Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,758 Year: 4,015/9,624 Month: 886/974 Week: 213/286 Day: 20/109 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christmas Star Explained
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 196 of 278 (429759)
10-21-2007 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by Vacate
10-21-2007 7:25 AM


Re: Shekiniah Glory Starship Sceptre!
So the Heaven that people could stroll into was relocated in the days of Peleg. Excellent.
So how do you explain your previous post:
Actually, the universe state was changed, affecting where the spiritual areas could now be. More to do with fabric of the temporary universe, than moving things spiritual.
What is this place? This is obviously not the Heaven from the time of Babel, so is this another Heaven that Jesus ascended to after his death? Is it still there? When did it become non-physical? This place you spoke of was in reply to Bernerbits who was quite clear about the physical nature of this location:
New Jerusalem is the place Jesus built, and prepared after He left earth. It has precise measurements, and materials. New Jerusalem was not physical. It is not now, and won't be. It will come to earth in a little over 1000 years and land here. At that time, the universe will no longer be in the state it is now, only physical, but will be both, spiritual and physical, together, eternal.
This is the "abode" that I am curious about. This one that Jesus ascended to after "taking great lengths to prove he was still human". This place was obviously not removed/altered/transported during the time of Peleg. Sorry for the drawn out confusion, the time of Peleg Heaven nicely clears up the question of why God didn't want a tower built though.
Where Jesus ascended to was not in the realm of men. It is a separate place now, no longer nearby, and almost accessible. From there, He prepared a place for us believers, a special place. So special, God lives there, and angels as well as us.
I now am forced to ask you... How high up was the other Heaven that Jesus ascended to? Is this still around? Is it still physical?
Already covered that. It is spiritual, and not near the reach and realm of man.
I was not asking if you where kidding about the substance of my post. I was asking if you where kidding because you asked me to answer my own bloody questions!
Didn't I ask you to state your position on the topic, precisely?? How could that be unreasonable??
If I write a book and you think its illogical, would it then make sense for me to require you to clarify how you would write the story? What does my opinion matter when its your story thats under discussion? What I think is the case is you are hoping that I will say the Bible is a story, you can then call me an athiest, and then pat yourself on the back for exposing another demon. I am not saying the bible is a story, I am saying you are inventing a story and using the bible as a reference.
It matters, because it is likely so unsupportable, as to weigh in as a joke. I like things that are funny. I also think that you have no logical case presented, so no basis to call anything illogical. Why are afraid to answer simple questions, like what do you think the Christmas star was? Are you that ashamed of your position, it can't see the light of day??
He set it up and then knocked it down. Works for me, but it casts a negative light on your high flyin, scepter god.
No idea what you are talking about there. God knocked down what??
So it was not physical, but it could be built up to and entered? I still have issues with your descriptions.
At the time of Babel, the universe was not in this state, so we have nothing to compare it to. Once a man got beyond the curded ground, and surface, we had been limited to, maybe entering the spiritual level would have been entering the eternal state, somehow. In our sinful condition, that was not an option. The messiah had to come, and affect the change in man from the inside first. [qs] It has not stopped you from posting about these topics until I ask you to be specific. How should I interpret this?[qs] At face value. Besides I already covered all the questions.
I said it many times, it was above the location of Heaven. Work on your memory, make flash cards, sticky notes, something that will progress this discussion so I don't have to keep repeating this.
But the 'heaven' of Babel was long gone. Write that down, it is a crucial point.
I don't believe your story, as I said above. Its not nessesary to divulge this because I think its quite obvious. As for my opinion on the Bible - its not relevant to the discussion, nor is the size of my shoe.
If you thought there was none, you would need reasons. If you thought it was astronomical, you would need support.
Have you any reason to think that the sapphire throne starship star coes not fit the bill for the evidences, and bible we have??

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by Vacate, posted 10-21-2007 7:25 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Vacate, posted 10-21-2007 7:57 PM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 197 of 278 (429766)
10-21-2007 5:32 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by ringo
10-21-2007 11:00 AM


One should be incredulous to baseless speculation with no substance, as your fantasy that the king must have heard it, when a peasant passed gas.
The Chief was right there, making sure that the king was on a need to know basis, till His agents presented the news. That is clear.
I see no reason why the talk of shepherds had to reach the king at all. There was a lot of talk a lot of the time, by a lot of important people.
The bible timeline has certain things having been done, and in a narrow margin of time. You don't want to work with that. Instead you fantasize that the Almighty was MIA, and unable to handle the security, and news dissemination concerning the biggest event in history, that calenders are still set to. You seem to seek a natural explanation for the star, despite it's unnatural nature!
Yes, the shepherds told the good news of what the angels told them, but there in no reason to claim it made it to Herod at all. There is absolute reason to know it did not, the bible documents Herod as being totally ignorant. Just the way you would think the Almighty would have kept the evil child killer.
If that is the imaginary main Planck of your case, then you have no case.
There is a real time line boundary to work in here, and real events that must fit in it. There are several known quantities, and the end result is that a flying mobile throne of God in the night sky best fits the facts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by ringo, posted 10-21-2007 11:00 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by ringo, posted 10-21-2007 5:43 PM simple has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 198 of 278 (429769)
10-21-2007 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by simple
10-21-2007 5:32 PM


simple writes:
I see no reason why the talk of shepherds had to reach the king at all.
It doesn't matter whether or not you see reason. I laid out a plausible scenario - as opposed to your implausible scenario - for the people who do see reason.
You seem to seek a natural explanation for the star, despite it's unnatural nature!
Of course. We always seek out a natural (plausible) explanation before we resort to a supernatural (implausible) explanation.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by simple, posted 10-21-2007 5:32 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by simple, posted 10-21-2007 6:10 PM ringo has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 199 of 278 (429780)
10-21-2007 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by ringo
10-21-2007 5:43 PM


Mental Conjuring Exposed
It doesn't matter whether or not you see reason. I laid out a plausible scenario - as opposed to your implausible scenario - for the people who do see reason.
It doesn't matter that you think it is plausible. It goes against the bible time line, and spirit of what was going on, and bald bible facts, like Herod knew squat at the news conference of the Magi.
Why seek out to interpret the bible selectively, and in such a way as to leave God out of the picture, the rest of the bible out of the picture, and proceed to dreaming stuff up??
Of course. We always seek out a natural (plausible) explanation before we resort to a supernatural (implausible) explanation.
No, we do not, when it comes to things spiritual. Some do, some don't. Those that do, end up in a dead end, making stuff up. Those that don't click in to the universal mysteries of the eternal spiritual which was real and present at the birth of the son of God. Without that spiritual, you can't begin to grasp the even modestly deep things of the spirit.
You have made up what you feel is a plausible scenario, and I might ask you something. Is there a real messiah in that scenario, or a real Father, or any reality to the other parts of the new testament, where the time frame is given?? Was there any real star at all in your mental conjuring??
What do you claim it was, or was not??? Obviously you can't assail my bible based claims, that meet all scientific evidences we do have.
-What's left, but to look at your alternative?? Show us what you got.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by ringo, posted 10-21-2007 5:43 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by ringo, posted 10-21-2007 6:55 PM simple has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 200 of 278 (429790)
10-21-2007 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by simple
10-21-2007 6:10 PM


Re: Mental Conjuring Exposed
simple writes:
Is there a real messiah in that scenario, or a real Father, or any reality to the other parts of the new testament, where the time frame is given??
Of course. Everything I have posted in this thread is based on the assumption that there is a real God and that Jesus was the real Messiah. Everything I have posted is based on what the gospel accounts actually say.
Was there any real star at all in your mental conjuring??
Of course. Everything I have posted in this thread is based on the assumption that there were real wise men who saw something real in the sky. Everything I have posted is based on what the gospel accounts actually say.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by simple, posted 10-21-2007 6:10 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 2:36 AM ringo has replied

  
Vacate
Member (Idle past 4626 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 10-01-2006


Message 201 of 278 (429799)
10-21-2007 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by simple
10-21-2007 5:02 PM


Re: Shekiniah Glory Starship Sceptre!
Actually, the universe state was changed, affecting where the spiritual areas could now be. More to do with fabric of the temporary universe, than moving things spiritual.
So they couldn't walk into heaven now? Your position changes so fast I can't keep track of it.
New Jerusalem is the place Jesus built, and prepared after He left earth.
Thanks for not answering the question. Had I asked about New Jerusalem I would have said "what is New Jerusalem?" and not "so is this another Heaven that Jesus ascended to after his death?"
Already covered that. It is spiritual, and not near the reach and realm of man.
No you didn't, you rambled on about New Jerusalem when I was clear about what Heaven I was talking about for that period of time. And you don't make sense anyways - try to clear up my specific question about why its not physical even though Jesus went to lengths to show he was still human.
Didn't I ask you to state your position on the topic, precisely?? How could that be unreasonable??
No you didn't you asked me to answer my own questions. Look back in the thread. If that's not what you wished to convey then quote the appropriate portions next time. Your confusing enough without me guessing what sections of my post you actually meant to quote.
It matters, because it is likely so unsupportable, as to weigh in as a joke.
I believe it was a small cloud of bluish purple frogs with vampire teeth and a long fuzzy tail. They plan to rule the world by slowly taking over high ranking positions in government, and they eat babies. (hence their proximity to the newborn Jesus)
There! Now that that is out of the way can we carry on with your version of the story?
No idea what you are talking about there. God knocked down what??
You where talking about the tower of Babel, I made a fast summary so I can stop repeating the same crap again and again. I see that you are unable to keep up with even that much so I will continue to repeat the same stuff over and over so you can remember what you have posted and how I am replying.
At the time of Babel, the universe was not in this state, so we have nothing to compare it to.
I really don't care, unless your story is going to progress to a point where you say if that version was or was not physical in such a way that the tower could have been a successful project. You could live by your name for once and answer me simple. This is what I meant by never being clear so you can switch sides of the fence any time you want.
But the 'heaven' of Babel was long gone. Write that down, it is a crucial point.
No need to write it down, my memory is fine. Especially given that I have to repeat so often for you to keep up with your own story. Its quite obvious that I was aware of the Babel heaven being long gone as its part of my post that you are replying too. The problem is that you never answer any question that provides a concise answer that you don't appear to contradict sometimes within the same reply. Clarity is key here, make some attempt so this discussion can quit eating its own head.
If you thought there was none, you would need reasons. If you thought it was astronomical, you would need support.
Have you any reason to think that the sapphire throne starship star coes not fit the bill for the evidences, and bible we have??
So you are saying that for me to question your story I must have one of my own. You have a weird outlook on things, but your in luck - refer to my frog story from this point on. I have no support, in case you are wondering. Nothing. (Rainy Season by Stephen King is the basis for my inspiration however)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by simple, posted 10-21-2007 5:02 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 2:53 AM Vacate has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1369 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 202 of 278 (429845)
10-22-2007 12:55 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by simple
10-18-2007 12:45 AM


Re: One ting leads to another
Actually, it is somewhat unknown, some even thought they were kings.
some thought wrong.
They well may have had a fairly well rounded knowledge of more than just stars.
indeed. magic, too.
i don't know why you think that "sceptre" means UFO. you don't want to listen to reason. you don't want to look up words in the dictionary. you don't want to read the bible. you just go on talking the same old nonsense, as if it's so natural that the rest of world would share your misunderstandings and delusions.
I already covered that. I said I thought it referred to God, and His rule, including kings of Israel. But, since we know He has wheels, the starship is part of that.
like i said, you just go right on making stuff up. first, it doesn't apply to god in that verse. it applies to judah. it's HIS rule jacob is talking about. second, not every shiny object is the same thing.
First of all, who said that a son of David needed to be on a throne somewhere??? Can you show us the exact basis of that claim?
yes. it's in god's prophecy to david, upon his coronation:
quote:
2Sa 7:16 And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.
remember now, this is god talking to david. not vice versa. it's david's kingdom, and david's throne, granted to him by god. or does david have a spaceship too?
All I say, is that the Father would still rule Israel as His people, till Jesus came.
that's not what the verse says. the verse says judah would rule until the end of time.
the wonderful thing about ignorance, you see, is that you don't know that you don't know something.
I would recommend that if you don't know something, like whether the ark was hid, or whatever, that you simply admit that ignorance, rather than glorying in it.
no, simple, i was talking about your ignorance. you should feel free to admit when you don't know something. which is apparently quite frequently, seeing has 99% of your postings are simply made up nonsense.
Simple solution there, just reference what you are talking about and be clear. Otherwise the first ting gets confused for the second ting, and the two tings don't know what end is up. Work on that.
simple, i was discussing the OP. if you don't like people being on topic that's your issue.
Cute, so now you claim that these good and wise men listened to the madman's henchmen!?? Prove it. Seems to me they were humoring the palace demons there, till they could flee for their lives!
the text does not say where they went.
except that they evidently did not preemptively believe in future-jesus. seriously, what need does your immortal soul have an in spiritual saviour when god himself is physically among you, on your side, and kicking ass left and right while leading you through the desert? that's more than a little silly -- god's literally on their side, but their souls need saving from... god's wrath?
He was not physically there. He is not physical. He was present, yes, but is present today as well, inside our hearts. He still kicks it for us, and soon will really cut loose, and it'll be like old times.
god wasn't physically there? have you READ exodus? seriously. pillar of fire by day, pillar of smoke at night. leading the way through the desert.
the problem here is that you're reading the bible backwards. you can't say that people who were "divinely inspired" by god to create these definitions were wrong, because the person you believe fits the bill, doesn't. you're comparing what, exactly? prophecy, with the people who quoted the prophecy?
Not sure what you are talking about here, was it the first ting, or the second ting?? If you mean the old temples, no, I mean the new temples, the third ting. Get it??
you were basically saying that "you can't trust jews" to get the description of the messiah right. nevermind that it's their religion and their definitions. again, you are literally speaking ill of the people who wrote the bible, saying their books are lies. do you not see the issue with this?
I mean the Pharisees and scribes, and rulers in Jesus day. Ezzie does not say either way anything significant about the presence or location, or absence of the ark. Does he??? So, he is neither here nor there on it.
no. his silence speaks volumnes. look. let's say, hypothetically, that some great work of art is missing, say the mona lisa. if you were in charge of the louvre's inventory after ww2, and you failed to mention the mona lisa, and when we go check the museum now, it's not there -- did it disappear last thursday, or after ww2?
Can you show us exactly where in it's pages it should be??? What chapter??
it should be in 2 kings 25 if it was in the first temple before the babylonians came. it should be ezra 1 if it was in the second temple.
I would even consider the poor guy may not have known at the time. If the ark was taken from the holy of Holy by God at the death of Jesus, why not have it put there after the temple was set up, in the second temple.
what? this is 500 and 600 years before christ. it's NOT in the second temple when ezra has it rebuilt under cyrus. it's NOT in the second temple when babylon invades and takes everything else. the altar is also missing.
Remember, no need for the first ting to be the same as the second ting.
you mean thing? you keeping using "ting." why? it's gotta be on purpose. you're not even making sense, either way.
Just because they carried it, or whatnot into the first, doesn't mean circumstances were the same in the second instance. Does it?? God works in mysterious ways.
....uh, no. it didn't get around by levitation. people carried it. on specially designed holy sticks made of shittim wood, covered in gold. inserted through four rings, one each corner. it didn't teleport. and even if it did, that's be a pretty cool miracle to write about. look, it's presence alone is enough to write about. miracles are even more worthy of writing. nothing was said about it? it wasn't there.
In the first ark, of Noah, He closed the door Himself. That could be precedent. All tings considered.
*headdesk*
do you really not understand how noah's ark -- a boat -- is a completely different thing than the ark of the covenant -- a box covered in gold and topped by two cherubim, designed to carry the ten commandments, and a few other relic?
go back to sunday school.
Not unless they were allowed. From the bible it seems they neither took it, or returned it.
then it was destroyed when the temple was burned to the ground. remember, first and second temples -- there was a period in between when there was nothing there because the first temple was destroyed. the second temple had to be BUILT. it's not just a fruity naming system. there really were two physical temples. now, if you wanna talk simple remodelling, herod the great (you know, that madman from above) remodelled the second temple quite extravagently. it was still called "the second temple."


This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by simple, posted 10-18-2007 12:45 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 4:18 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1369 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 203 of 278 (429846)
10-22-2007 1:06 AM
Reply to: Message 149 by simple
10-18-2007 1:14 AM


herod the great reportedly killed two children he saw as a threat to his throne. it's NOT out of the question, because apparently it happened.
and yes, herod did die very soon after that incident.
That has what to do with your claim he would get fired??
*sigh* not fired. killed. do you really not understand how being a king worked? you don't fire a king. you depose them. violently. a new king in israel, that wasn't herod's son, meant revolution, rebellion, and a violent coup.
no, not "astronomical." "astrological." they had gathered information from the star. you can't do that from a UFO sighting. and so what if it led them to the house? as i pointed out, stars move. what's more, they move from east to west.
You now claim that they never saw the star, and followed it to Israel. Ok. Thin ice indeed, there. In fact.
what? how did you get that from what i said? no, they saw a star, not a ufo. they gathered information from the star -- something routine in astrology, but that a UFO cannot do.
I said I called His ship that name. And it is fitting, since it is His rule, His sceptre that the star prophesy speaks of. The ship is like something that carries out the royal will, gets the job done, on the scene, Hands on, involved, execution of royal decrees. I can see why the name got to mean what it did, something we could wrap our little heads around.
do you just live in your own little world or something? you've got a very vivid imagination. here's this object, a chariot, that appears once in a vision in the bible, and you're reading it all over the place, arbitrarily calling it certain names, and then interpretting anything with a similar name to be it. how ludicrous can you be?
Are you suggesting that the star could not have been seen by the 'king' of the east?? First of all, if it did come down to rest over Israel at the time of the birth of the Messiah, one might presume it came from real high! That means that the kings could have seen it, even heading for a ceratin area, and get real excited! Sorry, it was called a star for a reason. They can be see quite a ways off, you know.
no. you missed the point. the point is that a bunch of astrologers saw it from 1,000 miles away, but the people right under it simply hadn't noticed. that points to a star (you know, like it says in the bible) and not a UFO.
Jack didn't really seem fitting, besides it seems like you don't seem to know Jack, sometimes.
no, simple. i know a lot more about this subject than you do. not just the bible, but UFOs too. you don't know jack, but you keep coming in here with your ridiculous intepretations that plainly defy any rational reading of the text. you're making shit up, proof positive of someone who doesn't know jack.
Star meant light in the sly, more or less. And it was not followed by stargazers, only those gazers that it wanted to guide. Are you claiming the wise men were the only gazers!!??? Ridiculous.
considering that astrology was punishable by death in israel, yes. only astrologers from a foreign country would have noticed. and only astrologers from persia would have cared. why persia? read the book of esther -- persia had an israelite queen. the two nations were on good terms.
Ah, some progress here! Now then, are you suggesting that His 'chatiot' could not travel in space?? What, the wheels of the Almighty creator of all universe, had to spin His wheels only in earth's atmosphere!!!!!!!????? Think about it.
i'm suggesting that ezekiel's vision was not of a klingon bird of prey. it was a vision, laden with symbolic meanings and not reality. do you understand the difference?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by simple, posted 10-18-2007 1:14 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 4:53 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 204 of 278 (429853)
10-22-2007 2:36 AM
Reply to: Message 200 by ringo
10-21-2007 6:55 PM


Inexpressible Brilliance
Of course. Everything I have posted in this thread is based on the assumption that there is a real God and that Jesus was the real Messiah. Everything I have posted is based on what the gospel accounts actually say.
Great, so you believe in Jesus, and the real Christmas star. How did a star guide men to a house???
Or do you actually mean "as if" the bible were true, though you think something else?
I can't see how anyone that believes the bible could question the idea that Jesus was no longer a baby by the time the wise men got there.
Here is some supposed observations from someone that lived close to that time.
"Upon seeing a star rising in the East (the Star of Bethlehem), they realized it was a sign that the king of the Jews had been born. According to St. Ignatius of Antioch (d. AD 107), the star shone with an inexpressible brilliance, and the sun, moon, and other stars all formed a chorus around the special star (Letter to the Ephesians, 19). The wise men followed the star to Bethlehem of Judea, and to Jesus' dwelling there. Having arrived, they worshipped the infant Jesus, and gave him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh."
Welcome churchyear.net - BlueHost.com
Doesn't sound like a regular star at all. It really is impossible for a star up there to guide us to a house. Admit it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by ringo, posted 10-21-2007 6:55 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by ringo, posted 10-22-2007 10:29 AM simple has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3451 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 205 of 278 (429854)
10-22-2007 2:38 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by simple
10-20-2007 11:43 PM


Re: Stairway to Heaven
The Christmas star?? What, you think there really was a Christmas star of any kind??? Show us what it was, and we may see how superior your ideas are here, and how good a grip you have.
Wow...just wow.
I think I've done a pretty good job of following the "simple" logic displayed on this thread so far, but this is too much.
Denying the object of the whole thread (you did say "of any kind") just to continue on with your own tortured thought processes is just way beyond the pale.
I am all for psychotropic drugs when used responsibly, but, seriously, when you can't even follow your own ideas (much less expect anyone else to...props to Ringo and Vacate btw) it may just be the time to come down and join the real world again.
Thousands of years earlier in a different universe. So?? How does that relate to the times of Christ???
Because YOU said that heaven was only 2-3000 feet above ground (in a physically attainable state for the builders of the tower) and that heaven was only moved by Jesus AFTER he was risen (and was then, and only then, on a spiritual plane).
Hey, despite your hocus pocus, I am right in focus. The tower of Babel was in a different state universe, and thousands of years before this! You would need to connect the dots to have a point. Points are good. Work on that.
A different state universe? How does that affect units of measurements? Care to explain?
YOU said that heaven was at a certain height (2-3000 feet above the ground). YOU also said that Heaven was "moved" by Jesus when he was risen (which would be "thousands of years" after Babel). Now YOU have to explain how GOD IN HIS "SAPPHIRE UFO/THRONE" WAS VISIBLE AS A "STAR" TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FEET IN THE AIR (and invisible to everyone but the wise men...) BUT, HEAVEN, WHICH IS JUST 2-3000 FEET IN THE AIR, REMAINS INVISIBLE UNTIL JESUS DECIDES TO MOVE IT!
Oh and you proposed that some of the wise men came from Message 160India and China but then claimed that the "STAR" was only high enough to be locally seen. How would anyone from India or China see a local (roundabout Israel) "star-sceptre" event?
quote:
Besides, if I waved a magic wand over a star, and had it dance around, leading wise men to a street address, the world would know it. It would be recorded in ancient records. It wasn't. Therefore a localized event, and light in the sky best explains it
...you might wanna try to keep up with your own arguments
BTW - I am not shouting..just making sure you see the words and (hopefully) comprehend them.
Now, about your claim that the location of heaven changed..can you back it up?? See, I never really got into that aspect much, so 99% of your ideas seem to be gross misconceptions here.
Um...YOU claimed that the location of heaven changed in order to gain credibility for your Babel argument. Can you back it up?
There was, for example, a paradise below the earth, in my opinion. How else could Jesus go to paradise after He died??? He never rose to the heavens till afterwards
Care to back that up? And why in the world would the people in the story of Babel try to build a tower UP to heaven if heaven was BELOW THE EARTH? Are Paradise and Heaven two different places?? What is the difference between the two?
Whatever they may think, if they have the comprehension to read what I say, they would not suppose that the tower of Babel spiritual level was here in Jesus' day.
Like it was pointed out to you many times before, if heaven was purely a spiritual place then there would have been no threat posed by a physical tower built by humans. If the story was a spiritual allegory, another problem remains...namely, why would God deliberately stop in its tracks a communal effort among humans to build a "tower" to the divine realm of heaven which would provide them with peace and harmony. Why wouldn't God reward such a "Christian" concept?
Because he had a plan for his "son/himself?" He couldn't dare to part with his narcissistic plan to sacrifice himself (after riding in his spaceship for show) to help the people he created get over themselves and bow down to his superiority?
Instead God caused confusion and discord...WHY? So it would make his ultimate plan for "Peace" that much harder?? So it would be that much harder for the message of Jesus to carry to all the nations?? Maybe it's just me and my puny human mind, but "unconditional love" does not require tests or convoluted games. If it was "all part of the Plan" it seems like a confused, sadistic mess, to me.
So, have you any point left, that was not just demolished, on how the starship would have some problem with a spiritual level that disappeared millennia before do let us know.
Maybe you should let yourself know, because it was YOUR idea in the first damn place (minus the "spiritual level" because you suggested that Heaven was PHYSICALLY attainable with the Tower of Babel).

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by simple, posted 10-20-2007 11:43 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 3:45 AM Jaderis has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 206 of 278 (429855)
10-22-2007 2:53 AM
Reply to: Message 201 by Vacate
10-21-2007 7:57 PM


Re: Shekiniah Glory Starship Sceptre!
So they couldn't walk into heaven now? Your position changes so fast I can't keep track of it.
4400 years ago is not something I have changed in years as a timing point. Must be your attention, and comprehension shortfall there.
Thanks for not answering the question. Had I asked about New Jerusalem I would have said "what is New Jerusalem?" and not "so is this another Heaven that Jesus ascended to after his death?"
You are welcome. Of course He did not ascend to New Jerusalem, if He prepared the city for us. Although I suppose it might be possible for someone to argue prepared does not mean create, just fix up!!?
No you didn't, you rambled on about New Jerusalem when I was clear about what Heaven I was talking about for that period of time. And you don't make sense anyways - try to clear up my specific question about why its not physical even though Jesus went to lengths to show he was still human.
You may not be as clear as you think you are. Jesus was physical and spiritual, or merged, which is the eternal state. It has qualities of both! That is how we will be as well. Heaven, or New Jerusalem also will be like that. Whether it become like that at the new universe state, or is now, I don't know. But it will be like that when it comes to earth. I picture it as being spiritual only right now, but don't really know.
No you didn't you asked me to answer my own questions. Look back in the thread. If that's not what you wished to convey then quote the appropriate portions next time. Your confusing enough without me guessing what sections of my post you actually meant to quote.
Then consider them asked now. What is your take on the bible, God, and the Christmas star??
I believe it was a small cloud of bluish purple frogs with vampire teeth and a long fuzzy tail. They plan to rule the world by slowly taking over high ranking positions in government, and they eat babies. (hence their proximity to the newborn Jesus)
There! Now that that is out of the way can we carry on with your version of the story?
I think there was a starship. I know you have no science or evidence otherwise. Game over.
I really don't care, unless your story is going to progress to a point where you say if that version was or was not physical in such a way that the tower could have been a successful project. You could live by your name for once and answer me simple. This is what I meant by never being clear so you can switch sides of the fence any time you want.
Nonsense. The tower may have allowed them to live forever, upon reaching the spiritual level. Why else would they be so gung ho to do it??
No need to write it down, my memory is fine. Especially given that I have to repeat so often for you to keep up with your own story. Its quite obvious that I was aware of the Babel heaven being long gone as its part of my post that you are replying too. The problem is that you never answer any question that provides a concise answer that you don't appear to contradict sometimes within the same reply. Clarity is key here, make some attempt so this discussion can quit eating its own head.
Nothing contradictory about a spiritual level at the time of Babel. Nothing unclear about that level having gone at the universe change. The spinning of wheels only exists in your head. Work on that.
So you are saying that for me to question your story I must have one of my own. You have a weird outlook on things, but your in luck - refer to my frog story from this point on. I have no support, in case you are wondering. Nothing. (Rainy Season by Stephen King is the basis for my inspiration however)
So you offer that as your case. OK. Noted.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by Vacate, posted 10-21-2007 7:57 PM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by Jaderis, posted 10-22-2007 3:36 AM simple has replied
 Message 214 by Vacate, posted 10-22-2007 10:49 AM simple has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3451 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 207 of 278 (429858)
10-22-2007 3:36 AM
Reply to: Message 206 by simple
10-22-2007 2:53 AM


Re: Shekiniah Glory Starship Sceptre!
You are welcome. Of course He did not ascend to New Jerusalem, if He prepared the city for us. Although I suppose it might be possible for someone to argue prepared does not mean create, just fix up!!?
So the "new heaven" that is different from the old heaven from the Babel story is not quite ready yet? It is just being "prepared?"
How does that help your previous claims? Not at all, I imagine.
You may not be as clear as you think you are. Jesus was physical and spiritual, or merged, which is the eternal state. It has qualities of both! That is how we will be as well. Heaven, or New Jerusalem also will be like that. Whether it become like that at the new universe state, or is now, I don't know. But it will be like that when it comes to earth. I picture it as being spiritual only right now, but don't really know.
But you KNOW that the heaven of Babel was SOOOOO close and PHYSICAL and GOD took it away (how soon after the flood?? and why??) and you KNOW that Jesus moved heaven (into a previously unknown spiritual realm?). Where was heaven and what was heaven in between? Do you have any scriptual support for any of your answers?
P.S. I think "don't really know" comes from not having answers from your pet website. Read the fucking bible. Read the fucking bible. In context and then read this thread again and research and then read the fucking bible again and rinse and repeat.
Your answers might still be there. Who knows?
Believing in our own ability to be Mulder can cloud our ability to think beyond Mulder.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 2:53 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by simple, posted 10-22-2007 5:08 AM Jaderis has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 208 of 278 (429860)
10-22-2007 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 205 by Jaderis
10-22-2007 2:38 AM


Re: Stairway to Heaven
Wow...just wow.
I think I've done a pretty good job of following the "simple" logic displayed on this thread so far, but this is too much.
Denying the object of the whole thread (you did say "of any kind") just to continue on with your own tortured thought processes is just way beyond the pale.
I am all for psychotropic drugs when used responsibly, but, seriously, when you can't even follow your own ideas (much less expect anyone else to...props to Ringo and Vacate btw) it may just be the time to come down and join the real world again.
Asking for one's opinion on what they are debating is not related to drugs, sorry that seems a bit foreign yo you in your present frame of mind. If one tells me that ship does not fit the bill, I have every right to ask what they think would, if anything. Focus.
Because YOU said that heaven was only 2-3000 feet above ground (in a physically attainable state for the builders of the tower) and that heaven was only moved by Jesus AFTER he was risen (and was then, and only then, on a spiritual plane).
No, that is madness. First, I guessed at how high the spiritual level might have been, that men could build a tower to it. Maybe they were better builders, and it could have been higher.
Next, in no way did I ever for an instant dream that there was such a spiritual level at the time of Christ. Someone got a real wong number there, and some serious wires crossed. I clearly say that the universe is not the same state after Babel, and there is no longer any such level. Pay attention, before talking.
A different state universe? How does that affect units of measurements? Care to explain?
Sure. What measurements do you mean?? Spiritual ones?? Physical ones??? Do tell.
YOU said that heaven was at a certain height (2-3000 feet above the ground). YOU also said that Heaven was "moved" by Jesus when he was risen (which would be "thousands of years" after Babel).
No. False. You might be thinking about how there was a 'paradise under the earth??? If so, that never needed to be moved. Just the inhabitants there! Jesus went up, to a spiritual heaven somewhere. Then, He prepared a place for Christians, that is New Jerusalem, that is what most refer to as 'heaven'. It is the place God lives, and we will live forever. Don't blame me for your own misconceptions.
Now YOU have to explain how GOD IN HIS "SAPPHIRE UFO/THRONE" WAS VISIBLE AS A "STAR" TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FEET IN THE AIR (and invisible to everyone but the wise men...) BUT, HEAVEN, WHICH IS JUST 2-3000 FEET IN THE AIR, REMAINS INVISIBLE UNTIL JESUS DECIDES TO MOVE IT!
Ha. A complete misunderstanding, ridiculous. There was NO heaven thousands of feet, or thousands of miles up when Jesus rose. The realities of the Babel state were long gone. Period. Don't repeat this nonsense again.
Oh and you proposed that some of the wise men came from Message 160India and China but then claimed that the "STAR" was only high enough to be locally seen. How would anyone from India or China see a local (roundabout Israel) "star-sceptre" event?
I PROPOSED that maybe they, for example could have come from those places. Focus. IF they did, the idea I proposed was that the starship came down to Israel at the time of Jesus' birth. It came to hover over Israel at a height that was NOT visible in far away countries. That is wjhy no records exist in history. BUT, as it was descending, in my example scenario, it came from high up, so that the wise men could see it for a short while, heading for Israel. One assume that they had knowledge of other things that allowed them to clue in it was special, so they went there to see for themselves. UFO's were not expected to be recorded, generally.
...you might wanna try to keep up with your own arguments
BTW - I am not shouting..just making sure you see the words and (hopefully) comprehend them.
Of course it was a localized event as explained, except for the possible UFO landing the wise men may have seen, to add to what they already may have known.
Um...YOU claimed that the location of heaven changed in order to gain credibility for your Babel argument. Can you back it up?
I think of heaven as a real big place. Not just the spiritual level that was above that part of earth near Babel.
The fact that they tried to build up to it there, can be referred to as trying to build a tower to heaven, though, of course. The universe change that left us this way, separated the spiritual from the physical, I posit. Not just that spiritual level near Babel. but our entire universe!! The fabric of matter, fundamental forces, light, gravity, and everything. The onset of radioactive decay, for example. We were left in a PO universe, (Physical Only).
What changed for angels, and spirits that used to hang out in the spiritual level of the time of Babel, and before, was that they found themselves separate from the dimension of man. They just ain't here no more in the way they were. They can, of course visit here still, from their home, but they don't live here.
Care to back that up? And why in the world would the people in the story of Babel try to build a tower UP to heaven if heaven was BELOW THE EARTH? Are Paradise and Heaven two different places?? What is the difference between the two?
We don't know if there was a paradise below the earth before the universe state change. We do know there was a heaven not that high up. At the time of Jesus, there was a place, apparently under the earth that was some sort of paradise. Possibly a temporary arrangement. Of course there is still is a spiritual realm under the earth, hell. But that's another story.
Like it was pointed out to you many times before, if heaven was purely a spiritual place then there would have been no threat posed by a physical tower built by humans. If the story was a spiritual allegory, another problem remains...namely, why would God deliberately stop in its tracks a communal effort among humans to build a "tower" to the divine realm of heaven which would provide them with peace and harmony. Why wouldn't God reward such a "Christian" concept?
Well, we really just don't know all that. Why men would have apparently become immortal, upon reaching the spiritual level, is beyond our PO grasp. Just like why eating the tree of life would have reversed the curse, and allowed us to live forever! That had to be stopped as well.
Instead God caused confusion and discord...WHY? So it would make his ultimate plan for "Peace" that much harder?? So it would be that much harder for the message of Jesus to carry to all the nations?? Maybe it's just me and my puny human mind, but "unconditional love" does not require tests or convoluted games. If it was "all part of the Plan" it seems like a confused, sadistic mess, to me.
Such big questions for such a little thread. My opinion is that Babel had almost nothing to do with it. It just happened to happen at the time of a big change in the universe God needed to effect. The change that was foretold before the flood, that something was coming down in 120 years for man.
It was about that time also, that the continents separated, and our lifespans were on the way down down down. (usually we think of the graph for that starting at the flood, but this was 101 years after the flood, or so, and we could drop the lifespans right at this point!!!)
Heaven was within reach of the physical then. At least part of it. We can no longer build up to the spiritual level. Jesus is the stairway to heaven!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by Jaderis, posted 10-22-2007 2:38 AM Jaderis has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 209 of 278 (429862)
10-22-2007 4:18 AM
Reply to: Message 202 by arachnophilia
10-22-2007 12:55 AM


Arach gets the boot
like i said, you just go right on making stuff up. first, it doesn't apply to god in that verse. it applies to judah. it's HIS rule jacob is talking about. second, not every shiny object is the same thing.
Your opinion.
49:10 - The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
"...by Judah is meant the tribe, and to say a tribe shall not depart from the tribe, is not only a tautology, but scarcely sense; it rather signifies dominion, power, and authority, as the sceptre always does, it being an emblem of it, see (Numbers 24:17) (Zechariah 10:11) and this intends either the government, which was in the heads and princes of the tribe, which commenced as soon as it became a tribe, and lasted as long as it remained one, even unto the times of the Messiah; or kingly power and government, which the sceptre is generally thought to be an emblem of, "
Genesis 49 - Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org
remember now, this is god talking to david. not vice versa. it's david's kingdom, and david's throne, granted to him by god. or does david have a spaceship too?
David died remember. The ultimate fulfillment comes from the Messiah, that came from David. David did depart before Shiloh go here! David never had a sceptre! David did not look down on Shiloh from afar. No sense pretending yours is the only opinion. there is a lot of opinions.
no, simple, i was talking about your ignorance. you should feel free to admit when you don't know something. which is apparently quite frequently, seeing has 99% of your postings are simply made up nonsense.
I know the ark is in heaven. If they "find" "the" ark, it is a fake. If it carbon dates to the right time, it is because it is the replica. You know no different.
that's not what the verse says. the verse says judah would rule until the end of time.
Not at all! It says the sceptre, representing God's rule. will not depart, till Jesus comes. Stop making stuff up.
simple, i was discussing the OP. if you don't like people being on topic that's your issue.
Them make sure you are clear about what ting is what.
the text does not say where they went.
It says they went to the house. It never names the city. Way back in Bethlehem, it was a stinking manger. So, we can rule that out. Mary was living in Nazareth, and the bible time lines have quite a bit of time here, so why would she NOT have gone home???? That is what one would expect she would do. Not cluck in some barn, in some town she had only went to on short term business. That is as ridiculous as saying a lady gave birth at the airport, and should still be there 2 years later!!! Absurd.
god wasn't physically there? have you READ exodus? seriously. pillar of fire by day, pillar of smoke at night. leading the way through the desert.
Well I did see the movie ten commandments. Ha. Now, smoke and "fire" do not need to be the physical kind we think of and know. That is silly. Need proof?? Look at the fire in the bush that burned!!! It was not physical fire!
you were basically saying that "you can't trust jews" to get the description of the messiah right. nevermind that it's their religion and their definitions. again, you are literally speaking ill of the people who wrote the bible, saying their books are lies. do you not see the issue with this?
Jesus spoke ill of them as well. They were His enemies, and liars, and known to pay great sums to fool people into thinking He never arose. The records of that day can not be trusted. Obviously.
no. his silence speaks volumnes. look. let's say, hypothetically, that some great work of art is missing, say the mona lisa. if you were in charge of the louvre's inventory after ww2, and you failed to mention the mona lisa, and when we go check the museum now, it's not there -- did it disappear last thursday, or after ww2?
No. I disagree. You never started an ark thread. So too bad, I don't have all night for side issues.
you mean thing? you keeping using "ting." why? it's gotta be on purpose. you're not even making sense, either way.
You need to be clear on that thing you are talking about.
do you really not understand how noah's ark -- a boat -- is a completely different thing than the ark of the covenant -- a box covered in gold and topped by two cherubim, designed to carry the ten commandments, and a few other relic?
The point was that in both arks, He did stuff. One time, He had coes cart the ark back to a place. No humans needed. Don't leave God out of the ark picture. Start a thread, or forget it.
then it was destroyed when the temple was burned to the ground. remember, first and second temples -- there was a period in between when there was nothing there because the first temple was destroyed. the second temple had to be BUILT. it's not just a fruity naming system. there really were two physical temples. now, if you wanna talk simple remodelling, herod the great (you know, that madman from above) remodeled the second temple quite extravagantly. it was still called "the second temple."
Like I would let you derail a thread, given every opportunity to start an ark thread? No.
I said my piece on that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by arachnophilia, posted 10-22-2007 12:55 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by arachnophilia, posted 10-22-2007 7:56 PM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 210 of 278 (429865)
10-22-2007 4:53 AM
Reply to: Message 203 by arachnophilia
10-22-2007 1:06 AM


*sigh* not fired. killed. do you really not understand how being a king worked? you don't fire a king. you depose them. violently. a new king in israel, that wasn't herod's son, meant revolution, rebellion, and a violent coup.
He was a paranoid delusional.
what? how did you get that from what i said? no, they saw a star, not a ufo. they gathered information from the star -- something routine in astrology, but that a UFO cannot do.
Prove it. What info could a star give, that the starship of the Almighty could not??
do you just live in your own little world or something? you've got a very vivid imagination. here's this object, a chariot, that appears once in a vision in the bible, and you're reading it all over the place, arbitrarily calling it certain names, and then interpretting anything with a similar name to be it. how ludicrous can you be?
It was the wheels of the Father. It was a throne. It flew. It was up high. The Christmas star was high, and seemed to fly, guiding the wise men. Coincidence?? It was also His son below! Coincidence??? He had said already He would see Shiloh from afar off. Coincidence? God is the One recorded in the bible as having the sceptre. Coincidence? There was a host near the manger, and Ezekiel's wheels, coincidence? Angesl too. Coincidence? The starship had the ability to give the shepherds a close encounter, (again the heavenly host was heard) and great light that shone down. Coincidence?
no. you missed the point. the point is that a bunch of astrologers saw it from 1,000 miles away, but the people right under it simply hadn't noticed. that points to a star (you know, like it says in the bible) and not a UFO.
You now claim that no UFO can be seen for 1000 miles. Interesting.
The space station can be seen from earth. In fact, from it, '''
"The first two modules of the station were launched andjoined in 1998. The first crew arrivedin 2000. Currently, American astronaut Peggy Whitson is on board with Russian cosmonauts Valery Korzun and Sergei Treschev, circling the Earth every 90 minutes at over 17,000 mph. When it is directly overhead, it is about 400 kilometers (250 miles) high."
404
If it was visible say, for four minutes, at 250 miles up, traveling 17,000 miles per hour, would we not see it more than a thousand miles away??
no, simple. i know a lot more about this subject than you do. not just the bible, but UFOs too. you don't know jack, but you keep coming in here with your ridiculous intepretations that plainly defy any rational reading of the text. you're making shit up, proof positive of someone who doesn't know jack.
Then, shouldn't your posts speak for themselves??? I haven't seen that happening. Why is that???
considering that astrology was punishable by death in israel, yes. only astrologers from a foreign country would have noticed. and only astrologers from persia would have cared. why persia? read the book of esther -- persia had an israelite queen. the two nations were on good terms.
The nations may have been on good terms, but knowledge was not limited to politics then. The wise men traveled, so it is safe to assume that knowledge could travel as well. You cannpt lock it up in Persia, just because it has a Jewish gal there. Nice try.
i'm suggesting that ezekiel's vision was not of a klingon bird of prey. it was a vision, laden with symbolic meanings and not reality. do you understand the difference?
Yes, you really don't think it flew!!!!!! You really don't think it had God in it up there!!! Or His throne!!!! How about angels, can you manage those??? Or are they fairy tales as well in your books??? I think we are starting to see where you are coming from here.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by arachnophilia, posted 10-22-2007 1:06 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by arachnophilia, posted 10-22-2007 8:31 PM simple has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024