Sort of working back to front...
Its too bad, for you, that this evidence cannot be substantiated, but then, that would make it all too easy and rid life of "the most potent element of human existance" ... faith.
That faith is the most potent element of human existence is your unporvable opinion.
(in reference to the divinity of Christ)keep in mind that you have no evidence but there could be evidence for other.
Then it isn't evidence. Evidence works for everyone if it really is evidence. There is no such thing as evidence for you but not for me. In any case, I am not here to debate for the umpteenth time whether there is evidence for the divinity of Christ. There isn't, which is why I don't believe in it.
The question is why, given this lack of evidence, does anyone choose to believe in such divinity. So far, Phat and CS have basically said "Because I do". That's nice. Why? We have this from CS:
I believe that Jesus spoke so much truth (about the way you should live your life, etc.) that I can believe everything that he said, including being the son of god.
Are we really to beieve that it is outside the realm of possibility for Christ to have lied or been deluded about one thing only... his divinity? That is, of course, assuming that his teachings are actually applicable in modern times or that they ever were. Believe it if you will, CS. That is your right, but it isn't a very compelling reason.
And finally...
I don't think Jesus was a con man because he didn't gain anything from the con, and he allowed himself to be crucified seemingly defeating the purpose of a con.
Maybe he was just really good at the street preaching end of things but bad at the payoff and getaway parts.