Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What led you to God?
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 241 of 300 (279844)
01-18-2006 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 229 by nwr
01-18-2006 1:27 AM


Re: Did robinrohan say that on purpose?
Robin says that a car has purpose, but that a human does not have purpose
A car has an objective, formal purpose.
Humans have subjective purposes. All subjective purposes are in the long run arbitrary. One might say, my purpose in life is to help poor people. Another might say, my purpose in life is to turn all corners into curves, because curves are more beautiful than corners.
These two purposes are both equally subjective in the long run.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by nwr, posted 01-18-2006 1:27 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by nwr, posted 01-18-2006 12:12 PM robinrohan has not replied

lfen
Member (Idle past 4698 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 242 of 300 (279845)
01-18-2006 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 240 by robinrohan
01-18-2006 10:49 AM


Re: objective purpose
Robin,
Well, can you relate purpose to children or the caring for children?
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 10:49 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 10:56 AM lfen has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 243 of 300 (279846)
01-18-2006 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by lfen
01-18-2006 10:55 AM


Re: objective purpose
Well, can you relate purpose to children or the caring for children?
It's another subjective purpose. Take your pick.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 10:55 AM lfen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 245 by Phat, posted 01-18-2006 11:12 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 244 of 300 (279847)
01-18-2006 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 218 by Jon
01-17-2006 6:33 PM


Re: objective purpose
Who is to say that the formal purpose of that car is to get from A to B, and not simply to spin tires really fast? I'd have to wonder if the inventor of the car himself would even be able to list a single formal purpose.
This makes no sense to me. It seems obvious to me that the formal purpose of a car is to propel people around from place to place.
As I said before, one might devise all sorts of other purposes for a car, but none of these are the formal purpose. You could use it as a decorative item. Young boys could use it as a place to hide out and smoke. You could use it as a music-maker and never drive the thing at all. You could use it as research project on toxic emissions. You could use it as the subject of a poem--"Ode on a Chevy." These are all personal purposes, not formal.
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 01-18-2006 10:03 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by Jon, posted 01-17-2006 6:33 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:23 AM robinrohan has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 245 of 300 (279852)
01-18-2006 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 243 by robinrohan
01-18-2006 10:56 AM


Re: objective purpose
websters writes:
1ob”jec”tive adj 1 : of or relating to an object or end 2 : existing outside and independent of the mind 3 : of, relating to, or constituting a grammatical case marking typically the object of a verb or preposition 4 : treating or dealing with facts without distortion by personal feelings or prejudices ” ob”jec”tive”ly adv ” ob”jec”tive”ness n ” ob”jec”tiv”i”ty \'b-'jek-"ti-v-t\ n
2objective n 1 : the lens (as in a microscope) nearest the object and forming an image of it 2 : an aim, goal, or end of action
sub”jec”tiveadj 1 : of, relating to, or constituting a subject 2 : of, relating to, or arising within one's self or mind in contrast to what is outside : personal ” sub”jec”tive”ly adv ” sub”jec”tiv”i”ty \-'jek-"ti-v-t\ n
I suppose that it is debateable whether the purpose is entirly within ones own mind or whether it arose outside of the mind.
This message has been edited by Phat, 01-18-2006 09:13 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 10:56 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 246 of 300 (279854)
01-18-2006 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 219 by Jon
01-17-2006 6:40 PM


Why should that matter? Dying and rotting in the ground is something I would most desperately like to prevent, but I cannot. So, while I'm sitting here, I think I should make the most of my time.
Well, that's perfectly sensible. I'm telling you what seems to me the fact about the nature of human life. Our lives are ephemeral, of no more significance than the howling wolves, or for that matter, the fly we just swatted.
I'll tell you in what sense this fact matters to me: I'm not interested in maintaining a view of human life that is laced with sentimentality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Jon, posted 01-17-2006 6:40 PM Jon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:37 AM robinrohan has replied

lfen
Member (Idle past 4698 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 247 of 300 (279857)
01-18-2006 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 244 by robinrohan
01-18-2006 11:02 AM


Re: objective purpose
Robin,
Are you using "purpose" as synonymous with "function" as in use?
It seems obvious to me that the formal purpose of a car is to propel people around from place to place.
Humans use things, even other humans. You are wanting humans to have been designed by something else to be used for some purpose this something else has? Why? Why can't humans have their own purpose(s)?
I'm really not understanding what this discussion is about, or why or where the problem is.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 244 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 11:02 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by jar, posted 01-18-2006 11:26 AM lfen has replied
 Message 249 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 11:28 AM lfen has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 414 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 248 of 300 (279858)
01-18-2006 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 247 by lfen
01-18-2006 11:23 AM


Re: objective purpose
What is the purpose of a stick?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:23 AM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 2:37 PM jar has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 249 of 300 (279859)
01-18-2006 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 247 by lfen
01-18-2006 11:23 AM


Re: objective purpose
Are you using "purpose" as synonymous with "function" as in use?
That's right.
You are wanting humans to have been designed by something else to be used for some purpose this something else has?
It's not a matter of what I want. I'm just stating what seems to be the nature of human life. We have no objective purpose in living. We have purposes that we make up--that's all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:23 AM lfen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Faith, posted 01-18-2006 12:39 PM robinrohan has not replied

AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 250 of 300 (279860)
01-18-2006 11:34 AM


50 Posts to EOT
Just a reminder that threads close at 300 posts.
Carry on Purple

lfen
Member (Idle past 4698 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 251 of 300 (279861)
01-18-2006 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 246 by robinrohan
01-18-2006 11:16 AM


Robin,
Emotion and sentiment are a part of the function of the human brain. They are part of our experience, of the way we view life. I suspect only sociopaths are capable of holding a viewpoint that doesn't contain something of sentimentality that is to say are capable of not caring about anyone or anything else in the world.
Have you read any of U.G. Krishnamurti?
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 11:16 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 255 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 12:58 PM lfen has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 252 of 300 (279863)
01-18-2006 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 241 by robinrohan
01-18-2006 10:55 AM


Re: Did robinrohan say that on purpose?
One might say, my purpose in life is to help poor people.
We could test that, by observing your behavior. If we discover that you are the CEO of a corporation that makes its income by ripping off poor people, we would have excellent reasons to dispute that it is your purpose.
A car has an objective, formal purpose.
Here is how to determine the purpose of a car.
Start the motor. Put the car in gear. Then jump out. Now watch the behavior of the car as it carries out its purpose.
After that test, I think you might agree that a car has no purpose. It has a use (for us), but not a purpose.
What you are calling a "formal purpose" of the car is really your purpose for the car. It isn't the car's purpose at all.
Humans don't have a formal purpose (as you use that term), only because we don't have purposes for other people. There were times in the past when it was common to have purposes for other people. But, thank God, slavery was abolished and we don't do that any more.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 241 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 10:55 AM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Faith, posted 01-18-2006 12:49 PM nwr has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 253 of 300 (279867)
01-18-2006 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 249 by robinrohan
01-18-2006 11:28 AM


Re: objective purpose
Lfen writes:
Are you using "purpose" as synonymous with "function" as in use?
quote:
RR: That's right.
Lfen: You are wanting humans to have been designed by something else to be used for some purpose this something else has?
quote:
RR: It's not a matter of what I want. I'm just stating what seems to be the nature of human life. We have no objective purpose in living. We have purposes that we make up--that's all.
What you are saying is so clear and logical, why doesn't anyone get it? And you DID say it better than I did, in fewer words. More than once.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 11:28 AM robinrohan has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 254 of 300 (279868)
01-18-2006 12:49 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by nwr
01-18-2006 12:12 PM


Re: Did robinrohan say that on purpose?
Subjective purposes (or what I called lower-case plural purposes), are determined by ourselves or by the thing itself.
Cars don't have subjective purposes.
Objective purposes (or what I called capital-P Purpose), are determined by the maker of the thing, including human beings IF we have a Maker, and IF He had a reason for making us rather than just tossing a bunch of nuts and bolts together, or making a chemical soup to see what it could do.
RR is right about the objective Purpose of cars. Yes, their use is their formal Purpose, or their objective Purpose. What they were made for.
If we have no Maker, he is also right about there being no formal Purpose or objective Purpose for human beings. We have only our varied subjective purposes.
This message has been edited by Faith, 01-18-2006 01:03 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by nwr, posted 01-18-2006 12:12 PM nwr has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 256 by robinrohan, posted 01-18-2006 12:59 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 258 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 2:51 PM Faith has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 255 of 300 (279870)
01-18-2006 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 251 by lfen
01-18-2006 11:37 AM


I suspect only sociopaths are capable of holding a viewpoint that doesn't contain something of sentimentality that is to say are capable of not caring about anyone or anything else in the world.
I'm not talking about "not caring." Of course one cares about other people and about one's activities. A sentimental view of human life is one in which one adopts a certain belief because it makes one feel good (or bad, for that matter), or one slurs over what human life is really like with vague, pleasant-sounding comments, or one ignores what human life is really like completely. By "human life," I mean human life as a whole, not the life of this or that person.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 11:37 AM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by lfen, posted 01-18-2006 3:03 PM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024