Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religion in Government
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 10 of 303 (111322)
05-28-2004 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by JCPalmer
05-28-2004 9:17 PM


This nation was founded in the name of God. It was and is its freedom that allows you to "not believe in God"
Funny, without God you might have never had that chance to "not belive in God"
The real problem isn't God anyway. Its mans interpretation of him. If a man was capable of interpreting God's word wrong, then he is possible of interpreting anything wrong. So a president would be an idiot if he belived in God or not. Same for anyone else in politics.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JCPalmer, posted 05-28-2004 9:17 PM JCPalmer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by JCPalmer, posted 05-29-2004 12:34 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 17 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 7:17 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 24 of 303 (111439)
05-29-2004 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by JCPalmer
05-29-2004 12:34 AM


I can only assume you mean, because of God I was given the chance to not believe in him. Granting me the freedom of thought? Well, I do not believe in a God, so there was no one to grant me this freedom. Funny how without God, humans would never have fought in all those 'crusades.'
More specifically, mans belief in him, led them to go and find America and make it free. The people who discovered America, did not proclaim it in the name of freedom, they planted a cross on the beach when they landed, and proclaimed it in the name of God. The site still exists to this day.
All the laws of the constitution were written in the spirit of God. Religion was to be sperated from state so that one person could not control both, because he would then have all the power.
I never stated a problem in God, I was stating a problem within religious beliefs and the Government. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'am not too familiar with the Governmental and Political Process of God, does he have any? Is his word relevant and or should it be relevant in a time of war? I don't ever remember him negotiating a peaceful process to solve World War I, World War II, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom... the list goes on... and on... Or perhaps as you stated he intended this nation which was founded in his name to allow slavery for so many years? So until he as intervened, which, well looks unlikely to me, I believe is word should not be taken into consideration on how to govern our nation.
Gods word is not always followed correctly, and if it was, could probably end wars, or even better yet not even get started.
Slavery was part of the Bible, so they didn't believe it was wrong.
I believe God intended for there to be slaves, but not the way we know it. It was only supposed to be more like a job, not slavery. They should have always been allowed to be free.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by JCPalmer, posted 05-29-2004 12:34 AM JCPalmer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 11:19 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 26 by JCPalmer, posted 05-29-2004 2:50 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 42 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 11:09 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 47 by Ediacaran, posted 05-30-2004 1:28 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 34 of 303 (111496)
05-29-2004 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Rrhain
05-29-2004 7:17 AM


Now you are just making stuff up.
The constitution was written way after the first landing of which I speak of. It was then that they placed a cross on the sand, and said a prayer to God, proclaiming this land in his name.
The constitution was written by Christians with God in their hearts, who were smart enough to not include church and state together. They didn't need to write anything about God, because we have the Bible which explains that.
Here is a web-site with some truths about God and our founders.
Angelfire - error 404
Here is a picture of the first landing site with the cross still there, now in stone.
Angelfire - error 404
Here, some more stuff you probably won't read:
CBN.com - The Christian Broadcasting Network
Incorrect. It is because the founding fathers knew the perils of having religion and government intertwined that they specifically and deliberately wrote the Constitution to separate the two.
Not true, it was their believe that brought about the whole thing to begin with. The separation of church and state is not to be confused with God and state. Everywhere you look it is written:
ONE NATION UNDER GOD.
I wonder why?
Did you not "not believe in the Invisible Pink Unicorn" until you were just told about here?
You seem to think that atheists go around constantly ranting, "There is no god! There is no god!" The thing about atheism is that you really don't think about it. What is the point of wasting time cogitating over something that doesn't exist?
That has nothing to do with this thread, keep your thoughts on the subject at hand, and try not to get so emotional.
For the last time, do not put words in my mouth, it dis-respects me, and makes you look foolish.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 7:17 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 8:09 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 44 by JCPalmer, posted 05-29-2004 11:20 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 46 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 11:56 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 35 of 303 (111501)
05-29-2004 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by jar
05-29-2004 11:19 AM


Are you sure of that? If so, can you provide some idea of when and where this happened?
What was it they were running from? Looking for?
Yes they were smart to separate religion from state. But not God.
In God we trust.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 11:19 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 8:16 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 38 by NosyNed, posted 05-29-2004 8:24 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 48 of 303 (111587)
05-30-2004 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by NosyNed
05-29-2004 8:24 PM


Re: Try a bit harder?
Its amazing that people would ever even dare to think that this country wasn't founded with God in mind.
All of our court rooms, and congress, and money has the words "In God we Trust".
Thats my point, that this country was founded by people who believed in God, and tried to follow his word.
Its the people today trying to twist that all around and say that it has nothing to do with our country that are screwed in the head. They should state their real reason for not wanting to have anything to do with God, rather than making up lies.
God has everything to do with this country whether you believe in him or not. To suggest that our president should not be allowed to have God on his heart because it would interfere with running the country is just so....(I don't even have a word for it.)
This topic is pointless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by NosyNed, posted 05-29-2004 8:24 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by jar, posted 05-30-2004 6:41 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 58 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 3:01 AM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 49 of 303 (111588)
05-30-2004 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Ediacaran
05-30-2004 1:28 PM


Jefferson was the biggest christian of them all.
Those who framed our great Constitution acknowledged that, as God's creatures, we must hold the Federal government accountable to us, so that, as God's stewards, we can be accountable to Him.
This message has been edited by riVeRraT, 05-30-2004 04:31 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Ediacaran, posted 05-30-2004 1:28 PM Ediacaran has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by jar, posted 05-30-2004 5:40 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 51 by Chiroptera, posted 05-30-2004 5:49 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 52 of 303 (111593)
05-30-2004 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Rrhain
05-29-2004 11:09 PM


How can the constitution be written in the spirit of god if it violates the very first commandment of god?
Because God gave us the right to sin of we so choose.
They followed suit.
You really have no idea what slavery is, do you?
I think you don't. Not all slaves were slaves by force.
But most were. Some believed they had to be slaves to a particular group based on beliefs, and punishments from God. It was of their own thinking.
Just in case you are thinking that I think slavery is ok, its not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 11:09 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by jar, posted 05-30-2004 5:59 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 59 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 3:05 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 55 of 303 (111610)
05-30-2004 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by jar
05-30-2004 5:59 PM


No, that being a slave was a step up from what they had.
If there was a choice to be a slave or die from starvation.
Also a belief in God, could lead you to become a slave based on a punishment. Not by force.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by jar, posted 05-30-2004 5:59 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 3:07 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 63 of 303 (111806)
05-31-2004 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rrhain
05-31-2004 3:05 AM


You did not just say that, did you?
Are you seriously saying that some of the black people in Africa willingly and deliberately decided to be packed in like sardines in order to become objects?
You really have no idea what slavery is, do you?
WHAT? you amaze me, how you got that from what I said. lmao
What does that have to do with the topic?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 3:05 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 7:56 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 64 of 303 (111808)
05-31-2004 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Rrhain
05-31-2004 3:07 AM


You think slavery is limited to Africans, then your the one who doesn't know what salvery is, or the history of it.
Any clue how slavery started in America?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 3:07 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 8:01 PM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 75 of 303 (112008)
06-01-2004 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Rrhain
05-31-2004 7:56 PM


This is where you got my thoughts mixed up.
It was a response to someone who mentioned about slavery and the bible.
My comments on slavery were never pertaining to slavery in America.
For which I stand totally against, and I believe the bible would support that also.
message 11
Or perhaps as you stated he intended this nation which was founded in his name to allow slavery for so many years
He was using the fact of slavery in America as a reason for not allowing God in the government.
God allowed slavery to happen for a reason. I don't know what that reason is.
Many people suffer from God's wrath, justification, from following him, and many more reasons. I cannot give you the answers to why this happens, I can only speak for my own pain from God. For which I feel was justified.
Therefor I cannot go on to say that because of slavery, it is not a good idea to have people in our government who believe in God.
One possiblity is that slavery in America came from man, but God allowed it to happen for awhile. Why I am not sure, but it did start with man.
Edited to add a thought. If God wasn't really on the hearts of our founders(like most in here are claiming), then that might explain why slavery happened?
I don't know.
Either way, I don't see anything wrong with having people in our government who believe in God, or don't. There enough checks and balances for the time being that our freedom to believe in God is safe. Once it is not safe, then its just prophecy being fulfilled.
This message has been edited by riVeRraT, 06-01-2004 08:11 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 7:56 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by jar, posted 06-01-2004 10:30 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 86 by Rrhain, posted 06-07-2004 12:46 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 76 of 303 (112009)
06-01-2004 9:14 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Rrhain
05-31-2004 8:01 PM


So we agree there are many kinds of slavery?
Including being a slave to righteousness?
Or being a slave to sin?
If so, why would you then limit my thoughts to one kind of slavery?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Rrhain, posted 05-31-2004 8:01 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by jar, posted 06-01-2004 10:30 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 87 by Rrhain, posted 06-07-2004 12:48 AM riVeRraT has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 80 of 303 (112040)
06-01-2004 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by jar
06-01-2004 10:30 AM


Then you are right, and I am wrong. But then so is the person who is trying to blame slavery on God completely.
I personally feel as though forced slavery is against God's will.
I will bow out of this subject, due to my ignorance, and lack of time to study it. I will say that, the way I relate to God's word, I would see no problem having people who feel the same way in office.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by jar, posted 06-01-2004 10:30 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by NosyNed, posted 06-01-2004 11:38 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 82 by jar, posted 06-01-2004 12:08 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 83 of 303 (112352)
06-02-2004 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by NosyNed
06-01-2004 11:38 AM


Re: Good Job
Amen to that brothers.
I always have alot to learn.
It is amazing how much ground the bible does cover though.
To me God is love (among other things), love in the truest sense of the word.
Given that thought, I still don't see a reason for us not to be "One nation under God"
There is nothing in there that says you have to believe in him. You are free not to, thats the important thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by NosyNed, posted 06-01-2004 11:38 AM NosyNed has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 90 of 303 (113266)
06-07-2004 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by Rrhain
06-07-2004 12:46 AM


First off, I already admitted that I wasn't qualified to discuss this subject anymore.
Secondly, God was not responsible for slavery in the U.S. It was started by and run by man, and it was a sin. Then man would be punished for his sins. God cannot be responsible for mans short comings, or manmade disasters.
So if you were president, would you fight for your religious values or would you fight for the Constitution?
I would fight for the constitution and what the people want. Majority rules. Anything after that I would have to pray for.
Take, for example, your opposition to legal equality for gay people. That is in direct violation to the Constitutional demand for equal treatment under the law.
Don't go bringing that in here, it is off-topic. That thread was closed already. It is also wrong of you to describe what I feel, you are incorrect as you do not understand my stand point on that subject. I will not discuss it further.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Rrhain, posted 06-07-2004 12:46 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Ediacaran, posted 06-07-2004 11:17 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 101 by Rrhain, posted 06-12-2004 7:52 PM riVeRraT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024