Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 0/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discussing "29 evidences..."
derwood
Member (Idle past 1898 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 43 of 74 (1686)
01-08-2002 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by John Paul
01-08-2002 6:55 AM


quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:
John Paul:
From what I have read 'molecular clocks' are not only unreliable but also assume the ToE is indicative of reality.

When your sources for science are exclusively creationist books and web sites, then doubtless your understanding of the issues will be lacking.
It depends on which clocks you are talking about. There is no universal (global) molecular clock, since different loci mutate at different rates. Individual clocks, however, can be useful in the timing of long-term events due to the stochastic nature of the process.
The model of local molecular clocks - which assumes no constant mutation rate - has been used in studies in which dates inferred from clock calculations were strikingly similar to dates inferred from the fossil record.
Seems like more than coincidence, no?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by John Paul, posted 01-08-2002 6:55 AM John Paul has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024