Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,820 Year: 4,077/9,624 Month: 948/974 Week: 275/286 Day: 36/46 Hour: 1/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the book of job, and an unjust god
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 136 of 181 (170849)
12-22-2004 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by dpardo
12-22-2004 2:48 PM


dpardo
Their first mistake was attacking God's people.
I do not think that is the case since they were attacking people who did not believe in their god. Perhaps they were under direction of their god to do so and were thereby justfied by your logic.They erred in not completely eliminating the entire people.They were,in that sense,merciful compared to the Israelites.
Of course you will counter with the silly claim that the Israelites had the one true god. sigh

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 2:48 PM dpardo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 3:10 PM sidelined has replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 137 of 181 (170857)
12-22-2004 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by sidelined
12-22-2004 3:04 PM


Sidelined writes:
I do not think that is the case since they were attacking people who did not believe in their god. Perhaps they were under direction of their god to do so and were thereby justfied by your logic.They erred in not completely eliminating the entire people.They were,in that sense,merciful compared to the Israelites.
You have stumbled upon a great truth.
They were under the direction of their god- Satan.
Again, the Amalekites were not merciful, the Israelis were able to drive them off but, not before the damage was done.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 3:04 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 4:31 PM dpardo has replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 138 of 181 (170858)
12-22-2004 3:15 PM


Deleted duplicate post.
This message has been edited by dpardo, 12-22-2004 03:15 PM

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 139 of 181 (170859)
12-22-2004 3:15 PM


If you are not living for and serving God, you are living for and serving Satan.
Look at your life and see if this is not the case.
What are the fruits of our lives?
What do they evidence?

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by Dan Carroll, posted 12-22-2004 3:23 PM dpardo has replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 181 (170866)
12-22-2004 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by dpardo
12-22-2004 3:15 PM


If you are not living for and serving God, you are living for and serving Satan.
Look at your life and see if this is not the case.
And there it is, the God defender eschews arguments which actually refer to the subject of the thread in favor of simply accusing us all of serving Satan.
I think that wraps up my involvement with this thread. Dpardo, have a wonderful Christmas. And may I say how vastly entertaining it has been to find someone willing to take the "pro" position in a debate on the morality of baby slaughtering.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 3:15 PM dpardo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 3:38 PM Dan Carroll has replied
 Message 142 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 3:39 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 141 of 181 (170876)
12-22-2004 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by Dan Carroll
12-22-2004 3:23 PM


Dan Carroll writes:
And there it is, the God defender eschews arguments which actually refer to the subject of the thread in favor of simply accusing us all of serving Satan.
That is the Bible's claim concerning God.
I think that wraps up my involvement with this thread. Dpardo, have a wonderful Christmas. And may I say how vastly entertaining it has been to find someone willing to take the "pro" position in a debate on the morality of baby slaughtering.
Baby slaughtering. (sigh)
Is that what this whole debate is about?
Typical quote mining. I guess I should have expected as much.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Dan Carroll, posted 12-22-2004 3:23 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Dan Carroll, posted 12-22-2004 3:39 PM dpardo has not replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 142 of 181 (170877)
12-22-2004 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by Dan Carroll
12-22-2004 3:23 PM


Dan Carroll writes:
Dpardo, have a wonderful Christmas.
Thanks Dan.
Merry Christmas to you also.
I actually mean it though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Dan Carroll, posted 12-22-2004 3:23 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 143 of 181 (170878)
12-22-2004 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by dpardo
12-22-2004 3:38 PM


Is that what this whole debate is about?
It's what everybody else has been talking about. Not sure what debate you're having at this point. But have fun with it!
I actually mean it though.
Hey, so do I! I think you're debating a silly position; it doesn't mean I wanna see you crying all alone next to a sparsely decorated stump of a dead tree.
This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 12-22-2004 03:40 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 3:38 PM dpardo has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 144 of 181 (170907)
12-22-2004 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by dpardo
12-22-2004 3:10 PM


dpardo
They were under the direction of their god- Satan.
And of course in the Amelekites view the Israleites were led by satan and thus were guilty by association and as such the Amelikites were properly justified in their attack upon them.
Such is the thought pattern of those who support genocide.The nazis also had such illusions of proper superiority based on "truth" only they were privy to.Upon such arrogance is found the root of the attrocities men commit.
I watched a documentary the other night here concerning a muslim extremist who calimed that the slitting of the throats of people is assured to be painless according to the beliefs he attains to and is thus a "humane"{LOL *puke!*} means of dispatching enemies.
I mentioned this to my fellow workers and we agred that perhaps he should avail himself of the opportunity to test his assertion.It seems so easy for people to shut down their asssumed morals when it comes to those who do not share their view.Such people were mentioned by the WWI poet Wilfred Owen.
Insensibility
I
Happy are men who yet before they are killed
Can let their veins run cold.
Whom no compassion fleers
Or makes their feet
Sore on the alleys cobbled with their brothers.
The front line withers.
But they are troops who fade, not flowers,
For poets' tearful fooling:
Men, gaps for filling:
Losses, who might have fought
Longer; but no one bothers.
II
And some cease feeling
Even themselves or for themselves.
Dullness best solves
The tease and doubt of shelling,
And Chance's strange arithmetic
Comes simpler than the reckoning of their shilling.
They keep no check on armies' decimation.
III
Happy are these who lose imagination:
They have enough to carry with ammunition.
Their spirit drags no pack.
Their old wounds, save with cold, can not more ache.
Having seen all things red,
Their eyes are rid
Of the hurt of the colour of blood for ever.
And terror's first constriction over,
Their hearts remain small-drawn.
Their senses in some scorching cautery of battle
Now long since ironed,
Can laugh among the dying, unconcerned.
IV
Happy the soldier home, with not a notion
How somewhere, every dawn, some men attack,
And many sighs are drained.
Happy the lad whose mind was never trained:
His days are worth forgetting more than not.
He sings along the march
Which we march taciturn, because of dusk,
The long, forlorn, relentless trend
From larger day to huger night.
V
We wise, who with a thought besmirch
Blood over all our soul,
How should we see our task
But through his blunt and lashless eyes?
Alive, he is not vital overmuch;
Dying, not mortal overmuch;
Nor sad, nor proud,
Nor curious at all.
He cannot tell
Old men's placidity from his.
VI
But cursed are dullards whom no cannon stuns,
That they should be as stones.
Wretched are they, and mean
With paucity that never was simplicity.
By choice they made themselves immune
To pity and whatever mourns in man
Before the last sea and the hapless stars;
Whatever mourns when many leave these shores;
Whatever shares
The eternal reciprocity of tears
A merry christmas to you and yours from an atheist who cares if people suffer in their situations in life.May you and the family have a great time and really share your time together fully.Talk at you later.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 3:10 PM dpardo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 4:55 PM sidelined has replied
 Message 146 by Coragyps, posted 12-22-2004 5:06 PM sidelined has not replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 145 of 181 (170912)
12-22-2004 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by sidelined
12-22-2004 4:31 PM


Sidelined writes:
A merry christmas to you and yours from an atheist who cares if people suffer in their situations in life.
Merry Christmas to you also.
I care if people suffer.
God cares if people suffer.
He pronounced rules specifically so that we would not suffer.
It is the violation of these rules that causes suffering.
If you violate these rules, you will suffer and may cause your children to suffer.
Is this not consistent with what you see on earth?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 4:31 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 5:22 PM dpardo has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 761 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 146 of 181 (170914)
12-22-2004 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by sidelined
12-22-2004 4:31 PM


Thanks, Sidelined. I though I knew everything Owen wrote, but you found me another.
I'll go read it again and cry for our sorry-ass species a while.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 4:31 PM sidelined has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 147 of 181 (170917)
12-22-2004 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by dpardo
12-22-2004 4:55 PM


dpado
He pronounced rules specifically so that we would not suffer
Which rules do you suppose those to be and where do you find them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 4:55 PM dpardo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 5:41 PM sidelined has replied
 Message 149 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 5:49 PM sidelined has not replied
 Message 150 by dpardo, posted 12-22-2004 5:54 PM sidelined has not replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 148 of 181 (170926)
12-22-2004 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by sidelined
12-22-2004 5:22 PM


Sidelined writes:
Which rules do you suppose those to be and where do you find them?
The Ten Commandments in Exodus 20.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 5:22 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 6:46 PM dpardo has replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 149 of 181 (170928)
12-22-2004 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by sidelined
12-22-2004 5:22 PM


More:
1 Corinthians 6:9-11:
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 5:22 PM sidelined has not replied

  
dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 150 of 181 (170931)
12-22-2004 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by sidelined
12-22-2004 5:22 PM


More...
Leviticus 18:
1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, I am the LORD your God.
3 After the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.
4 Ye shall do my judgments, and keep mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the LORD your God.
5 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the LORD.
6 None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the LORD.
7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.
10 The nakedness of thy son's daughter, or of thy daughter's daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thine own nakedness.
11 The nakedness of thy father's wife's daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
12 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's sister: she is thy father's near kinswoman.
13 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother's sister: for she is thy mother's near kinswoman.
14 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father's brother, thou shalt not approach to his wife: she is thine aunt.
15 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter in law: she is thy son's wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
16 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife: it is thy brother's nakedness.
17 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.
18 Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life time.
19 Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness.
20 Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour's wife, to defile thyself with her.
21 And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
24 Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:
25 And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
26 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled; )
28 That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
29 For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
30 Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the LORD your God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by sidelined, posted 12-22-2004 5:22 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024