Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bob Cornuke and Noah's Ark in Iran?
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 760 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 10 of 56 (323430)
06-19-2006 5:55 PM


Even more intriguing, some of the wood-like rocks were tested just this week and actually proved to be petrified wood....
And how does one test for petrified wood? My guess would have been by looking at it with an experienced eye to see if it had any of the morphological characters of known petrified wood: mineralogy would tell you almost nothing, I would think. (Unless it's basalt - I'd like to see a mechanism for replacement of wood by basalt. Or granite.) I realize this is apologetics/journalism we're getting, but I'd really like to know what tests they ran.....

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 760 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 51 of 56 (329412)
07-06-2006 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by randman
07-06-2006 2:03 PM


Re: so we have a shipwreck resting at 13,000 feet?
Thus far, all the facts indicate that there is a positive test for petrified wood.
I'm calling bullshit. What would such a test consist of? Microscopic examination I might buy, but chemical tests are a bit chancy. Was there something here about organic vs. inorganic carbon content? Shale sometimes has a large organic carbon component. If these folks have any "facts," why won't they say what those facts are?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 2:03 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024