Phat writes:
Edward Welch talks about cravings in his book. He says that there are different types of cravings and that they can occur at different times. Example:
1) while abstaining and sober
2 after taking the first drink and then wanting more
3) when physically dependant on the substance.
Well, Phat, I can say I have two of three types of cravings. I crave a drink, a smoke, a food, coffee, etc. I crave them out of the blue, and also after having indulged in a sampling.
What do cravings have to do with addiction, really? I can give in to cravings and not be an addict. According to the best Catholic doctrine I can drink, smoke, probably do recreational drugs, gamble, whatever, and it is not sinful.
An addiction very well may be. Your answer, Welch's really, is that we are not worshipping God correctly.
OK. How is that? Ringo is partly on the money. First you have to determine what an addiction is. It is not merely a repetitive behaviour. It is a behaviour that is having serious negative consequences on a person's health or desired life style. The 'sin' aspect comes into play when a person believes that they were made to fulfill a purpose, to live a godly life, to be the best they can be. Many addictions rob a household of money that is sorely needed. This is strongly against 'do unto others'. Other addictions in the long or short term are basically lethal, which makes them akin to murder of self...suicide. An addict has to take stock of the damages, even if the addiciton is not harmful in the common usage, but gets in the way of who they want to be ideally, or who they feel God wants them to be.
Forget about sin, Phat, throw it away.
Believing something is a sin may only add more motive to give it up. Or...not.
Point is, recovery comes down to self motivation, whether it be because of God, a group, the pure desire for a better life, the realization of hurting people, etc. What motivation 'works' for people? If you want to say the AA Christian motive works, fine. I think that the knowledge of God can help some people to replace their focus and feel capable. I am seriously curious what this does for those of us who already know God? Isn't the implication that we should never have given in to addiciton in the first place?
What is really the deal is how far we take the biological aspect. If belief in God was not enough to prevent bad behaviour, not an occasional 'sin' but a total ignorance of what we stand for...then how do we believe some 12 steps will recoup us? If it is NOT because a person ignores their beliefs that they become addicts, then we have still to go to the 'addictive personality' route.
IOW..."I am Christan, but something in my nature makes me desire alcohol against my deepest wishes'.
Either this is true, and you need to have a type of couseling that deals with the physical part...or this is false, and you need to reevaluate your faith.