Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,336 Year: 3,593/9,624 Month: 464/974 Week: 77/276 Day: 5/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where Faith Comes From in the "moderate" Christian religions
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 4 of 132 (513117)
06-25-2009 4:39 AM


personally I believe spirituality is built into all humans...this is why so many have some belief in a God/gods of some sort.
Even those who dont believe in God/gods, they do believe in something that caused our being, ie evolution....this shows that even if one doesn't believe in a God/gods, they still yearn for knowledge, meaning and wisdom. We all do this because IMO we were created in the image of God and therefore we possess his qualities and creative ability.
So besides the bible, faith/belief is a part of our nature. And how we choose to exercise that need is a very personal thing based on our perceptions,life experience and environment.

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Woodsy, posted 06-25-2009 6:51 AM Peg has replied
 Message 26 by lyx2no, posted 06-26-2009 8:47 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 27 by Theodoric, posted 06-26-2009 8:59 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 31 by Rahvin, posted 06-26-2009 12:29 PM Peg has replied
 Message 54 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-27-2009 6:06 PM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 19 of 132 (513187)
06-26-2009 3:24 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Woodsy
06-25-2009 6:51 AM


Woodsy writes:
This doesn't make the beliefs true, nor is it evidence that they are true. Personal experience is not valid evidence of the supernatural, as it could merely be internally generated.
thats the point i thought i was making.
Woodsy writes:
If, as you say, this tendency is innate, the fact that religion is widespread is not evidence for the truth of religion either.
Some other kind of evidence needs to be presented to be convincing to non-believers.
So besides the bible, faith/belief is a part of our nature. And how we choose to exercise that need is a very personal thing based on our perceptions,life experience and environment.
This doesn't make the beliefs true, nor is it evidence that they are true. Personal experience is not valid evidence of the supernatural, as it could merely be internally generated.
If, as you say, this tendency is innate, the fact that religion is widespread is not evidence for the truth of religion either.
Some other kind of evidence needs to be presented to be convincing to non-believers.
i thought the OP was asking where faith came from if it didnt come from the bible...many people have faith without it being based on religion, so i though the OP was asking why this is so.
i'll have to re-read it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Woodsy, posted 06-25-2009 6:51 AM Woodsy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-26-2009 4:51 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 23 by Woodsy, posted 06-26-2009 6:35 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 44 of 132 (513268)
06-27-2009 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Woodsy
06-26-2009 6:35 AM


woodsy writes:
I have read that religious experiences can be stimulated electrically, so your observation that they seem to be built in seems to be correct.
I have not had one of these experiences, but I gather that they can be very convincing. I wonder if faith arises in part from some sort of flaw in the wiring of our brains.
(apologies for earlier derail)
no problem, i assumed you were correct because i often misread/misinterepret/misunderstand many posts lol
im sure electrical stimuli can produce such experiences too, but i've never had a religious experience in the sense of seeing something supernatural or hearing voices etc. I have seen events in my life move in certain directions which to me appeared to be from a higher level...for example things that I know i could not have achieved or survived without help from a higher power.
This is why i dont believe faith is merely 'physiological' I do believe it has to do with being made in Gods image and with a dependence on him. Of course if i didnt believe in God, i'd probably try to find a physiological reason for it because it does seem to be a very illogical phenomenon in a physical world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Woodsy, posted 06-26-2009 6:35 AM Woodsy has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 45 of 132 (513270)
06-27-2009 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Theodoric
06-26-2009 1:17 PM


Re:
theodoric writes:
Evolution is not about anything that "caused our being". She should know that. You know that. What she said is wrong. In a debate format glaring errors like this should be exposed for the misrepresentations they are. This was not some simple slip by Peg.
it certainly wasn't a slip, you are most correct.
evolution does not require a God, it happened miraculously, we came from existing stock, we were not individually created.
Evolution DOES contradict the basic bible teaching that God created us in his own image. If i'm wrong on that, show me. Or are you saying that evolution does not say God did not individually create Mankind?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Theodoric, posted 06-26-2009 1:17 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Aware Wolf, posted 06-27-2009 10:37 AM Peg has replied
 Message 51 by lyx2no, posted 06-27-2009 2:36 PM Peg has replied
 Message 70 by Theodoric, posted 06-28-2009 7:08 PM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 46 of 132 (513271)
06-27-2009 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Rahvin
06-26-2009 12:29 PM


Rahvin writes:
This has given rise to a massive variety of mythology over the course of human history that was made up to answer questions people of the time had no way of answering accurately. The Sun was Apollo's polished chariot wheel. God made man from dust. Bad things happen to you because of sins committed in your previous lives. Sacrificing a human being each day ensures that the Sun will rise tomorrow.
are you referring to 'faith' and 'belief' as one in the same? I ask because when I talk about faith, i dont mean a belief system. I view them separately. By way of illustration...a bus/train/car has two components, the driver and the machine. In this case, the machine is the belief system (buddism/christianity/islam) and faith is the driver. Its what motivates one to carry out the requirements of the belief system.
Rahvin writes:
Personal satisfaction is the key, however. It's what allows the moderates to maintain faith even with no real reason to do so. It's subjective, it's arbitrary, and it's wishy-washy, but regardless of the relative accuracy of two potential answers, most people will still choose the answer that is most personally satisfying.
I agree with you on that. Many people choose what is most convenient for them. Whereas, it should always be based on truth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Rahvin, posted 06-26-2009 12:29 PM Rahvin has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 59 of 132 (513348)
06-28-2009 6:36 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Aware Wolf
06-27-2009 10:37 AM


Re:
AwareWolf writes:
It's not possible that you haven't heard of the idea that evolution is the means that God used to create us in his own image. Are you dismissing that idea out of hand?
I have heard that assertion, but I dont agree with it. I hold to 'creation by God' just as the bible says. Animals were created according to their kinds, and man was created in Gods own image.
If i'm told that I should believe in evolution because its taught in science and science is 100% accurate, Should I believe it? Are all beliefs 100% accurate and true just because it is accepted by most people and taught in school???
If you lived at the time when the beliefs of Greek philosophers were treated as 100% accurate, then you probably would have believed that the earth was flat and held up by elephants riding on a giant tortus, or that the stars were holes in the sky...or perhaps you would have believed that humans were born from spontaneous generation and evolution.
In the 5th century BCE, the Greek philosopher Empedocles believed in spontaneous generation, gradual evolution of organisms and survival of the fittest. Not long after that, Aristotle taught that "man is the highest point of one long and continuous ascent." They started the idea of evolution and it certainly wasnt based on the scientific method then, nor do I believe it is today.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Aware Wolf, posted 06-27-2009 10:37 AM Aware Wolf has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by anglagard, posted 06-28-2009 7:20 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 62 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-28-2009 7:22 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 60 of 132 (513349)
06-28-2009 6:54 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by lyx2no
06-27-2009 2:36 PM


Re: Faith Done Me Wrong
LOl
well you go right ahead and deny me, i'll wave you down when they're not looking
But if you dont think evolution contradicts the biblical claim that God created life, and man, please explain it to me.
If evolution means that we've descended from a common ancestor, how does this NOT contradict the biblical claim that God create the man in his image? I dont get it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by lyx2no, posted 06-27-2009 2:36 PM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by lyx2no, posted 06-28-2009 9:11 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 68 by Woodsy, posted 06-28-2009 9:40 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 63 of 132 (513352)
06-28-2009 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Dr Adequate
06-28-2009 7:22 AM


Re:
No, my beliefs are not evidence, im merely stating a fact
the fact is that the idea of evolution began with greek philosophers who did not use science as a basis for the belief
the idea has 'evolved' over time to what we have today. When it was rehashed by Darwin it caused a outrage in religious circles because it clearly was in conflict with the idea that God had created each species.
stupid i know, but a fact none the less.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-28-2009 7:22 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by anglagard, posted 06-28-2009 7:57 AM Peg has replied
 Message 69 by Hyroglyphx, posted 06-28-2009 10:56 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 77 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-28-2009 10:14 PM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 65 of 132 (513355)
06-28-2009 8:15 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by anglagard
06-28-2009 7:57 AM


Re:
anglagard writes:
I am still puzzled by your dogmatism. Why do you hate science and democracy? Is it family, the local tribe, or has some charismatic come between you and God?
dogmatism?
i hate science and democracy???
im sure evolution doesnt cover ALL the sciences. just because i dont believe in evolution doesnt mean i dont believe in other sciences.
And where does democracy come into it??? Am i undemocratic because i dont believe in evolution???
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by anglagard, posted 06-28-2009 7:57 AM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by anglagard, posted 06-28-2009 8:39 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 78 of 132 (513486)
06-29-2009 6:23 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by Dr Adequate
06-28-2009 10:14 PM


Re:
DrAdequate writes:
No, you are telling a lie. You pretended that evolution today is not "based on the scientific method". Every time you say this, you are spewing falsehood out of your mouth,
my understanding is that the scientific method is to observe what happens and based on those observations form a theory as why it happens then test the theory by experiments to see if the predictions based on the theory are fulfilled ie observe, theorize, test, conclude
Is that the scientific method?
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-28-2009 10:14 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by slevesque, posted 06-29-2009 6:36 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 81 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-29-2009 11:34 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 87 of 132 (513697)
07-01-2009 6:01 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by Dr Adequate
06-29-2009 11:34 AM


Re:
DrAdequate writes:
Remember that an experiment is only an observation made under artificial circumstances.
You do not test a theory by experiments
it seems that you are saying the scientific method does not use or require experimentation as a means of establishing a fact
is that correct???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-29-2009 11:34 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-01-2009 6:48 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 89 of 132 (513706)
07-01-2009 6:55 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by Dr Adequate
07-01-2009 6:48 AM


Re:
DrAdequate writes:
There are innumerable truths which rest solely on observation, and on which no artificial set of circumstances produced by a scientist can possibly have any bearing.
do you believe this to be the same principle where evolution is concerned?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-01-2009 6:48 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-01-2009 7:02 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 91 of 132 (513711)
07-01-2009 7:12 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Dr Adequate
07-01-2009 7:02 AM


Re:
DrAdequate writes:
While there are some relevant experiments in evolutionary biology, the establishing of historical facts can rarely if ever depend on them.
how is evolution established if not by experimentation?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-01-2009 7:02 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-01-2009 7:28 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 97 of 132 (514000)
07-03-2009 5:43 AM


I find it hard to believe that one can accept that the TOE is established based purely on observation
sounds more like a wild stretch of the imagination rather then solid scientific investigation
One question i have with regard to that...if evolution is accepted so easily, why is it so objectionable to accept a creator?
If neither can be proved with scientific investigation, why is one theory accepted and the other not?

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Rrhain, posted 07-03-2009 6:23 AM Peg has replied
 Message 99 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-03-2009 6:49 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 100 of 132 (514006)
07-03-2009 7:08 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by Rrhain
07-03-2009 6:23 AM


Rrhain writes:
The official position of the Catholic church is that evolution is the only scientific explanation we have for the diversification of life we have. Are you saying that Pope doesn't believe in god?
he might believe in God, but if he believes that evolution caused the great variety of life on earth, then can it be said that he believes the bible?
Did he miss Genesis Chpt 1 in theology school?
Rrhain writes:
We have seen evolutionary change from the smallest shifts to new species, genera, even orders and families, all right in front of our eyes.
Why are you demanding that we lie about this?
the bacteria may behave that way, but it does not explain all life on earth. It simply shows how flexible these germs are and surely explains why they survive where nothing else can.
Rrhain writes:
Simple question: What would it take for you to say that evolution has been shown? What experiment would have to be run and what outcome would it have to have in order for you to conclude that it was evolution?
Be specific.
I would need to see one species produce a completely different species. I would need to see life spring from the ground with not intervention required.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Rrhain, posted 07-03-2009 6:23 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-03-2009 7:42 AM Peg has replied
 Message 121 by Theodoric, posted 07-03-2009 11:05 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 122 by Rrhain, posted 07-03-2009 5:33 PM Peg has not replied
 Message 124 by Rrhain, posted 07-03-2009 6:00 PM Peg has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024