Harm in Homosexuality?

It would appear he is hinting that anal intercourse is a harm of homosexuality. It seems he is somewhat naive.

There are independent rules of logic which are agreed to before they are applied. The reasons for them can be articulated and examined.When they are applied they produce unique results. This is not true of all forms of reasoning.In general when there are disagreements it is because of different assessments of the inputs rather than the logical steps.That said, logic of this type of rigor is not what is used when arriving at many scientific conclusions. It may only support part of it.

Probably right since we are badly off topic it seems. I don't think you should close it though untill it has reached the 300 mark.It seems we could spin off a logic thread though.

Up to now I thought I understood and agreed with your position Holmes. Suddenly it has gotten a bit more complex than I think is needed.I thought you were saying:Remove all references to marriage in the secular legal realm. Change all such usages to "civil union". Allow for same sex civil unions. Let the churchs perform, define and authorize "marriages" utterly separately from any reference to legal matters.Then you have handled the traditional hang ups on the word, allow churchs complete freedom to do as they please with no reason to be afraid of being forced into anything they don't agree with.You put everyone on the same legal grounds with no, I would think, constitutional issues.Why risk there being any chance of the two things (marriage and union) being able to diverge in anyway. (There will be pressure to have that happen I'm sure.)