Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,850 Year: 4,107/9,624 Month: 978/974 Week: 305/286 Day: 26/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Politcally Correct Christ
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 33 of 301 (346496)
09-04-2006 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Phat
09-04-2006 11:25 AM


Re: Eclectics of the world rejoice!
quote:
I still get irked when people call God a "she" though!
Im such a chauvenist Pig!
I hope your pique causes you to raise your awareness of the sexism inherent in the English language, and in Christianity.
Is your God male? Does God have a thingie?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Phat, posted 09-04-2006 11:25 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by arachnophilia, posted 09-04-2006 5:05 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 36 of 301 (346522)
09-04-2006 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by arachnophilia
09-04-2006 5:05 PM


Re: Eclectics of the world rejoice!
quote:
if we changed the gender neutral pronoun to "it" people (especially women) would get offended at being portrayed as objects and/or babies.
if we changed the gender neutral pronoun to "she," women would get offended that their gender now lacks meaning and distinction. see for instance the feminist take on calling boats by female names.
We can use "they" as a gender neutral pronoun.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by arachnophilia, posted 09-04-2006 5:05 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by ReverendDG, posted 09-04-2006 8:40 PM nator has not replied
 Message 41 by arachnophilia, posted 09-05-2006 2:39 AM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 37 of 301 (346526)
09-04-2006 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Hyroglyphx
09-03-2006 2:08 PM


quote:
There have been a number of subtle attacks on the divinity of Christ throughout the ages, however, in recent times it seems that the best way to undermine Jesus is just to invent ones' own cushy version of the Bible.
Isn't this true of every version of the bible?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-03-2006 2:08 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 38 of 301 (346527)
09-04-2006 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Hyroglyphx
09-04-2006 11:18 AM


Re: Sensitivity training
quote:
However, any text that claims holiness, including but not limited to, the Bible, the Vedas, the Qur'an, any teaching by Buddha, etc, should be exempt from tampering. Its sacrilege no matter how you spin it.
Does that mean that you read the Bible in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-04-2006 11:18 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 45 of 301 (346629)
09-05-2006 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by ReverendDG
09-05-2006 3:55 AM


Re: Eclectics of the world rejoice!
quote:
sure i do this too, it doesn't mean it should be done, its confusing and bad english.
Using "he" to refer to women is confusing.
Saying that it is "bad english" is just a resistance to the inevitable evolution of language.
We don't speak the same English that was spoken 200 years ago. Do we speak "bad" English?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by ReverendDG, posted 09-05-2006 3:55 AM ReverendDG has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Phat, posted 09-05-2006 9:03 AM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024