves as a guide. Or if your model asserts that you are god, as in New Age Pantheism, yet again your life is being guided by such a conception. These examples should remind us that we are living in a culture that puts us in touch constantly with such ideas, and many more. They cannot all be true.
I can see why you would choose such a point of reference. Education and science HAVE debunked and overturned many ancient superstitions and allowed us a glimpse into how and why humans think and behave the way that they do. For me, however, there is a God, and He is personal. He is connected to the Bible...not just because t was the way that I was taught so much as because I have had intellectual confirmations of such a truth. Not to say that the book is inerrently perfect from a naturalist perspective. What then, do I say? That God is perfect and that my inspiration often originates with Him. This message has been edited by Phatboy, 02-15-2005 07:47 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22480 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phatboy writes: Now..while I am a rationally minded person who does not "see" a spirit realm around me, I have experienced several undeniable situations where such a realm was observed. Accepting the existence of demons on faith is one thing, believing you have evidence of demons is quite another. Are you applying scientific standards of evidence, or some other standard? If some other standard, then from the perspective of science your belief in demons is based upon faith, not evidence. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Percy writes:
Good point, Percy. This brings up the complexities of the society in which we live. The point has been brought up previously that a president, or a judge, or a teacher who has a Christian world view is more likely to base their philosophy and actions of their jobs upon that view. The Christians will respond by saying that they do not want teachers with pure naturalist, secular humanist, or other non Christian world views. In a free society such as ours, it may be best to have our children exposed to all of the different world views. Are you applying scientific standards of evidence, or some other standard? If some other standard, then from the perspective of science your belief in demons is based upon faith, not evidence. When I have talked to juveniles about what I believe, I explain to them why I believe it, yet I also teach them that my view is not absolute. All that is absolute about me is my love for God.It is never a question of me teaching what to believe so much as it is teaching them how to think, compare, and contrast. As to teaching about a belief in demons, I would not push this on anyone except to ask them to consider the possibility. It IS based purely on faith until and unless you add the experience.I would much rather that you understood Jesus first, anyway!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22480 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phatboy writes: As to teaching about a belief in demons, I would not push this on anyone except to ask them to consider the possibility. But you're pushing it here, because in Message 144 you said you'd observed the spirit realm:
Now..while I am a rationally minded person who does not "see" a spirit realm around me, I have experienced several undeniable situations where such a realm was observed. Do you really mean "observed"? Observed, as in the five senses observed? If so, can others (me, for example) also observe it? How would I go about observing it? Give me the instructions. I don't myself believe you've ever observed the spiritual realm, though I believe that you believe you have. This is at the heart of the point that Schraf has been hammering on. Your belief in demons is no different than an ancient Greek's belief in Zeus. Your belief that you've observed the spiritual realm of God is no different than an ancient Greek's belief that he observed the spiritual realm of Zeus. He was as sincere in his belief in Zeus as you are in God and Jesus. What we're asking you is the difference between you and this ancient Greek. Why was he wrong about his spiritual realm and you correct about yours? My original reply was triggered by your use of the word "observed". If by "observed" you meant a feeling in your mind that you interpreted as the spiritual realm then I have no objections. But if you really believe you observed the spiritual realm through one or more of your five senses then my gut level reaction is, "Tell me how!" --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Percy writes:
Percy, i may have talked of this here before, but there was one incident in particular where I distinctly and clearly heard a multiplicity of voices coming from someones mouth. That would involve the hearing. As for seeing people "fall over" and vomit, I discount those observations as emotional sensasionalism. Thus, the hearing is the one sense connected verification that I have.
My original reply was triggered by your use of the word "observed". If by "observed" you meant a feeling in your mind that you interpreted as the spiritual realm then I have no objections. But if you really believe you observed the spiritual realm through one or more of your five senses then my gut level reaction is, "Tell me how!"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22480 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phatboy writes: Percy, i may have talked of this here before, but there was one incident in particular where I distinctly and clearly heard a multiplicity of voices coming from someones mouth. That would involve the hearing. I originally responded because you said you had observed the spiritual world, but I see nothing in this that points conclusively or even tentatively to the spritual world as the source. Some possibilities:
Concluding that you've actually observed the spiritual world requires more than just, "I can't explain this." --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
OK, Percy...
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024