Jesus's motives for performing miracles.

question: why was only this specific generation chosen to be demonstrated to ?how are we -200 generations removed- supposed to believe ?

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

yes, I understand all that. I'm just saying that if Jesus thought that those who didn't see were blessed, then why did be bother to show anyone at all?He could have just said he was the Son of God and leave them to it. Those who believed him would be truly blessed, as he said.Instead, he chose to break his own principle and reveal his true nature but only to a specific audience at a specific time and place.I just don't understand why he would do that. If, like you claim, he wanted to demonstrate that he was God, then surely he could do it in a way that all people on earth at that time would notice, or in a way that everyone in that place ever after would notice.If on the other hand he values faith, like he said, why is he only requesting it from us but not them?It's a mystery to me!

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

but the only way the rest of us could have the same foundation for faith in Him they had, would be to witness the miracles ourselves!Second-hand accounts do not provide the same foundation for faith (trust) as first-hand witnessing!Jesus could have made miracles demonstrable through the ages for all of us to see. He didn't.Why did he choose to provide that extra evidence to only a select amount of people ?

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

he could have given us the ball itself. He didn't. Why did he favour those few people over the rest of mankind ? many more haven't then why didn't he send it to his followers so that they would be convinced, instead of performing miracles ?He did say that those who believe without seeing are blessed, after all!

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

if you saw a portrait of Tom and a portrait of Harry side-by-side would you call it a steresocopic vision of Tom? or a steresocopic vision of Harry ?the synoptics portray Tom, John's gospel portrays Harry (Tom's mystical, hellenistic brother).

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

Reading the verses above that one, it seems that an equally valid reason for his weeping was guilt, rather than compassion.Besides, I'm not purporting compassion to be totally asbent from John's Jesus, instead that in John it's just a sidenote, a minor quirk, while in the synoptics it's the main focus of Jesus's life and teachings.

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

It's because you've already made the choice of amalgamating the two into one (as per your previous "stereoscopic vision" analogy). The synoptics focus on a fiery yet compassionate preacher who teaches that good deeds will see you through in the kingdom of heaven. John focuses on a meta-physical divine being whose main role is living out a pre-arranged scenario in order to 'redeem' us.If they're all based on eyewitness accounts (as you and most Christians believe), then it really does come down to a crossroads:
Either Jesus made a hell of a contradictory impression on people around him
Or One of the two lines of gospel authors knew very little about Jesus and was instead pursuing its own theological interests.Just because you've chosen the first option doesn't mean that the dividing line isn't there.

---

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."