Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Politcally Correct Christ
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3623 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 181 of 301 (348686)
09-13-2006 8:33 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by iano
09-13-2006 6:59 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
iano:
I follow some of the laws all the time, I follow all of the laws some of the time (usually when I am sleeping).
You follow the Rosh Hoshana law while you are sleeping?
But I don't follow all of the laws all of the time. Some of the laws (lust for example) I dance all over on occasion
Interesting. This is exactly the kind of inconsistency you, Faith, and Robin claim to find so annoying about Jar.
You New Age sentimentalists you.
.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : No reason given.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 6:59 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 8:56 AM Archer Opteryx has replied
 Message 185 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 9:09 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5933 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 182 of 301 (348688)
09-13-2006 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 172 by iano
09-13-2006 7:51 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
iano
The purpose of the law is not primarily that it be followed. It is a tool which is used by the Holy Spirit to convince a person that they are hopeless sinners.
Could you elaborate on the reasoning behind this? It strikes me that if you establish enough rules then it is impossible to avoid obeying all of them. How does this work to convince a thinking person of their being "worthless sinners" and not just being the humans we are?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 7:51 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 9:07 AM sidelined has replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1966 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 183 of 301 (348692)
09-13-2006 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 181 by Archer Opteryx
09-13-2006 8:33 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
You follow the Rosh Hoshana law while you are sleeping?
Jesus did us a favour by summing it all up for us in two commandments. Only two - but impossible to follow. Sure we couldn't even follow one of the two
Interesting. This is exactly the kind of inconsistency you, Faith, and Robin claim to find so annoying about Jar.
I am making the point that I cannot obey all the law all the time - I sin in other words. Somedays more than others - some days I set personal bests for level of sinfulness. What inconsistancy are you talking about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2006 8:33 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by Brian, posted 09-13-2006 1:16 PM iano has replied
 Message 260 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2006 8:34 PM iano has replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1966 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 184 of 301 (348694)
09-13-2006 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by sidelined
09-13-2006 8:37 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
Could you elaborate on the reasoning behind this? It strikes me that if you establish enough rules then it is impossible to avoid obeying all of them.
You have it. You had the law which said "Thou shall not commit adultery" So folk go around keeping their hands of their neighbours wives. Then Jesus comes and says that if you so much as lust after a woman you have committed adultery with her. Lets see you keep all those balls up in the air!
How people get a fluffy eyed view of Jesus I fail to understand...
How does this work to convince a thinking person of their being "worthless sinners" and not just being the humans we are?
Firstly it doesn't happen in a persons thinking - it happens in their heart. In their heart of hearts. The Holy Spirit uses the fact of a persons lawbreaking to convince them they are law breakers - they don't have to associate their law breaking with God at the outset or even close to salvation. They just need to be convinced they are bad. And the more laws you have the more you can be convicted of breaking. That was the genius of "love your neighbour". In reducing it down to such concentrated form, Jesus expanded it to cover every area of our lives - much more than adding millions of individual do's and don't to cover all bases. Love your neighbour covers a multitude of bases
The person who think's "I'm just human" is simply not so far along the path of being convinced as the person who is becoming convinced of their badness. This might be because God has not applied enough conviction to them or it could be that he has applied alot but the truths he is revealing have been rejected. Who knows which one it is?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by sidelined, posted 09-13-2006 8:37 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by sidelined, posted 09-13-2006 1:44 PM iano has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 185 of 301 (348696)
09-13-2006 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 181 by Archer Opteryx
09-13-2006 8:33 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
This is exactly the kind of inconsistency you, Faith, and Robin claim to find so annoying about Jar.
I'm talking about interpretation of scripture, not how somebody behaves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2006 8:33 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2006 9:56 AM robinrohan has replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3623 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 186 of 301 (348701)
09-13-2006 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 185 by robinrohan
09-13-2006 9:09 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
robinrohan:
I'm talking about interpretation of scripture, not how somebody behaves.
Behavior is interpretation. Life is performance art.
But why do you care? You're a nihilist, remember?
Do you know how laughable it is for a self-proclaimed nihilist to keep getting huffy about 'correct interpretation of scripture'?
Nihilism says no correct interpretation exists. How could it? There is no message. No meaning exists to discern. Every view has an equal claim because all points of view are meaningless anyway. All is absurd.
So why do you keep acting like a fundie? Real nihilists act like nihilists. Anyone who is really in on the cosmic joke will get the punch line.
Relax. Enjoy the chaos.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 9:09 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 10:07 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 187 of 301 (348703)
09-13-2006 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 186 by Archer Opteryx
09-13-2006 9:56 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
But why do you care? You're a nihilist, remember?
I wish people would stop telling me what I'm supposed to not care about or what I'm not supposed to be interested in. I have various interests. A nihilist doesn't sit around all day thinking of ultimates, any more than anyone else.
Do you know how laughable it is for a self-proclaimed nihilist to keep getting huffy about 'correct interpretation of scripture'?
By "correct," I mean merely what the authors of the Bible had in mind. I've explained above why the PC version irritates me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2006 9:56 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by ringo, posted 09-13-2006 11:37 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 264 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2006 9:03 PM robinrohan has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4984 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 188 of 301 (348705)
09-13-2006 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 157 by Archer Opteryx
09-12-2006 9:48 PM


Re: Yeshua the Rabbi - not just Ham and Eggs
The thing about Lewis is that his apologetics are extremely childish, he doesn't really get into the real issues.
There is a certain type of Christian who think that Lewis is the apologist supreme, but this is because their minds are also very childish so Lewis' work appeals to them. the trilemma that you mention is only one of a few poorly thought out arguments by Lewis. I started ot read The Chronicles of Narnia, and the analogies are so excrutiatingly obvious that I couldn't stop rolling my eyes. I know it was written for children but it's a pretty pathetic collection of stories.
There are others in the same position, but not quite as eloquent as Lewis. Josh McDowelkl for example is an utter ballon, his apologetics are for ten year olds. Strobel is the same, he allegedly set out to disprove Christ and ended up becoming a believer! Well, given the level of critical scholarship he presents in his books it is no surprise he became a Christian, it's easy money.
Brian.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-12-2006 9:48 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by Phat, posted 09-13-2006 10:41 AM Brian has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 189 of 301 (348710)
09-13-2006 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by Brian
09-13-2006 10:13 AM


Re: Yeshua the Rabbi - not just Ham and Eggs
Have you read any apologists who in any way challenged you? I think that there was one who was once a lawyer...I forget his name...was it Greenleaf or something?
As far as convincing someone, sometimes I think that the best apologists speak from the heart rather than from the mind.
Of course....given that I have no mind, its easy for me to say!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Brian, posted 09-13-2006 10:13 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 10:53 AM Phat has replied
 Message 198 by Brian, posted 09-13-2006 1:21 PM Phat has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 190 of 301 (348715)
09-13-2006 10:53 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by Phat
09-13-2006 10:41 AM


Re: Yeshua the Rabbi - not just Ham and Eggs
Have you read any apologists who in any way challenged you?
Newman's "Grammar of Assent" is perhaps more adult fare.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Phat, posted 09-13-2006 10:41 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by Phat, posted 09-13-2006 10:59 AM robinrohan has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 191 of 301 (348720)
09-13-2006 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by robinrohan
09-13-2006 10:53 AM


Re: Yeshua the Rabbi - not just Ham and Eggs
Interesting, Robin. I read this page from that author. The ideas are still digesting.
Edited by Phat, : oops I did it again

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 10:53 AM robinrohan has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 192 of 301 (348730)
09-13-2006 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 187 by robinrohan
09-13-2006 10:07 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
robinrohan writes:
By "correct," I mean merely what the authors of the Bible had in mind.
I've tried to explain to you before: if the Bible was "inspired", what the authors had in mind is irrelevant, because the interpretation(s) can be equally inpired. And if it was not inspired, what they had in mind is relevant only in a cultural/historic sense, not a religious/moral sense.
I wish people would stop telling me what I'm supposed to not care about or what I'm not supposed to be interested in.
If you're going to run around in a cape shouting, "I'm Nihilist-Man!", don't be surprized if people don't dote on your wishes.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 10:07 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 2:56 PM ringo has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1309 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 193 of 301 (348738)
09-13-2006 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by iano
09-13-2006 8:01 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
iano writes:
No eye has seen what God has prepared in advance for those who love him - so I'd reduce your conviction about Brians pub to speculation
from this it follows that you should reduce your views on the existance of god or the afterlife to speculation aswell. since "no eye has seen"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 8:01 AM iano has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4984 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 194 of 301 (348745)
09-13-2006 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by robinrohan
09-13-2006 8:12 AM


I wouldn't mind it so much if the New Agers, instead of introducing fraudulent interpretations of scripture.
But the thing with calling an intepretation fraudulent suggests that you have proof that they are fraudulent, which you don't.
Do you honestly think if the church fathers took the bible as literally as Faith or Ian does that there would be such a thing as Christianty?
There wouldn't be. The Bible has to be interpreted becaus eit is ludicrous to take it at face value. All you can do is go with the interpretation that you feel is the correct one and hope for the best.
I think the sooner everyone realises that the Bible, the Qur'an, or any other religious hocus pocus collection of texts are just little stories, then the safer the world will be for us sane people.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 8:12 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by robinrohan, posted 09-13-2006 3:03 PM Brian has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4984 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 195 of 301 (348747)
09-13-2006 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by iano
09-13-2006 7:51 AM


Re: Morals in the Gospels
The purpose of the law is not primarily that it be followed.
Make up your mind Ian!
Didn't you say
You are instructed, by someone who says he is God, to do these things and he has made it crystal clear what will happen to anyone who does not do what these commandments demand of them. To hell they shall go.
I'll keep you a nice warm seat.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 7:51 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by iano, posted 09-13-2006 2:21 PM Brian has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024