This line of reasoning implies that the Bible is internally consistent. If the Bible was written by one person with a single agenda, or proven to be based on one account of factual events then such an assumption might be warranted. Since the Bible is based on multiple allegorical accounts of events of dubious veracity there is cause for serious doubt of that premise.
I realize this, which was why I was asking for a response from PurpleDawn to support his line of reasoning, which obviously assumes the Bible is internally consistent.
The point of my post was to show that it's not.