Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,803 Year: 4,060/9,624 Month: 931/974 Week: 258/286 Day: 19/46 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Separation of church and state OK to Christians?
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 6 of 39 (193819)
03-23-2005 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Ben!
03-23-2005 6:37 AM


A few points I think need to be considered.
It's my understanding that it's both important for people of the church to live moral lives,...
IMHO it's important for PEOPLE to live moral lives.
... but also to avoid participation in amoral activities / governments.
Not really. There is nothing wrong specifically with amorality. It comes down when speaking of Governments, to intruding on anothers right or wellbeing. In addition it's good for everyone to participate in Government.
Also, it's important to evangelize--to try and help people know Jesus and God, and to help them move away from their amoral behavior.
Again, I don't think that's quite right. It's good to help folk move towards moral behavior but the best way to do that is by example, not fiat.
The big thing I'd object to in your initial statement is that Secular implies Amoral? Almost by definition, Government will be involved with the issue of right and wrong.
How can it be OK to accept a separation of church and state?
Two entirely different spheres.
Religion relates to how GOD and the individual will get along. If you are by whatever standards going to hell, that is between you and GOD.
Government relates to how you and I will get along. The purpose of Govermnment (not the sole purpose but a major one) is to sanction my behavior such that it does not harm you.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Ben!, posted 03-23-2005 6:37 AM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:35 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 12 of 39 (193870)
03-24-2005 1:21 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Ben!
03-24-2005 1:15 AM


The second commandment speaks against freedom of religion.
What makes you think that?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:15 AM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:28 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 19 of 39 (193883)
03-24-2005 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Ben!
03-24-2005 1:28 AM


Well, the exact translation varies from version to version. But the concept of GOD and Gods is not as simple as that might lead folk to think. In some other thread we can go over the various ways GOD and GODs are seen and depicted in the Bible.
But even if that were true, it is a message to GOD's people. It says the Jews must worship only one diety, or at a minimum, not rank another diety above him.
It is certainly not something opposed to freedom of religion, even under the most conservative, most literal (even though most who call themselves Literalists are the least likely to take the Bible Literally), most Evangelical interpretation it wouold not oppose freedom of religion. Others are free to worship however they wish, they're wrong and damned and going to hell and gonna burn baby burn, but they are free to screw up.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:28 AM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by arachnophilia, posted 03-24-2005 1:56 AM jar has replied
 Message 21 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:57 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 22 of 39 (193894)
03-24-2005 2:03 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Ben!
03-24-2005 1:35 AM


Re: A few points I think need to be considered.
My question is, since the Christian God judges people, since people receive punishment or reward from God, doesn't that make "good and bad", "right and wrong" the domain of religion?
Only between you and GOD and most likely only after you're dead.
And no, good and bad are not the domain of religion.
Let me try to expand on that slightly because in some ways Christianity is quite different from the other two Judaic Religions in that regard.
Judaism and Islam are deeply involved in interpersonal relations. One of the funtions of both Rabbi and Imam is in settling disputes. When you read the Koran or Tanakah you find sura after sura, passage after passage, dealing with interpersonal relationships. If your brother dies you gotta bang his widow. You can charge interest to an infidel but not a believer. They go into very great depth on what you can eat, what you can wear, how you treat different classes, who you can or cannot associate with, how you should wear your hair, when and how to pray and on and on.
Christianity is quite different. Jesus boiled all the suras, all the passages down to the essence, Love GOD and love others as you love yourself. Christianity makes some basic assumptions.
The first is that you must love yourself. Often that last part of the two part commandment gets neglected, but it's important. GOD wants you to love and be happy with yourself.
Next, GOD assumes you're an adult and have some idea of what you like,how you like to be treated. Instead of a precise set of rules, good an dbad, right and wrong, he says, "Look, treat other folk the way you'd like to be treated". This is important so we'll come back to it in a second.
Finally, GOD says "Love GOD and show your love not by what you say, but how you behave."
Now let's head back towards the idea of a Christian supporting a Secular Government. Would the Christian like being forced to deny his Christianity, or pray to some other GOD? If not, if the Christian would not like to be treated that way, then GOD says you cannot treat OTHERS that way. For a Christian to try to force Christianity on others would be to violate the very commandments we were told to obey.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:35 AM Ben! has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 23 of 39 (193895)
03-24-2005 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by arachnophilia
03-24-2005 1:56 AM


Yeah, and GOD is tied to the land and if he is needed somewhere else you gotta load up an ox cart with Godly soil and haul it to the new location. LOL

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by arachnophilia, posted 03-24-2005 1:56 AM arachnophilia has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 25 of 39 (193897)
03-24-2005 2:07 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Ben!
03-24-2005 1:57 AM


Well, look over message 22 and see if that helps. And please, always feel free to ask any questions. Look, you're already damned, what you got to lose?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Ben!, posted 03-24-2005 1:57 AM Ben! has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 33 of 39 (193989)
03-24-2005 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by macaroniandcheese
03-24-2005 8:34 AM


And he Loved to Party.
His first miracle was not turning wine into water.
But heading back towards the topic, I really believe that the concept of a Theocracy, any theocracy, in this life is basically anti-Christ.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-24-2005 8:34 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by arachnophilia, posted 03-24-2005 8:39 AM jar has not replied
 Message 36 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-24-2005 8:45 AM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024