|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Omniscience, Omnipotence, the Fall & Logical Contradictions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18692 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
you do raise a good point, but its not enough to cause me to doubt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qerX_jD_4n8 Edited by Phat, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9489 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: |
so if everything is preordained, why not choose Jesus?
You are the one that is making the claim not me. Why you asking me?
the other alternative is the false spirit that says it itself is god.
But this would be counter to an omniscient, omnipotent god. and even if you don't believe that, why not choose Jesus anyway?Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 710 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Phat writes:
If there is absolute truth, how can there be free will? A choice between TRUE and FALSE is not a real choice. Free will requires a choice like, If I do this, then that happens OR if I do something else, then something different happens. That's relative truth.
I believe that evil is simple disobedience of truth.... If God was an absolute, however, Lucifer was arguing against that absolute. He was essentially arguing that truth is relative.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18692 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
Phat writes: I believe that evil is simple disobedience of truth.... If God was an absolute, however, Lucifer was arguing against that absolute. He was essentially arguing that truth is relative.Ringo writes: IF my belief is correct, there is not true free will in the sense of having a desired absolute outcome for ones life. "every knee shall bow" one way or another. If we accept Jesus as Gods character...and accept the mans Spirit into a communion with our own....we may then become compelled to start doing more altruistic behaviors. This is why I believe that even though you are not religious and even say that you lean towards agnosticism/atheism, you have the Spirit within you. most all of your answers to many religious arguments and discussions show that you have accepted Jesus, or at least that were you to meet Him you would acknowledge Him as Lord. If there is absolute truth, how can there be free will? A choice between TRUE and FALSE is not a real choice. Free will requires a choice like, If I do this, then that happens OR if I do something else, then something different happens. That's relative truth. You may argue, just for arguments sake, that God foreknew all of this and in that respect you never had a choice not to believe. (or act.) what say ye? Edited by Phat, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SouthDakotaSkeptic Inactive Junior Member |
I just can't see how the existence of evil is compatible with any kind of omnimax god, and I certainly don't see a rational reason why such a god would perform such a charade.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10348 Joined: Member Rating: 6.3 |
Choice has consequences. Is freedom of choice "poison"? Being born has consequences. A child can be born with devastating and utterly painful diseases that kill them before they even reach the age of 5. How did their choices lead to this suffering and evil?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 710 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
There's a big difference between accepting the principles taught by somebody and acknowledging that somebody as "Lord".
This is why I believe that even though you are not religious and even say that you lean towards agnosticism/atheism, you have the Spirit within you. most all of your answers to many religious arguments and discussions show that you have accepted Jesus, or at least that were you to meet Him you would acknowledge Him as Lord. Phat writes:
I think it's pretty clear that the "choice" to be altruistic is biological nad social, not religious. Almost every religion advocates the same altruism.
You may argue, just for arguments sake, that God foreknew all of this and in that respect you never had a choice not to believe. (or act.) what say ye?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18692 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
A popular quote by automaker Henry Ford concerning the Model T in 1909 was this:
quote: Thus my question. Is Red Necessary? Is Green Necessary? Is White Necessary? Edited by Phat, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18692 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
There's a big difference between accepting the principles taught by somebody and acknowledging that somebody as "Lord". Likely the first being in the universe to refuse to call Jesus Lord was satan. Why follow that model?Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 137 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
LOL
Again Phat, that is not what the Bible says.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18692 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
jar writes: I realize that. The argument we all were having was more of a hypothetical dogmatic interpretation and was not intended to be a Bible Study. Logically it would seem that satan was the first character mentioned that did not acknowledge Jesus as Lord. Again Phat, that is not what the Bible says. I realize that your basic argument was that the knowledge of good and evil was a gift that made humans responsible. In our arguments back then, Paul K was claiming that God had to be responsible for allowing evil to exist. I was attempting to introduce my own belief/take that there was potential evil and actual evil. The question was whether Satan ever had a choice to not become evil. Gods foreknowledge would have been irrelevant at this point. Whether God directly caused evil or only created an attractive nuisance is a side issue. Perhaps our question can be summarized thus: Who Was Responsible? Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17994 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: No, it is a central issue. If God knew before creating Satan, that Satan (if he was created as he was) would inevitably rebel then God has the primary responsibility. God chose the rebellion and all its effects and nobody else could possibly stop it. The evil was not just potential - it was guaranteed, and knowingly guaranteed by God's choices.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 137 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
If God is Omniscient and God created all that is, seen and unseen, then God is responsible.
It really is that simple.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18692 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 4.5 |
PaulK writes: OK, I'll follow your argument for a moment. God has the primary responsibility. The Buck Stops There. So what does that mean for an individual? Can the individual be blamed for denying God? Being angry at God? Ignoring belief altogether? Or is the individual still responsible for their own behavior regardless where the behavior originated from? If God knew before creating Satan, that Satan (if he was created as he was) would inevitably rebel then God has the primary responsibility. God chose the rebellion and all its effects and nobody else could possibly stop it. The evil was not just potential - it was guaranteed, and knowingly guaranteed by God's choices.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. —RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." —Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith Paul was probably SO soaked in prayer nobody else has ever equaled him.~Faith
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17994 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
quote: Obviously if all that was decided in advance by God - before the individual even existed - it would be nuts for God to hold them responsible for any of it. As for us, can we really condemn someone for being unable to defy God’s will ?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025