Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jesus's motives for performing miracles.
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 16 of 69 (357843)
10-20-2006 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by subbie
10-20-2006 6:58 PM


I didn't mention it first because it WASN'T the most important reason, but that didn't mean it wasn't always part of the motivation, as you were implying. The most important reason was that we know that He is God. That's also the most compassionate reason. I already said this.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by subbie, posted 10-20-2006 6:58 PM subbie has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 17 of 69 (357846)
10-20-2006 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Legend
10-20-2006 6:55 PM


Re: what about us?
Legend writes:
I'm just saying that if Jesus thought that those who didn't see were blessed, then why did be bother to show anyone at all? He could have just said he was the Son of God and leave them to it. Those who believed him would be truly blessed, as he said.
Exactly, why give any proof at all if 'faith' is the conduit of salvation?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Legend, posted 10-20-2006 6:55 PM Legend has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 18 of 69 (357850)
10-20-2006 7:38 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Faith
10-20-2006 11:28 AM


Faith writes:
"Pseudonatural?" What does that mean?
Sorry Faith, thought supernatural would be insulting to people of faith.
Faith writes:
You can't have faith unless you have evidence.
I would contend that this is exactly wrong. Evidence removes the need for faith. If your god came down from it's cloud and said " look here you, I'm real" I would sure as hell believe it. Thats evidence, not faith.
Faith writes:
and it gives a foundation for believing the gospel of salvation.
I thought the meaage of the gospel (thanks Iano) was the salvation from the acceptance of ones sin and the acknowledgement of the role of Jesus in our salvation. Rather than an agreement that Jesus was divine by the evidence of miracles. Thats my point. Why miracles?
Faith writes:
What would there be to have faith IN in that case?
The words of Jesus?
Faith writes:
To demonstrate that He is indeed God and that one should put trust in Him.
Not required: if you have faith.
Faith writes:
Most of us creationists and Biblical Christians have argued all along that we DO have evidence, that the Bible is evidence.
Lets not do that dance.
Faith writes:
Glad you recognize that it is at least evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Faith, posted 10-20-2006 11:28 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 12:27 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 24 by iano, posted 10-21-2006 7:35 AM Larni has not replied

  
honda33
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 51
From: Antigua
Joined: 04-11-2006


Message 19 of 69 (357852)
10-20-2006 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Faith
10-20-2006 7:07 PM


He could also have struck Adam and Eve dead on the spot when they disobeyed.
Now that would have saved the world six thousand years of suffering and an eternity of torment.
He could also have refused to save even Noah and family and let the whole human race perish.
OK 4500 years of suffering.
He could have made it impossible for them to disobey
Zero suffering - no eternal torment
All these seem like better plans to me, however since God ways are higher than mine and He obviously loves suffering and torment, who am I to complain.
Anyway back to the topic
You stated
You can't have faith unless you have evidence
So how much evidence do you need to have faith?
If for instance I believe something for which I have very very very little evidence, is that faith?
Edited by honda33, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Faith, posted 10-20-2006 7:07 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 12:39 AM honda33 has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 20 of 69 (357856)
10-20-2006 8:54 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Faith
10-20-2006 11:28 AM


Far from it. See above. Most of us creationists and Biblical Christians have argued all along that we DO have evidence, that the Bible is evidence.
Let's forget the circular arguments for a second, I mean what else is Christianity if not circular?
But, you must have FAITH to believe that the Bible is an accurate record of events since you have bugger all outside of the Bible and much of the Bible has been falsified by science, history, and archaeology. At least to us sane folks it has.
Brian.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Faith, posted 10-20-2006 11:28 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 12:30 AM Brian has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 21 of 69 (357880)
10-21-2006 12:27 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Larni
10-20-2006 7:38 PM


Faith writes:
You can't have faith unless you have evidence.
I would contend that this is exactly wrong. Evidence removes the need for faith.
Well, I guess you can make up your own definitions if you want, but then I guess I can just dismiss it all as unrelated to anything people of faith actually believe too, no?
If your god came down from it's cloud and said " look here you, I'm real" I would sure as hell believe it. Thats evidence, not faith.
Two things here. 1) Faith is in what God SAYS to us, His promises, His statements about His character, His warnings, while the miracles are merely to confirm that He is who He says He is and that He does have the authority to require our obedience and to deserve our trust, that is, they are part of the basis on which we should invest our faith in His word.
2) The second thing is that you are leaving out the part about how those who saw the miracles wrote about them so that the rest of us could have the same foundation for faith in Him they had.
So you seem to be saying only the usual, that it's evidence if you see it, but not if others who saw it tell you about it. This is in fact what many people say. Thomas required to see it himself, but Jesus said believing His witnesses is a blessed thing, and that's what faith is.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Larni, posted 10-20-2006 7:38 PM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Legend, posted 10-21-2006 8:53 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 22 of 69 (357881)
10-21-2006 12:30 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Brian
10-20-2006 8:54 PM


But, you must have FAITH to believe that the Bible is an accurate record of events since you have bugger all outside of the Bible and much of the Bible has been falsified by science, history, and archaeology. At least to us sane folks it has.
So all of us are insane then. No matter to me. The Bible is self-authenticating to us crazy people.
And its authority falsifies everything that contradicts it, from science to history to archaeology to all the pretensions of Reason.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Brian, posted 10-20-2006 8:54 PM Brian has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 23 of 69 (357882)
10-21-2006 12:39 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by honda33
10-20-2006 8:02 PM


So how much evidence do you need to have faith?
Everyone is different.
If for instance I believe something for which I have very very very little evidence, is that faith?
I don't know. Faith implies trusting a person to the point of being willing to act on it, to trust that God is good and will do you good even if He asks you to sacrifice your only son as He did Abraham; even if He tells you to give up your own life rather than deny Him, etc. etc. etc. If what you believe leads to that kind of faith in a person then that's faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by honda33, posted 10-20-2006 8:02 PM honda33 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by honda33, posted 10-21-2006 11:42 AM Faith has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1962 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 24 of 69 (357910)
10-21-2006 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Larni
10-20-2006 7:38 PM


Faith = Evidence
Faith writes:
and it gives a foundation for believing the gospel of salvation.
Larni writes:
I thought the message of the gospel (thanks Iano) was the salvation from the acceptance of ones sin and the acknowledgement of the role of Jesus in our salvation. Rather than an agreement that Jesus was divine by the evidence of miracles. Thats my point. Why miracles?
A couple of points. "Salvation from the acceptance of ones sins": I'm not sure what this means. The gospel message (some of which we have covered so far) is as follows. It gives us the bad news first:
  • every man is born with the nature of being a sinner. And because he is born thus, he will sin. He will act according to nature. It is natural that he will sin
  • God by nature, is holy. He hates sin. He is right to hate it. His hatred isn't bad - it is righteous
  • sinners are seperated from relationship God. They are spiritually dead to God. If they die in this state they will remain in this state for eternity.
  • What God does in time against sin (pours out his wrath) he will do likewise in eternity: pour out his wrath.
  • This is bad news indeed for man. Even worse: man cannot do anything about it. Gods holiness demands that a man be righteous in order to have a relationship with God. A holy God cannot (by nature) have relationship with sinners.
  • Man cannot make himself right with God: not by following Gods law not by anything else.
The Gospel = the Good News
The gospel message is that God (whose nature is not only wrath against sin but also love for us) has done something about this state of affairs. He has provided a way whereby this state of affairs can be rectified for everyone who ever lived or will live. Although man by nature is doomed as he is (objects in motion will continue in a straight line unless acted upon by an exterior force (God), it does not have to be this way. That is good news. Even better, this way of salvation does not rely on man contributing to his salvation as all aspects of it are carried out by God. This way (or mechanism) of salvation takes, in other words, the form of a gift. It is good that man have no part in his gaining salvation: for if it relied on him then that mechanism might not work. Whereas the gospel, being the power of God, if applied to a man is sure to work. It is not sure it will be applied - that is true, but if applied then it will work.
That's the gospel. The workings of the gospel are a subset of that. The gospel is the engine if you like, the specifics of it, how it works are the componant parts of it. They are not so much the good news themselves but how the good news works.
Faith writes:
You can't have faith unless you have evidence.
Larni writes:
I would contend that this is exactly wrong. Evidence removes the need for faith. If your god came down from it's cloud and said " look here you, I'm real" I would sure as hell believe it. Thats evidence, not faith.
We have seen in the Romans thread that what the gospel is and what what salvation is and what righteousness is are what the Bible has to say about them. We should not force our own limitations upon such words. We saw (or will see) that salvation is a multifacetted thing: a man is declared righteous, a man ceases to be an enemy of God and becomes an adopted son, a man receives eternal life. A mans sins are forgiven him. He is placed in Christ etc etc
We have seen that faith can be pictured as a highway along which God transmits the righteousness of Christ to a person. That is its first function in the sense of it acting as a highway carrying goods: the initial transaction that takes place at the point of salvation. But clearly, before anything can be sent along a highway the highway must exist!
We see all over the gospels that a man must repent in order to be saved. We might take one aspect of repentance as genuine acceptance on a mans part that he is a sinner before God. Patently he must be convinced of two things before he can do this.
  • he must be convinced that God exists
  • he must be convinced that he is a sinner.
Another way of saying a man must be convinced is that a man must believe these two things. For man convinced is a man who believes. We have seen from above that man takes no part in his salvation. If this is true then a man believing is not a decision a man makes out of himself. He doesn't just wake up one normal day and believe God exists and that he is a sinner before God. He doesn't suddenly get a shiver down his spine because he decides to belief that the destination of sinners is as it is. No. Any man who believes something has at least some evidence for it. A little evidence then his belief is partial, tentitive. For him to be convinced of something however means he must have compelling evidence of that thing. For a man to believe the two items above he must have evidence.
I was watching 12 Angry Men last night which illustrates the point well. A murder trial jury was sitting determining the sentence for a man accused of murdering his father. 11 of the 12 had the initial conclusion that the man was guilty. He would go to the electric chair. One man dissented and set about convincing the others that there was a reasonable doubt as to whether he did it. The 11 were swung around by only one thing. The evidence which seemed to convict the man all had holes in it. On first sight it looked iron-clad but examining it brought out the holes. They became convinced by the evidence for holes - allowing a verdict of reasonable doubt to be valid. They didn't believe the man was innocent: they believed there was room for reasonable doubt. They came to this view due to the evidence presented that there were potential holes in the concrete evidence.
So, it is not that a man makes a evidentialess decision to believe. Believing something without evidence isn't belief, it is something else. Rather it is that a man is "in a state of belief". "Unless you believe" is not saying that unless we take some action or other we are doomed. No! Read it in this way: "Unless you are in the state of believing then you cannot be saved". It is a condition that man must be in. "Unless you are in a believing condition then you cannot be saved". The locks mechanism must be in the correct state in order for the key to turn in it. Think "state of being" - not "action I must take"
quote:
Hebrews 11:1 "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen"
Faith is substance and evidence. In the Romans thread we have seen the initial work that God applies to all men: the call on man through conscience, nature, Gods word. All aimed at turning a man back towards God. Aimed at bringing him to the conviction that he is a sinner. We might see all that work by God as preparing the foundations on the mans side for the highway that God wants to construct between himself and man. But salvation material cannot be transmitted with no highway in place. Foundations are not sufficient. At some point that highway called faith needs to be constructed. How is this achieved? Well, the construction materials of this highway have substance - you need substance to build things. And the nature of that substance is evidence. The highway spans the distance that exists between man and God and when it finally bridges the gap and lands on the prepared foundations on mans side of the divide then then the very first thing that happens is that a man believes totally. Why - because the nature of the highway itself is the very evidence a man needs to believe. And now that he has all the evidence he needs (the link between him and God has been established) he enters the state of belief. And once he enters that state of belief the condition for salvation has been satisfied. The goods involved with salvation can flow via the highway to the man. It's like an electrical circuit. First the circuit needs to be completed then the goods can flow. As with an electrical circuit the whole thing happens instantaniously. As soon as the circuit is completed, current flows.
It fits does it not? Consider:
A man is told he must repent, right? This he patently cannot do by himself. He cannot truly repent without believing. Unbelieving repentance is hollow and empty. Not heartfelt. And it is in the heart of a man this must take place
quote:
Romans 10:9 "...if you will confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved."
(nb: all the evidence required to enable this heartfelt belief in a man is enabled by that same completed highway constuction project - lest any should worry)
And a man is told to believe too, right? But he cannot believe without evidence. There is no such thing as belief without evidence. We might call such belief "wishful thinking" for that is its proper name. Or "sticking ones head in the sand". No! This belief must be heartfelt. A convinced belief.
So God gives man the evidence required. God constructs the highway of faith (a highway whose building blocks are evidence) and connects it to the man. The man now believes. He is fully convinced that God exists and that he is a sinner before God and all the rest of it. Because heartfelt belief is a requirement for heartfelt repentance a man can now repent in heartfelt fashion. This applies to any other thing that must be done heartfeltedly. He can believe heartfeltedly that Jesus Christ is Lord for example - its no different. It doesn't matter what it is he must believe he will now do so. He can now do it from his heart because he has been convinced and fully believes. It is not a choice on the mans part. He has been connected, by God, to the evidence - belief is as automatic as is current flowing in a completed circuit. And Goddidit.
We may well say then that there are conditions that must be fulfilled in order that a man be saved. This is true. But how often do we hear the works-based-salvationists say that "we must fulfill those conditions"? How gravely mistaken they are. Yes, we must indeed fulfill conditions: we must believe/repent/confess etc. But only in the passive sense. God is the one who takes all the actions that ensures a man fulfills those conditions. Yes, a child who plays the drums is playing the drums. But if his parent is the one holding his hands around the drumsticks and is moving the childs arms so as to beat the drums then we can see who it is who is actually playing the drums on the childs behalf. God does this simply and only because man is unable to fulfill those conditions himself. God does this because he loves man and he does it in this way because God is just. In saving a man the way he does, he doesn't break his own "rules". His rules being simply expressions of who he is. He acts consistant with who he is.
Faith is evidence. It enables salvation because it enables a man to believe: a condition of salvation. And subsequent to that point in time it does other things in like fashion. It enables a believer to trust God implicitly for instance. For having seen once what God has done one tends not to distrust him in their heart again. Sure there can be rough times, there can be doubt - even severe doubt brought about by tough times. But he is very gracious and always willing to rebuild damage caused to that bridge that was once built. He is always ready and willing to touch a person with faith again: to restore their confidence in him. He promises that no matter what happens that highway will never be destroyed. The connection between God and man, once established will last forever. He doesn't break his promises either
quote:
Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Quite...
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Larni, posted 10-20-2006 7:38 PM Larni has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 25 of 69 (357920)
10-21-2006 8:53 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Faith
10-21-2006 12:27 AM


Faith writes:
The second thing is that you are leaving out the part about how those who saw the miracles wrote about them so that the rest of us could have the same foundation for faith in Him they had.
but the only way the rest of us could have the same foundation for faith in Him they had, would be to witness the miracles ourselves!
Second-hand accounts do not provide the same foundation for faith (trust) as first-hand witnessing!
Jesus could have made miracles demonstrable through the ages for all of us to see. He didn't.
Why did he choose to provide that extra evidence to only a select amount of people ?

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 12:27 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by iano, posted 10-21-2006 9:07 AM Legend has replied
 Message 29 by AdminPD, posted 10-21-2006 10:20 AM Legend has not replied
 Message 32 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 1:14 PM Legend has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1962 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 26 of 69 (357921)
10-21-2006 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Legend
10-21-2006 8:53 AM


Why did he choose to provide that extra evidence to only a select amount of people ?
To get the ball rolling. Its rolled ever since. Many since then have been rolled over by it. They didn't need to see miracles with their own eyes - nor did I. Jesus said he would send the holy spirit in his place whose purpose it would be to convict the world of their need of him. His being God established there was no need to establish it again. The miracles go out, the Holy Spirit comes instead.
He considered it a fair trade. So do I. You don't. Your choice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Legend, posted 10-21-2006 8:53 AM Legend has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Legend, posted 10-21-2006 9:33 AM iano has replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 27 of 69 (357923)
10-21-2006 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by iano
10-21-2006 9:07 AM


miracles as proclamation of divinity
To get the ball rolling. Its rolled ever since.
he could have given us the ball itself. He didn't. Why did he favour those few people over the rest of mankind ?
Many since then have been rolled over by it.
many more haven't
Jesus said he would send the holy spirit in his place whose purpose it would be to convict the world of their need of him.
then why didn't he send it to his followers so that they would be convinced, instead of performing miracles ?
He did say that those who believe without seeing are blessed, after all!

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by iano, posted 10-21-2006 9:07 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by iano, posted 10-21-2006 10:00 AM Legend has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1962 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 28 of 69 (357926)
10-21-2006 10:00 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Legend
10-21-2006 9:33 AM


Re: miracles as proclamation of divinity
he could have given us the ball itself. He didn't. Why did he favour those few people over the rest of mankind ?
The ball rolling is the birth and expansion of Christianity. In order for this expansion there had to be a Big Bang. His birth, death, resurrection and all that goes with it.
You don't need a second big bang
He didn't favour anybody. Many saw the miracles and didn't believe. Miracles are evidence of a type. They are aimed at getting people to believe. Some do, some do not. The Holy Spirit aims to convince people today. He offers evidence of a type: some are convinced, some are not.
"Give me the miracles" you say. But if you were back then you might well have been one of those who did not believe them. You don't believe the evidence today when many others do. What's so different?
then why didn't he send it to his followers so that they would be convinced, instead of performing miracles ?
He said that unless he went the spirit couldn't come. Why? I don't know. But if that is what he said then I believe him. I don't think he ever lied or was ever wrong
He did say that those who believe without seeing are blessed, after all!
And they are. They have been. But they are no better than someone then who believed because of miracles. No one can believe without compelling evidence. Miracles, the evidence of faith - it all achieves the same end. And both come from God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Legend, posted 10-21-2006 9:33 AM Legend has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 29 of 69 (357931)
10-21-2006 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Legend
10-21-2006 8:53 AM


Topic Reminder
A reminder that this thread is about what was the motive for Jesus's miracles, not why we don't have miracles today.
What was the motive of Jesus in doing his miracles?
Do his miracles invalidate faith in xians because they give what many here at EVC have long asked for: evidence?
Please direct any comments concerning this Admin msg to the Moderation Thread.
Any response in this thread will receive a 24 hour timeout.
Thank you Purple

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Legend, posted 10-21-2006 8:53 AM Legend has not replied

  
honda33
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 51
From: Antigua
Joined: 04-11-2006


Message 30 of 69 (357939)
10-21-2006 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Faith
10-21-2006 12:39 AM


So how much evidence do you need to have faith?
Everyone is different.
If for instance I believe something for which I have very very very little evidence, is that faith?
I don't know. Faith implies trusting a person to the point of being willing to act on it, to trust that God is good and will do you good even if He asks you to sacrifice your only son as He did Abraham; even if He tells you to give up your own life rather than deny Him, etc. etc. etc. If what you believe leads to that kind of faith in a person then that's faith.
What I am getting at is your understanding of faith. I think we both agree that faith is believing something. But what makes a belief faith or "non-faith". Based on what you said before, a belief without evidence is not faith. So are there any other "non-faith" beliefs? How about a belief with conclusive evidence?
In addition what makes a faith greater than another?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 12:39 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Faith, posted 10-21-2006 12:40 PM honda33 has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024