Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,407 Year: 3,664/9,624 Month: 535/974 Week: 148/276 Day: 22/23 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Moral Relativism
John
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 284 (41095)
05-23-2003 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Majorsmiley
05-22-2003 1:31 PM


quote:
Why do you believe that this is correct? The immediate problem with this I see is if we focus on the source we utlimatley lead this discussion to the question of "Is there a God or is there no God?"
I agree with crash on the first question. There is no way to sort out absolute from relative morality. In essense, it is all relative-- relative to an individual or group's concept of the world.
For the second, I don't think the discussion needs to go there. For the purpose at hand, we could simply assume that a God exists and ask "which one?" We end up in the same position as before.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Majorsmiley, posted 05-22-2003 1:31 PM Majorsmiley has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 284 (41277)
05-25-2003 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by crashfrog
05-24-2003 1:24 PM


Circumcision irritates me too, crash.
quote:
Yeah, you are whining. By this logic we shouldn't bother tying off the umbilical cord. No surgery should ever be performed on infants, right? Not even beneficial ones?
Necessary surgery is in a different class than cosmetic surgery, yes? Then your conclusions just don't follow. If the kid is going to die, do something. But unnecessary surgery?
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 05-24-2003 1:24 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by crashfrog, posted 05-25-2003 2:30 PM John has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 284 (41794)
05-30-2003 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by crashfrog
05-30-2003 12:43 PM


quote:
Many people would rather be safe than free, apparently.
... which is exactly why our government is taking away our freedoms.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by crashfrog, posted 05-30-2003 12:43 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 284 (46660)
07-21-2003 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Peter
07-21-2003 7:04 AM


quote:
... since most founded in religions are prescriptive and lead people to act in a manner that is counter to full enjoyment of life.
Agreed. I tend to think, though, that moral codes have less to do with enjoyment and more to do with survival. That said, we are smart enough to weave in the happy-camper factor, if we could just leave out the superstition.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Peter, posted 07-21-2003 7:04 AM Peter has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024