Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are we prisoners of sin
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 232 of 454 (505477)
04-12-2009 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 224 by Peg
04-12-2009 3:13 AM


Re: God's Law(s)
I can assure you that I am informed. I have talked with Mormons on several occasions and they do not use the bible. They use the book of Mormon. I havnt met one yet who carried a bible with them.
I would have to disagree. Mormons very much do use the Christian Bible. In fact I was talking to a LDS coworker just the other day who said that they use the Bible as much if not more in there services than they do there other "God inspired" books i.e. The Book of Mormon, The Peal of Great Price, Doctrine & Covenants etc.
The believe that the Book of Mormon is just an addendum onto the original Christian Bible as shown here:
LDS website writes:
The Bible is a collection of sacred writings containing many of God’s revelations. It is a record of His dealings with some of His children from the Creation through the ministries of Jesus Christ and His Apostles. It was written by prophets and historians who knew God and testified of Jesus Christ. It is read and revered by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and they study it regularly.
The Bible is not God’s final revelation to humanity, however, and neither is this collection of sacred writings complete. The Bible itself speaks of other authoritative books of scripture including books of Nathan the prophet and of Jehu and Enoch, the prophecy of Ahijah, the visions of Iddo the seer, and even missing epistles of Paul (see 2 Chronicles 9:29; 13:22; 20:34; 1 Corinthians 5:9; Jude 1:14). Other books of Latter-day Saint scripturethe Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Priceclarify the gospel as taught in the Bible and corroborate the truthfulness of the Biblical witness of Jesus Christ.
They also believe that the KJV is currently the most accurate translation of the Bible and this is what they use in there church services. Usually Mormons carry both the Bible and the Book of Mormon to church.
Also, the 8th LDS Article of Faith states: "We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly."
Also on the LDS website:
LDS Website writes:
The Bible is the word of God. It is a witness for God and Jesus Christ. Members of the Church are encouraged to study it and follow its teachings. The Church uses many translations of the Bible in various languages. In English, the King James Version is used as the official Bible of the Church.
also
Scriptures, True to the Faith (a Mormon support book published by the LDS church), (2004),155—59 writes:
The official, canonized scriptures of the Church, often called the standard works, are the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price...In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, we revere the Bible and its sacred teachings. We can receive strength and comfort from the biblical accounts of God’s dealings with His people.
BTW, I have personally talked to several Mormon missionaries (I lived in Hawaii for 8 years, which has one of the highest % of LDS besides Utah) and all that I have met had a Bible as well as the BoM on them when the evangelized. Here is their mandate given by a LDS published book stipulating the LDS call to missionary service:
Missionary Work, True to the Faith, (2004),104—6 writes:
Serving Full-Time Missions
After His Resurrection, the Lord commanded His disciples to go and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost (Matthew 28:19). In fulfillment of this command, able young men in the Church have a duty to prepare spiritually, physically, and emotionally to serve as full-time missionaries. Single women and mature couples also have the opportunity to serve full-time missions. If you desire to serve a full-time mission, speak with your bishop or branch president.
Hmm, does this sound vagely familiar to the Christian fundamentalists call to mission work? In fact they are derived from exactly the same source. The Christian Bible.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by Peg, posted 04-12-2009 3:13 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 233 of 454 (505478)
04-12-2009 7:40 AM
Reply to: Message 230 by Peg
04-12-2009 7:10 AM


Re: God's Law(s)
Perhaps you could explain how their beliefs differ from the bible then?
Why are there over 33,000 denominations/sects of Christian belief (as shown here: Status of Global Mission, 2009, in the Context of 20th and 21st Centuries)?
Again, because they intepret the Bible differently than you do.
In addition the LDS have other sources i.e. the Book of Mormon, D&C, The Peal of Great Price and other LDS literature that skews there interpretation of Christianity and the Bible differently than yours.
That's it in a nutshell.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : Correct misspelling

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by Peg, posted 04-12-2009 7:10 AM Peg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 235 by Michamus, posted 04-12-2009 8:10 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 239 of 454 (505485)
04-12-2009 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 237 by Peg
04-12-2009 8:18 AM


Re: God's Law(s)
Peg writes:
I could invent my own book and claim it to be an inspired book and invent a religion and sell it to people too
How do you know this is not similar to how Christianity was invented and evolved? It just has about a 1800 year head start on Mormanism.
Peg writes:
but I would need to prove why my book is inspired.
Wow, really Peg? I have still yet to here an adequate defense for the divine inspiration of the Bible that you claim. Pot calling the kettle, you think?
Peg writes:
How do the Mormons prove this?
The same way many other religious faiths do. Through emotional appeal, skirting around contradictions and deliberate obfuscation (many of the same tactics mainline Christiniaty uses).
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by Peg, posted 04-12-2009 8:18 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by Peg, posted 04-12-2009 10:23 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 252 of 454 (505517)
04-13-2009 5:58 AM
Reply to: Message 248 by Peg
04-12-2009 10:23 PM


Re: God's Law(s)
DevilsAdvocate, i really dont want to debate about other religions.
You are the one who first brought it up in your rebuttal to Legend as shown here: Message 200
Peg writes:
...and Smith's church doest teach the bible, they follow Smith's book
and
Peg writes:
I can assure you that I am informed. I have talked with Mormons on several occasions and they do not use the bible. They use the book of Mormon. I havnt met one yet who carried a bible with them.
If you do not want to debate about it, why did you bring it up in the first place? Sounds like you can't handle constructive critism and can't stand to be wrong. Just admit you were wrong, own up to it and move on. I make mistakes all the time and have several times admited I was wrong even on EvC. If you can prove me wrong, I will concede and move on to something else.
The books of the Christian Greek sciptures are the writings of the Apostles and 1century congregation, so they should be the foundation of Christian belief.
The first part of your assertion is subject to critique (no one is 100% sure the authenticity of all the authors who wrote the books of the NT). This is a subject for another thread.
Peg writes:
As soon as anyone creates their own book, especially one that contradicts the bible, it has to be questioned.
I thought you did not want to debate about 'other' religions?
And how do you know all the books of the Bible belong in the Bible? And what about the inconsistencies and contradictions within the Bible itself? So should you not question all the books from which the Bible itself is composed? Should it not be held to the same standard as you do other religious books i.e. the Book of Mormon?
Joseph Smith was not one of Jesus Apostles.
BTW, neither was Paul considered an Jesus' apostle by Jesus (and no one but himself witnessed his conversion mono e mono by Jesus). Paul/Saul was a self-acclaimed apostle (he called himself the apostle to the gentiles) and many of Jesus apostles/disciples were at first skepticle of his eyewitness story of his conversion.
Peg writes:
He introduced teachings that are contrary to Christian teachings.
So did Paul. The Apostle Peter disputed with Paul several times as describe in his writings i.e. Galations 2:11-14.
He also was the only eyewitness to the appearance of the Angel who apparently showed him a new scroll, afterwhich the Angel took the scroll back to heaven with him. So there were no eye witnesses to the event that he claims to have happened to him.
Same with Paul. There were no eyewitnesses to his conversion by way of vision from Jesus himself (caveat, there were supposedly some servents with him, according to Paul's story, but they did not see the vision from Jesus as described in Acts 9).
Unfortunately, Joseph Smith cannot provide any eye witness testimony to the event he described. Besides that, the teaching of the Mormon church are different to christian teachings and therefore its very hard to consider them to be christian in origin.
Peg, you really do need to conduct some background research before you talk about things you have little knowledge of (just enough to get you in trouble).
However, you are partially wrong (and partially right). Yes, according to his story there were no witnesses during his first few visions with Moronai, however, Joseph Smith did supposedly have "eyewitnnesses" in later visions and showings of the golden plates. First with 3 and then later with 8 witnesses as shown here:
Joseph Smith writes:
Father, mother, you do not know how happy I am; the Lord has now caused the plates to be shown to three more besides myself. They have seen an angel, who has testified to them, and they will have to bear witness to the truth of what I have said, for now they know for themselves that I do not go about to deceive the people, and I feel as if I was relieved of a burden which was almost too heavy for me to bear, and it rejoices my soul that I am not any longer to be entirely alone in the world.
also
Testimony of the Three Witnesses of gold plates
Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this work shall come:
That we, through the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, have seen the plates which contain this record, which is a record of the people of Nephi, and also of the Lamanites, their brethren, and also of the people of Jared, who came from the tower of which hath been spoken. And we also know that they have been translated by the gift and power of God, for his voice hath declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety that the work is true. And we also testify that we have seen the engravings which are upon the plates; and they have been shown unto us by the power of God, and not of man. And we declare with words of soberness, that an angel of God came down from heaven, and he brought and laid before our eyes, that we beheld and saw the plates, and the engravings thereon; and we know that it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, that we beheld and bear record that these things are true. And it is marvelous in our eyes. Nevertheless, the voice of the Lord commanded us that we should bear record of it; wherefore, to be obedient unto the commandments of God, we bear testimony of these things. And we know that if we are faithful in Christ, we shall rid our garments of the blood of all men, and be found spotless before the judgment-seat of Christ, and shall dwell with him eternally in the heavens. And the honor be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God. Amen.
OLIVER COWDERY
DAVID WHITMER
MARTIN HARRIS
Testimony of the Eight Witnesses of the gold plates
Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this work shall come:
That Joseph Smith, Jun., the translator of this work, has shown unto us the plates of which hath been spoken, which have the appearance of gold; and as many of the leaves as the said Smith has translated we did handle with our hands; and we also saw the engravings thereon, all of which has the appearance of ancient work, and of curious workmanship. And this we bear record with words of soberness, that the said Smith has shown unto us, for we have seen and hefted, and know of a surety that the said Smith has got the plates of which we have spoken. And we give our names unto the world, to witness unto the world that which we have seen. And we lie not, God bearing witness of it.
CHRISTIAN WHITMER
JACOB WHITMER
PETER WHITMER, JUN.
JOHN WHITMER
HIRAM PAGE
JOSEPH SMITH, SEN.
HYRUM SMITH
SAMUEL H. SMITH
Too me, this is all religiously fabricated but how much of the Bible do you know is not fabricated? Cas in point, Jim Jones and his following. Why do you think that so many people still believe in miracles and send millions/billions of dollars to the likes of Benny Hinn and the like. Appeal through emotion. If you want something to be true enough it will become true for you, whether it is Christianity, Mormonism or anyother religion out there.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by Peg, posted 04-12-2009 10:23 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Peg, posted 04-13-2009 6:49 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 303 of 454 (505662)
04-14-2009 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 291 by Cedre
04-14-2009 11:20 AM


Re: God's Law(s)
Clearly you fail to understand the nature of God with this statement. God is not a contradiction. When the bible says God is all powerful there are certain limits to his power and one of those limits is, God cannot become evil. Why because God cannot lie and in the bible he is said not to be able to change Mal 3:6 For I, Jehovah, change not; therefore ye, O sons of Jacob, are not consumed.
Oh, so in the following scripture God is really not telling the truth when he says that he will "change his mind" about destroying Judah if they repent?
Jeremiah 18:9-11 NRV writes:
At one moment I may declare concerning a nation or a kingdom, that I will pluck up and break down and destroy it, but if that nation, concerning which I have spoken, turns from its evil, I will change my mind about the disaster that I intended to bring on it. And at another moment I may declare concerning a nation or a kingdom that I will build and plant it, but if it does evil in my sight, not listening to my voice, then I will change my mind about the good that I had intended to do to it.
He cannot change, and seeing that he is a good and loving God, the thought of becoming evil or turning bad doesn't even cross his mind.
Another thing he can't do is create a rock so large that he won't be able to carry it, or make himself not to exist anymore these are things he cannot do.
You know this because??? Just pulling crap out of the Christian apologetic grab bag (aka Josh McDowell's 'Evidence Demands a Verdict' and other religious garbage), huh?
This is all of course assuming the following:
1. God exists. How do we know God exists? Because the Bible says he does. How do we know the Bible is correct? Because the Bible itself says so.
2. God is good. Again this claim is wrapped in circular reasoning because how do we known if God is good? Christians claim God is good because the Bible tells us so. And how do we know the Bible is true and correct? Because God wrote the bible.
3. God is all powerful. Again the only source of this is a 2000+ year old conglomeration of religious writings with non-existent independent evidence backing up any of these claims.
4. The Bible is 100% divinely inspired and inerent. Dito.
5. Nobody who helped write the Bible were soley influenced by the writings of those before them. Rather God dictated to each of them, mono e mono (otherwise where do we draw the line between divinely inspired truth and revisionistic story telling).
That is a big pill of assumptions you are wanting us non-believers to blindly swallow. You might want to stop preaching and start producing some ounce of evidence to back up your claims.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by Cedre, posted 04-14-2009 11:20 AM Cedre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 310 by Peg, posted 04-15-2009 5:44 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 312 of 454 (505676)
04-15-2009 7:37 AM
Reply to: Message 310 by Peg
04-15-2009 5:44 AM


Re: God's Law(s)
Peg writes:
Myself writes:
That is a big pill of assumptions you are wanting us non-believers to blindly swallow. You might want to stop preaching and start producing some ounce of evidence to back up your claims.
perhaps Cedre was thinking that this forum was for discussion on Faith & Belief
So religion requires no evidence to back it up? How do you except people to make informed choices without any semblance of evidence and logic? Is this not the definition of what blind belief/faith is, believing something despite contradictory or lack of evidence? So why provide any evidence at all to back up any of your religious beliefs, if all you need is blind, unquestioning faith that it is correct? Why are you here on this forum trying to defend your religious beliefs if it doesn't need to be defended aka doesn't need evidence to back it up?
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 310 by Peg, posted 04-15-2009 5:44 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 343 of 454 (505896)
04-19-2009 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 342 by purpledawn
04-19-2009 10:34 AM


Re: Contradictions
I feel that Christianity tries to keep its members confused. Just looking at the responses I've gotten here enforces that feeling.
In order for Christianity or for that matter any religion to survive, it (religion) must change symbiotically along with the constantly changing moral framework of human society. If a religion can't keep up with what modern humans determine to be an accurate portrayal of reality and if humans lose faith in it's message of "truth" that religion will eventually die out or be relinquished to the dustbin of religious crackpots and lunatics.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 342 by purpledawn, posted 04-19-2009 10:34 AM purpledawn has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 357 of 454 (505981)
04-21-2009 1:16 AM
Reply to: Message 356 by Peg
04-21-2009 12:56 AM


Re: woodsy
Peg writes:
Cedre that may be true, you may have seen it. But how can you be sure that God is its source? Apostle Paul said that powerful works were going to come to an end
Sick em, Peg! I love a good Bible-thumping contest!
No disrespect Peg. Have a good night

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 356 by Peg, posted 04-21-2009 12:56 AM Peg has not replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 449 of 454 (506927)
04-30-2009 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 447 by Cedre
04-30-2009 11:03 AM


Re: Onifre
Cedre writes:
How I hope you would let yourself experience the same joy that I experience every single day, not like what many people believe Christianity is not a set of laws, Christianity is a freedom from the two greatest chains SIN and DEATH.
Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 447 by Cedre, posted 04-30-2009 11:03 AM Cedre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 451 by dwise1, posted 04-30-2009 12:15 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3121 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 454 of 454 (506975)
04-30-2009 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 451 by dwise1
04-30-2009 12:15 PM


Re: Onifre
Don't you mean: "Been there, done that, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt."?
LOL, yes, exactly. That and a bookshelf of worthless Christian apologetics books!

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 451 by dwise1, posted 04-30-2009 12:15 PM dwise1 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024