Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,840 Year: 4,097/9,624 Month: 968/974 Week: 295/286 Day: 16/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism is a belief (Why Atheists don't believe part 2)
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 38 of 302 (314984)
05-24-2006 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by iano
05-24-2006 10:01 AM


Re: Eyes wide shut
One aspect of objective evidence is that it must be apparant to all observers. But if the biblical position poses that we are all blind then observe we patently all cannot.
You do realize that this, like all religious proofs, is just circular reasoning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 10:01 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 8:20 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 41 of 302 (314990)
05-24-2006 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by iano
05-24-2006 6:38 PM


Re: On 'isms' and redness
I doubt it. If an atheist believed in nothing at all then you might have a case. But an athiest doesn't believe in nothing at all. He has beliefs in something - which just happen not to be a belief in God. The trouble about the word atheist is that it is God-centric. Whereas an atheist is something other than God-centric. The only shows in town are a belief in God or something else. An atheist has a belief in something else.
You just don't understand the meaning of the word atheism.
IF you don't believe in santa claus are you a a-santaist? how about an a-toothfairyist?
I don't understand why so many people just don't understand what atheism really is. It's NOT anti-theism. (although anti-theism is atheism).
There are plenty of things I just don't concern myself with and most of them aren't beliefs or belief systems.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 6:38 PM iano has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 43 of 302 (314992)
05-24-2006 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by DrJones*
05-24-2006 6:57 PM


Re: An off topic nitpick
While the Johhny Cash version is the superior one the song is originally by Nine Inch Nails.
That's BLASPHEMY! The NIN version is WAY better (NIN RULES)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by DrJones*, posted 05-24-2006 6:57 PM DrJones* has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 45 of 302 (314997)
05-24-2006 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by iano
05-24-2006 8:20 PM


Re: Eyes wide shut
You are trying to make an analogy between blindness and sight to non-belief and belief/faith/bible/etc.
This is a false analogy.
I can show someone with sight a red object and we can agree it's red.
Two believers can't show each other their evidence even though they supposedly have it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 8:20 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 9:06 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 46 of 302 (314998)
05-24-2006 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by iano
05-24-2006 8:24 PM


Re: Relative "believisms"
How does one define a particular word I wonder? With other words no doubt. Very circular that.
hahahaha, but no... that's not circular reasoning.
It's actually a hierarchical system.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 8:24 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 9:06 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 49 of 302 (315054)
05-25-2006 1:27 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by iano
05-24-2006 9:06 PM


Re: Relative "believisms"
There is actually an answer to that question... but I'm probably not fit to explain it as it's pretty complicated. I read this whole book on linguistics much and I don't remember exactly how to explain it. (it has to do with the evolution of language).
But you do pose a good question. If you are ever interested I'd be willing to contribute to a thread about it
Cheers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 9:06 PM iano has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 50 of 302 (315055)
05-25-2006 1:29 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by iano
05-24-2006 9:06 PM


Re: Eyes wide shut
Just like me and Faith can compare notes
No, it's different.
You and faith compring notes is more like two friends discussing their opinions of a book or a movie. It's a very subjective thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by iano, posted 05-24-2006 9:06 PM iano has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 67 of 302 (315184)
05-25-2006 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by iano
05-25-2006 6:38 PM


Re: no objective redness comcept available
If red is not objective and we must revert to wavelength could you explain to me how red could ever be made objective to a blind man? You can explain the science alright: 100 units = Red and 200 units = blue. What has now become objective. 100 units? 200 units? Now lets figure out how 'unit' can be made 'objective' to this blind man. Can I suggest infinte regression at this point?
This was already pointed out as a false analogy.
The blind man is irrelevant because an objective measurement can made by an instrument to show the wavelength. There is no subjective component because the instrument has no perceptions/conciousness/etc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by iano, posted 05-25-2006 6:38 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by iano, posted 05-25-2006 7:54 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 78 of 302 (315260)
05-26-2006 8:53 AM


Back On Topic
Wow, amazing that we were lead off topic in yet another discussion about the nature of reality. I'm shocked.
In any case Atheism is not a belief any more than "off" is a TV channel or "clear" is a color.
The TV analogy is particularly good in my opinion. All the various relgions are the channels while atheism is having the TV off. If you understand the TV analogy, you will understand why Atheism really isn't a belief (or at least not a belief system of any sort).
PEACE OUT

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 92 of 302 (315413)
05-26-2006 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by PurpleYouko
05-26-2006 1:12 PM


Re: On 'isms' and redness
Like I said before purple.
Calling atheism a belief is like calling off a TV channel

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by PurpleYouko, posted 05-26-2006 1:12 PM PurpleYouko has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by macaroniandcheese, posted 05-26-2006 1:52 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 96 of 302 (315453)
05-26-2006 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Minnemooseus
05-26-2006 2:36 PM


Re: Athesism vs. Anti-theism
Good post Moose (and one that has to be repeated every few months).
I think a good way to explain atheism to a lot of people is how I think (and hopefully I'm not unique).
So atheism is a lack of belief in god... but even more I simply don't care if god exists or not. I care about the existence of god about as much as I care about last night's WNBA game. Whether there is a god or not is totally irrelevant to my existence so I just don't care because it has zero impact on my life. I don't even concern myself with it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Minnemooseus, posted 05-26-2006 2:36 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by iano, posted 05-26-2006 4:15 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 98 of 302 (315457)
05-26-2006 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by iano
05-26-2006 4:15 PM


Re: Athesism vs. Anti-theism
You apply the same logic to your health care plan as you do to this no doubt? Die/Sickness... they can happen at any time. It pays have an insurance policy
I am perfectly content with whatever happens when I die. I made my peace with life and death years ago (which is strange, because I'm only 29).
Since there is no evidence at all of any sort of afterlife I'm certainly not going to worry about it now.
In any case if by some strange twist of fate there is a god or god(s) or aliens we meet after we die I am perfectly content to be judged on my actions.
A god that needs to be worshipped is an egotistical loser in any case.
I've never understood why some people paint god to be like some two-bit 3rd world dictator.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by iano, posted 05-26-2006 4:15 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by iano, posted 05-26-2006 4:29 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied
 Message 103 by CK, posted 05-27-2006 5:31 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 100 of 302 (315463)
05-26-2006 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by iano
05-26-2006 4:29 PM


Re: If you want to walk on water...
Another works-merchant comes out of the closet. This would all be just dandy so long as "what you did" was the measure the the twist-of-faith-god-in-your-own-image-and-likeness happens to use. It could be any number of things. Why pick on this one?
Actually you are totally missing the point. I don't beileve in god. I don't care if god exists. And if the way I live my life isn't good enough for some god/god(s)/aliens then they can go fuck themselves.
I live my life by what I know is right. And what I know is that many flavors of christianity teach things that are morally wrong. (although not all, I see a lot of common ground with guys like Phat or Jar).
Another reason I am an atheist is that I REFUSE to compromise what I know to be right and wrong to accomodate some bullshit book written by people who thought the earth was flat a few thousand years ago. Intolerance is wrong.. and the bible preaches intolerance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by iano, posted 05-26-2006 4:29 PM iano has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024