quote:
Electrons have never been observed, either. Does this mean that they do not exist?
Objection noted...
What do you think?
And why is it that there is no ToE (theory of electrons)?
Because.......
Unlike evolution, we can demonstrate the properties of electrons in real time. The fact that we can predict the future behavior manifested by electrons on a rather consistent basis may have even contributed to the developement of the electron microscope (ya think?), which of course, like all other advancements in science, evolution had nothing to do with at all.
Same thing with nuclear physics. Unlike evolution, we can demonstrate and predict (in real time) the behavior manifested by atoms under certain conditions. Perhaps you've heard of the superconducter? And surely Hiroshima and Nagasaki haven't been forgotten?
So, to put ToE on par with the electronic microscope, the superconducter, and the atom bomb is quite the
non-sequitur, non?
Unless the point was to prove the irrelevancy of ToE to real science...
In summary, then, things like gravity, electrons, and the properties of atoms can be demonstrated in real time WHEREAS ToE cannot.
Turn a fruitfly into a bee or grasshopper and ToE may be able to place itself on par with the other discoveries of science able to be demonstrated and observed in real time.